All skills
addyosmani avatar

/web-quality-audit

@c6b06ad official

Run an evidence-led web quality audit covering performance, accessibility, SEO, best practices, and agentic browsing. Use when asked to "audit my site", "review web quality", "run lighthouse audit", "check page quality", or "optimize my website".

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/addyosmani/web-quality-skills/web-quality-audit

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

SKILL.md

≈66 tokens always: the name and description. ≈2.5k when used: this file.

Web quality audit

Comprehensive quality review that combines live browser evidence with source inspection. Covers Performance, Accessibility, SEO, Best Practices, and Agentic Browsing without treating an aggregate score as proof of quality.

Lighthouse 13+. The Performance category now uses shared Performance Insights across Lighthouse and the DevTools Performance panel (announcement). Follow current insight names and evidence. Do not require removed audit IDs or automatically recreate their recommendations; some were retired because they were noisy, inactionable, or easy to over-recommend.

How it works

  1. Establish the audit target: representative URLs, important states and journeys, public versus authenticated access, and mobile/desktop scope.
  2. If a page can run, read the measurement workflow and collect a minimal live baseline before searching the codebase broadly.
  3. Use runtime failures to localize source inspection. Keep measured findings separate from hypotheses found only in code.
  4. Categorize by user impact and confidence, then make or recommend specific fixes.
  5. Re-run equivalent automated checks and the affected manual flows. Report what is verified and what still needs field or human validation.

Tool routing

Use the best capability already available; do not block the audit on optional setup.

Need Preferred route Fallback
Performance and Core Web Vitals Record a browser performance trace and analyze focused insights; with Chrome DevTools MCP, use performance_start_trace then performance_analyze_insight Lighthouse CLI or PageSpeed Insights lab data
Real-user performance CrUX values included in current DevTools trace summaries PageSpeed Insights/CrUX Vis; direct CrUX API only when a key is already available or automation is requested
Accessibility, SEO, Best Practices, Agentic Browsing Run a live Lighthouse audit; with Chrome DevTools MCP, use lighthouse_audit Category-specific Lighthouse CLI audits plus manual checks
Rendered semantics and interaction Inspect the accessibility tree and exercise the UI; with Chrome DevTools MCP, use take_snapshot and focused evaluate_script Browser/manual testing
Source smoke test scripts/analyze.sh <path> Direct source inspection

Chrome DevTools MCP's lighthouse_audit intentionally excludes performance. Its navigation mode reloads the page; use snapshot mode when preserving the current authenticated or user-created state matters. The static analyzer is a fast smoke test, not a substitute for a rendered-page audit.

Audit categories

Performance

Core Web Vitals — Must pass for good page experience:

  • LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) < 2.5s. The largest visible element must render quickly. Optimize images, fonts, and server response time.
  • INP (Interaction to Next Paint) < 200ms. User interactions must feel instant. Reduce JavaScript execution time and break up long tasks.
  • CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) < 0.1. Content must not jump around. Set explicit dimensions on images, embeds, and ads.

Resource Optimization:

  • Compress images. Use WebP/AVIF with fallbacks. Serve correctly sized images via srcset.
  • Minimize JavaScript. Remove unused code. Use code splitting. Defer non-critical scripts.
  • Optimize CSS. Extract critical CSS. Remove unused styles. Avoid @import.
  • Efficient fonts. Use font-display: swap. Preload critical fonts. Subset to needed characters.

Loading Strategy:

  • Preconnect to origins. Add <link rel="preconnect"> for third-party domains.
  • Preload critical assets. LCP images, fonts, and above-fold CSS.
  • Lazy load below-fold content. Images, iframes, and heavy components.
  • Cache effectively. Long cache TTLs for static assets. Immutable caching for hashed files.

Accessibility

Perceivable:

  • Text alternatives. Every <img> has meaningful alt text. Decorative images use alt="".
  • Color contrast. Minimum 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text (WCAG AA).
  • Don't rely on color alone. Use icons, patterns, or text alongside color indicators.
  • Captions and transcripts. Video has captions. Audio has transcripts.

Operable:

  • Keyboard accessible. All functionality available via keyboard. No keyboard traps.
  • Focus visible. Clear focus indicators on all interactive elements.
  • Skip links. Provide "Skip to main content" for keyboard users.
  • Sufficient time. Users can extend time limits. No auto-advancing content without controls.

Understandable:

  • Page language. Set lang attribute on <html>.
  • Consistent navigation. Same navigation structure across pages.
  • Error identification. Form errors clearly described and associated with fields.
  • Labels and instructions. All form inputs have associated labels.

Robust:

  • Valid HTML. No duplicate IDs. Properly nested elements.
  • ARIA used correctly. Prefer native elements. ARIA roles match behavior.
  • Name, role, value. Interactive elements have accessible names and correct roles.

SEO

Crawlability:

  • Valid robots.txt. Doesn't block important resources.
  • XML sitemap. Lists all important pages. Submitted to Search Console.
  • Canonical URLs. Prevent duplicate content issues.
  • No noindex on important pages. Check meta robots and headers.

On-Page SEO:

  • Unique title tags. Make each title descriptive and concise; display truncation varies by device and result type.
  • Meta descriptions. Write useful, page-specific summaries; search engines may choose a different snippet.
  • Heading hierarchy. The primary heading is descriptive and the structure is logical; do not fail valid HTML solely for using more than one <h1>.
  • Descriptive link text. Not "click here" or "read more".

