/good-skill
A planted fixture that satisfies every blocking skill-eval rule so the gate passes cleanly.
DevOps discipline for AI coding agents: shape the work, track it as a graph, and get each change judged by a context that didn't write it.
Indexed skills
30
Skill groups
3
GitHub stars
446
Forks
42
Implement changes, repairs or waves; return per-lane evidence. Use when: coding, service operations, reliability, delivery, incident recovery, resilience or toil is authorized.
Operate Gas City through its Mayor, registry packs and native run state. Use when: the caller explicitly selects Gas City; factory completion does not replace independent judgment.
Freshly judge a finished change and its claims against original acceptance. Use when: acceptance verdict or independent proof is sought. Clarify generic checks or readiness first.
Dispatch independent tasks to parallel workers or selected persistent roles. Use when: delegation is authorized with disjoint scopes; execution does not validate output.
Write grounded docs, READMEs, repo instructions or continuity handoffs. Use when: these documents are requested; no reports as a routine completion ritual.
Compare model perspectives for brainstorming, planning, validation, idea duels or interviews. Use when: independent proposals or judgments need optional bounded debate.
Create, adapt, consolidate or repair skill packages and projections. Use when: authoring guidance, descriptions or structure; Skill Eval measures behavioral benefit.
Generate evidenced options or challenge an idea. Use when: deciding what to build or comparing alternatives; exploration does not authorize implementation.
Interview the caller one question at a time to settle a big outcome before agents work alone. Use when: shaping a goal or large RPI. Not for one question on one slice; use Plan.
Draft or lint a bounded persistent goal above a bead graph of RPI experiments. Use when: this goal workflow is explicitly selected; shaping a single change belongs to Plan.
Pick the next wave on a bead graph and keep the graph honest toward frozen acceptance. Use when: a goal starts a wave, or you ask what is next on an epic.
Coordinate authorized workers, prerequisites, isolated scopes and review capacity. Use when: dispatching, recovering or routing feedback. Not for implementation or judgment.
Define intended behavior, review write scope and assess reversible decisions. Use when: discovery needs clarification or resumption before one complete slice; stop once actionable.
Apply the outcome-to-judgment charter. Use when: the caller explicitly selects RPI; ordinary coding, delegation and native goals do not require this workflow.
Audit claimed state, goals or native status. Use when: a claim audit or snapshot is requested. Clarify advice versus acceptance for ambiguous checking or readiness requests.
Give advisory feedback on a plan, design or code. Use when: suggestions, tradeoffs or a second look are wanted. Not for acceptance or write scope; use Validate or Plan.
Clarify domain terms, bounded contexts and repository conventions. Use when: naming, rule ownership or Go and other language standards are unclear; avoid a broad survey.
Challenge a rollout plan with one fresh judge before implementation; identify what could make it fail. Not for finished-code judgment. Triggers: "one judge", "challenge this plan".
Trace code or test a recurring pattern to answer one cited question. Use when: uncertainty needs evidence. Not for external feature teardowns; use reverse-engineer.
Find reviewed context, capture evidence or curate maintained claims. Use when: prior evidence can change an action, or learning is requested; no mandatory recall or lesson.
Analyze outcomes or an interim cutoff. Use when: a postmortem is explicitly requested; consumes available judgment, never gates code acceptance or requires a lesson.
Measure whether a skill helps a named task or needs revision or removal. Use when: a bounded routing or coding evaluation is requested; conformance alone cannot show benefit.
Run a supplied task in AGY Antigravity and collect its result. Use when: the caller selects AGY; never a fallback for native coding.
Run one prompt through headless Codex and capture its result. Use when: requesting a single noninteractive Codex process. Not for worker batches or retries.
Simplify structure, interfaces or responsibilities while preserving behavior. Use when: a focused refactor is requested; feature changes need their own intent.
Tear down an authorized competitor repo, binary or product into a feature inventory and adoption choices. Use when: comparing an external system; local questions go to Research.
Review code or scan for security vulnerabilities, secrets, dependencies and prompt risks. Use when: concrete exposure needs assessment; never silently change policy.
Write behavioral tests, practice TDD or inspect important coverage gaps. Use when: test design or missing proof needs work; running an existing suite needs no skill.
The badge links readers to this page. It shows the skilld mark and no counts, and it follows the reader's light or dark GitHub theme.
<a href="https://skilld.dev/gh/boshu2/agentops">
<picture>
<source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://skilld.dev/b/boshu2/agentops?theme=dark">
<source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://skilld.dev/b/boshu2/agentops?theme=light">
<img alt="Skill repository on skilld.dev" src="https://skilld.dev/b/boshu2/agentops?theme=light">
</picture>
</a>