Maps Opportunity Radar
Find evidence-backed Maps + AI opportunities without pretending novelty or virality can be guaranteed.
Required References
Read:
references/EVIDENCE-POLICY.mdreferences/GITHUB-GROWTH-PLAYBOOK.mdreferences/MAPS-AI-OPPORTUNITY-PLAYBOOK.md
Research Scope
Inspect fresh signals across:
- Google Maps Platform
- Places API
- Places Aggregate API
- Google Business Profile APIs
- Google Maps Agent Skills
- Google Maps MCP projects
- ChatGPT + Maps
- Claude + Maps
- Codex + Maps
- Gemini + Maps
- local SEO
- local-rank tracking
- geospatial agents
- creator-location tools
- Timeline / Takeout tooling
- MapLibre / open geospatial tooling
Core Questions
- What official capability already exists?
- What strong open-source project already solves the basic job?
- Which user still has an unsolved workflow?
- Can the result be measured or demonstrated?
- Can it be built without scraping or prohibited data storage?
- Is it useful to creators, agencies, local businesses or developers?
- Does it fit this repository, or should it be a separate product?
Novelty Rule
Never say:
Nobody has ever built this.
unless comprehensive evidence actually supports that statement.
Prefer:
Direct competition appears limited for this specific job based on the current search sample.
Viral / Revenue Rule
Never promise:
- virality
- one million users
- sponsorship
- revenue
- GitHub Trending placement
Instead identify the mechanics that could improve distribution:
- sharp problem
- fast first result
- shareable output
- proof
- portability
- low setup friction
- trust
- timing
Competitor Teardown
For each strong competitor capture:
- repository
- stars
- forks
- update recency
- one-line promise
- install friction
- tools / workflows
- proof
- licensing
- missing workflow
Candidate Score
Use a transparent heuristic:
- 25% demand evidence
- 20% direct-supply gap
- 20% strategic fit
- 15% proof potential
- 15% compliance feasibility
- 5% distribution ease
Apply a strong penalty to a generic Google Maps MCP wrapper if an existing official or mature implementation already covers the same job.
Policy Gate
Before recommending a build, run the concept through maps-policy-guard.
Reject or redesign concepts that depend on:
- consumer Maps UI scraping
- prohibited bulk export / permanent storage
- hidden Street View harvesting
- auto-spam outreach
- sensitive-trait inference
- fabricated review activity
Output
Maps Opportunity Radar
Evidence Window
- Date:
- Sources:
- Confidence:
Official Capability Baseline
| Capability | Official option | Implication |
|---|
Open-Source Competitor Snapshot
| Repository | Signal | Strength | Gap |
|---|
Demand / Supply Proxies
| Theme | Demand signal | Direct supply | Interpretation |
|---|
Opportunity Candidates
| Candidate | User | Job | Evidence | Compliance | Score |
|---|
Best Prototype
- Name:
- User:
- Problem:
- Why now:
- Input:
- Output:
- Proof contract:
- Install / run path:
- Policy status:
Separate-Product Candidates
List ideas that should not be forced into this repository.
Human Review Gate
- Current official docs checked
- Strong competitors checked
- No fake novelty claim
- No guaranteed virality claim
- Policy architecture reviewed
- Human approval required before publishing a new skill or product
Core Principle
Find the missing workflow above the map API, not another wrapper around the same endpoints.