Technical SEO:

  • Mobile-friendly. Responsive design. Tap targets ≥ 48px.
  • HTTPS. Secure connection required.
  • Page experience signals. Use field Core Web Vitals as evidence, without promising a ranking change.
  • Structured data. JSON-LD for rich snippets (Article, Product, FAQ, etc.).

Best practices

Security:

  • HTTPS everywhere. No mixed content. HSTS enabled.
  • No vulnerable libraries. Keep dependencies updated.
  • CSP headers. Content Security Policy to prevent XSS.
  • No exposed source maps. In production builds.

Modern Standards:

  • No deprecated APIs. Replace document.write, synchronous XHR, etc.
  • Valid doctype. Use <!DOCTYPE html>.
  • Charset declared. <meta charset="UTF-8"> as first element in <head>.
  • No browser errors. Clean console. No CORS issues.

UX Patterns:

  • No intrusive interstitials. Especially on mobile.
  • Clear permission requests. Only ask when needed, with context.
  • No misleading buttons. Buttons do what they say.

Agentic browsing

Use the Lighthouse Agentic Browsing results as technical signals for how well assistants can understand and interact with the rendered page.

  • Accessible interaction surface. Semantic HTML, labels, names, roles, and states must expose meaningful controls in the accessibility tree.
  • WebMCP integrations are valid when present. Review registered tools, schemas, and form coverage; do not add WebMCP solely to raise an audit score.
  • llms.txt is optional. A valid file may help compatible tools discover curated content, but a Lighthouse pass does not prove that search or AI products will ingest, rank, or cite it.
  • Keep this category separate from SEO claims. Agentic browsability is not evidence of search ranking or AI visibility.

Severity levels

Level Description Action
Critical Security vulnerabilities, complete failures Fix immediately
High Core Web Vitals failures, major a11y barriers Fix before launch
Medium Performance opportunities, SEO improvements Fix within sprint
Low Minor optimizations, code quality Fix when convenient

Audit output format

When performing an audit, structure findings as:

## Audit results

### Evidence
| Signal | Scope/conditions | Result | Source |
|--------|------------------|--------|--------|
| LCP | URL, phone, p75/28 days | 3.1s (needs improvement) | CrUX |
| Accessibility | URL, mobile navigation | 92 | Lighthouse |

### Critical issues (X found)
- **[Category]** Issue description. File: `path/to/file.js:123`
  - **Impact:** Why this matters
  - **Evidence:** Measured failure, runtime observation, or source hypothesis
  - **Fix:** Specific code change or recommendation

### High priority (X found)
...

### Summary
- Performance: measured status and X findings
- Accessibility: automated status, X findings, manual checks pending/passed
- SEO: X findings
- Best Practices: X findings
- Agentic Browsing: X findings or not available

### Recommended priority
1. First fix this because...
2. Then address...
3. Finally optimize...

### Verification
- Re-run results under the same conditions
- Manual checks completed
- Field validation still pending

Quick checklist

Before every deploy

  • Core Web Vitals passing
  • No accessibility errors (axe/Lighthouse)
  • No console errors
  • HTTPS working
  • Meta tags present

Weekly review

  • Check Search Console for issues
  • Review Core Web Vitals trends
  • Update dependencies
  • Test with screen reader

Monthly deep dive

  • Full Lighthouse audit
  • Performance profiling
  • Accessibility audit with real users
  • SEO keyword review

References

For detailed guidelines on specific areas:

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

No alerts16d5 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub16d

    The skill is a safe utility for performing web quality audits on local HTML content. It provides documentation for manual audits alongside a bash script that performs local static analysis of HTML files to check for standard tags and attributes. The script operates entirely offline, performs no file modifications, and properly quotes variables to prevent command injection.

  • Socket16d

    No alerts

  • Snyk16d

    Risk: LOW · No issues

  • Runlayer7mo

    2 files scanned · No issues

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at c6b06ad. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub last month.

Steadyupdated last month
metadata
{
  "author": "web-quality-skills",
  "version": "2.0"
}
  • Performance
  • SEO
  • lighthouse
  • accessibility
  • core-web-vitals
  • auditing
  • best-practices
  • web-quality

README badge

README badge for addyosmani/web-quality-skills/web-quality-audit

Runs comprehensive quality audits covering performance (Core Web Vitals, resource optimization, loading strategy), accessibility (WCAG compliance, keyboard navigation, ARIA), SEO (crawlability, on-page signals, structured data), and best practices (security, modern standards, UX patterns). Organizes 150+ checks across four categories with severity levels and actionable fixes.

Generated from the current SKILL.md.

Does this skill run actual Lighthouse audits or analyze code statically?
The skill analyzes provided code and projects for quality issues, categorizing findings by the four Lighthouse audit categories (Performance, Accessibility, SEO, Best Practices). It does not execute the Lighthouse CLI tool itself.
Does this cover Lighthouse v13's Performance Insight Audits?
Yes. The skill notes that Lighthouse v13 migrated Performance audits to Performance Insight Audits, consolidating checks like CLS-related audits into `cls-culprits-insight` and image audits into `image-delivery-insight`. The underlying advice remains the same.
What are the Core Web Vitals thresholds this skill uses?
LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) must be under 2.5s, INP (Interaction to Next Paint) under 200ms, and CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) under 0.1.
Does this skill provide code examples for fixes?
Yes. The skill includes specific, actionable recommendations and code examples for fixes across all audit categories.
What if I'm auditing a static site with no JavaScript?
The skill covers all four Lighthouse categories (Performance, Accessibility, SEO, Best Practices) and can audit any web project, including static sites. JavaScript-specific optimizations simply would not apply.

Generated from the current SKILL.md. These answers refresh after source changes.