Poe

You must use this when producing any research prose — literature reviews, syntheses, analyses, methodology descriptions, discussion sections, abstracts, or any written output intended for an academic audience.

You must use this when analyzing claims, evaluating evidence, or Identifying logical fallacies in research.

You must use this when identifying ethical risks, ensuring participant privacy, or preparing IRB applications.

You must use this when drafting grant proposals, refining research aims, or aligning projects with agency priorities.

You must use this when formulating testable hypotheses, designing experimental controls, or defining falsification criteria.

You must use this when synthesizing existing knowledge, identifying research gaps, or tracing the evolution of scientific ideas.

You must use this when investigating complex claims across diverse sources or fact-checking contradictory information.

You must use this when critiquing academic manuscripts, evaluating methodological rigor, or providing structured reviewer feedback.

You must use this when designing qualitative studies, developing coding schemes, or performing thematic analysis.

You must use this when selecting statistical tests, interpreting effect sizes, or conducting power analysis.

Use this when starting a new research project or managing a complex, multi-step research workflow.

You must use this when matching research questions to appropriate designs, sampling strategies, or validity controls — or when a research problem is stuck and needs creative reframing (cross-domain analogies, first-principles deconstruction).

You must use this when merging findings from multiple studies into a coherent narrative with grounded evidence.

You must use this when conducting PRISMA-standard systematic reviews, protocol development, or Risk of Bias assessment.

Use when understanding your capabilities, how to use skills, or the rules of the Co-Researcher system.