All skills

Use when making text sound human, removing AI tells, or fixing writing that sounds like ChatGPT. Detects and rewrites AI patterns: overused phrases (testament to, pivotal, landscape, delve), structural tells (rule of three, em dash overuse, negative parallelisms, copula avoidance), promotional language, and vague attributions. Keywords: AI-generated, humanize, writing style, natural writing, human voice, remove AI patterns, conversational tone. Triggers on "humanize writing" or "remove AI tells".

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/acedergren/agentic-tools/humanizer

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

SKILL.md

≈128 tokens always: the name and description. ≈1.4k when used: this file. ≈888 more on demand in 1 file.

Humanizer: AI Pattern Detection & Voice Injection

When to Use

Load this skill when the user request matches the frontmatter description for Humanizer: AI Pattern Detection & Voice Injection.

Transform AI-generated text into human writing by detecting patterns and injecting authentic voice.

NEVER

  • Never remove AI phrases without also injecting personality — sterile text is still obviously AI.
  • Never over-correct (random punctuation chaos !== human voice).
  • Never remove ALL structure from formal or academic contexts — know what the audience expects.
  • Never batch-replace AI words without checking domain context ("landscape" in CV papers may be correct terminology).
  • Never fix every pattern at once — identify the 3-5 dominant patterns and address those.

Before You Edit: Diagnostic Framework

Answer these before applying any changes:

Voice assessment:

  • What personality should come through? (witty, skeptical, conversational, authoritative)
  • Does the text have opinions, or just facts? Human writing has stakes.

Pattern prioritization:

  • Which 3-5 patterns dominate? (Don't fix everything at once)
  • Should some AI-isms stay? (Formal technical docs may keep certain structures)

Rewrite philosophy:

  • Am I removing patterns OR injecting personality? (Must do both)
  • Does my rewrite sound like a specific human wrote it? (Not just "less AI")

Statistical density check (run before editing):

  • AI vocabulary words per 100 words: >3 = heavy AI signature
  • Em dashes per paragraph: >2 = structural tell
  • "However" paragraph starts: >20% = AI transition overuse
  • All paragraphs same length? = AI rhythm uniformity
  • Every list has exactly 3 items? = rule of three addiction

Humanization Level by Context

Context Level Remove Inject Voice
Academic/Research 10-20% Delete slop only (delve, testament to) Minimal — keep structure
Technical Docs 30-50% Remove promotional language, keep clarity Light specificity: "handles edge case X"
Blog/Marketing 70-90% Remove most AI tells Strong personality, distinct author presence
Social/Casual 100% Delete all AI patterns Pure conversational, break all rules
Formal Business 40-60% Remove obvious slop, keep professionalism Controlled confidence

Most Common AI Patterns

Content-Level

Undue emphasis on significance:

  • Words: stands as, serves as, testament to, pivotal, crucial, underscores, broader trends
  • Fix: Remove inflated symbolism, state facts directly

Promotional language:

  • Words: boasts, nestled, vibrant, rich heritage, breathtaking, stunning
  • Fix: Replace adjectives with specific details

Vague attributions:

  • Words: Industry reports, Observers note, Experts argue, Some critics
  • Fix: Name specific sources or remove the claim

Language-Level

AI vocabulary words (post-2023 frequency spike):

  • delve, crucial, enhance, foster, garner, intricate, landscape (abstract), pivotal, showcase, tapestry (abstract), underscore
  • Fix: Use plain synonyms or restructure

Copula avoidance (avoiding "is/are"):

  • Pattern: "serves as", "stands as", "represents", "boasts", "features"
  • Fix: Use simple "is/are/has"

Negative parallelisms:

  • Pattern: "Not only... but...", "It's not just about X, it's Y"
  • Fix: State directly without forced contrast

Style-Level

Em dash overuse:

  • Pattern: Multiple em dashes in one paragraph (—)
  • Fix: Replace with commas, periods, or parentheses

Rule of three overuse:

  • Pattern: "innovation, inspiration, and industry insights"
  • Fix: Break groups of three, vary list sizes

Non-obvious AI tells (beyond the common list):

  • Paragraph-starting "However" — appears 3x more in GPT text than human writing
  • Passive voice in conclusions — "It can be concluded that..." (AI hedging pattern)
  • Symmetric sentence structure — every paragraph follows same length/rhythm
  • "Importantly" mid-sentence — statistical quirk of AI output
  • Abstract "landscape" metaphors — "the technology landscape", "the business landscape"

When to Load Full Pattern References

Load references/content-patterns.md when:

  • Text contains 5+ promotional adjectives (stunning, breathtaking, vibrant, rich)
  • Significance inflation detected ("serves as testament", "stands as pivotal")
  • Do NOT load for casual blog posts or social media text

Load references/language-patterns.md when:

  • Text uses 8+ AI vocabulary words (delve, showcase, intricate, foster, garner)
  • Heavy copula avoidance patterns ("serves as" instead of "is")
  • Do NOT load for technical documentation where precision matters

Load references/style-patterns.md when:

  • Text has 6+ em dashes in single paragraph
  • Rule of three appears 4+ times
  • Do NOT load for academic papers (formatting may be required)

Quick Example

Before:

The new software update serves as a testament to the company's commitment to innovation. Moreover, it provides a seamless, intuitive, and powerful user experience—ensuring that users can accomplish their goals efficiently. It's not just an update, it's a revolution in how we think about productivity.

After:

The software update adds batch processing, keyboard shortcuts, and offline mode. Early beta feedback has been positive—most testers report finishing tasks faster.

Removed: "serves as a testament", "Moreover", "seamless, intuitive, and powerful", "It's not just...it's...". Added: specific features, concrete evidence.

Arguments

  • $ARGUMENTS: Text, file path, or rewrite goal to humanize
    • Example: /humanizer "make this sound less like ChatGPT"
    • Example: /humanizer docs/launch-email.md
    • If empty: ask for the text to rewrite

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

No alerts6mo4 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub6mo

    The humanizer skill assists in identifying and revising AI-generated text patterns to create more natural writing. It functions by analyzing input content and applying stylistic transformations using tools with file-modification privileges. The primary security consideration is its susceptibility to indirect prompt injection, as it processes untrusted user input without explicit boundary markers or sanitization while maintaining access to sensitive capabilities like file writing and editing.

  • Socket6mo

    No alerts

  • Snyk6mo

    Risk: LOW · No issues

  • Runlayer6mo

    2 files scanned · No issues

Signed by skilld at 9d099e9. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 2 months ago.

Steadyupdated 4 months ago

README badge

README badge for acedergren/agentic-tools/humanizer