All skills
bitwarden avatar

/work-breakdown

@faf72be official
by bitwardenbitwarden/ai-plugins155 stars
20

Break down features and requirements into actionable, implementable tasks with clear scope and acceptance criteria. Use when planning implementation, organizing complex work, or creating task lists. Trigger phrases: "break down tasks", "create work plan", "organize implementation", "plan development". This skill works best when preceded by `requirements-elicitation` skill use.

  • 2 files
  • 14.9 KB
  • Updated 7 months ago
  • GitHub

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/bitwarden/ai-plugins/work-breakdown

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

SKILL.md

β‰ˆ99 tokens always: the name and description. β‰ˆ1.4k when used: this file. β‰ˆ2.3k more on demand in 1 file.

Work Breakdown

Key Capabilities

  1. Task Identification β€” Identify discrete, implementable work units from high-level requirements
  2. Dependency Analysis β€” Determine task order, relationships, and blocking dependencies
  3. Scope Definition β€” Create clear, bounded task descriptions with acceptance criteria
  4. Phase Organization β€” Group related tasks into logical implementation phases

Approach

1. Read and Understand Requirements

  • Review the complete requirements document
  • Understand the full scope and all success criteria
  • Identify major components and subsystems affected
  • Note security requirements and constraints

2. Identify System Components

  • What parts of the codebase are affected?
  • Which APIs, services, databases, UIs need changes?
  • What external systems or dependencies are involved?
  • Are multiple platforms affected (web, desktop, mobile, CLI)?

3. Break into Phases

Organize work into logical phases:

Phase 1: Architecture & Design

  • Design system architecture and data models
  • Create sequence diagrams, data flow diagrams
  • Define API contracts and interfaces
  • Security threat modeling (if applicable)

Phase 2: Implementation

  • Core functionality development
  • Database schema changes
  • API endpoint creation
  • UI component development
  • Integration work

Phase 3: Testing

  • Unit test development
  • Integration test development
  • End-to-end test scenarios
  • Security testing (if applicable)
  • Cross-platform verification

Phase 4: Documentation & Deployment

  • User documentation
  • API documentation
  • Deployment procedures
  • Migration scripts (if needed)

4. Define Individual Tasks

Each task should be:

  • Right-sized: Completable in 2-8 hours (not days)
  • Independent: Can be worked on without blocking on other incomplete tasks (except explicit dependencies)
  • Testable: Has clear acceptance criteria that can be verified
  • Specific: Clear description of what needs to be done
  • Assigned: Identified role or team (e.g., "Backend team", "Security team", "QA")

5. Identify Dependencies

  • What tasks must be completed before others can start?
  • Are there parallel work streams that can proceed independently?
  • What external dependencies exist (library updates, third-party APIs)?
  • What approval gates are needed (security review, design review)?

6. Validate Completeness

  • Do the tasks cover all functional requirements?
  • Are non-functional requirements addressed (performance, security, reliability)?
  • Is testing adequately planned?
  • Is documentation included?
  • Are verification commands/tests defined?

Task Template

Each task should follow this structure:

**Task X.Y**: [Concise task title]

- **Description**: [What needs to be done]
- **Team/Role**: [Backend | Frontend | Security | QA | DevOps]
- **Estimated Duration**: [2-8 hours]
- **Dependencies**: [Task IDs that must complete first, or "None"]
- **Deliverables**: [Specific outputs or changes]
- **Acceptance Criteria**: [How to verify completion]

Example

See examples/oauth-authentication.md for a complete worked example.

Best Practices

Do's

  • βœ… Right-size tasks β€” 2-8 hours each, not full days or weeks
  • βœ… Clear acceptance criteria β€” Must be testable and specific
  • βœ… Assign appropriate teams β€” Match task to expertise
  • βœ… Group related tasks β€” Organize into phases for clarity
  • βœ… Identify dependencies β€” Make blocking relationships explicit
  • βœ… Ensure completeness β€” All requirements covered, nothing orphaned
  • βœ… Include verification β€” Testing and validation tasks for every feature
  • βœ… Plan documentation β€” Technical and user docs are deliverables
  • βœ… Consider security β€” Threat modeling and security testing included
  • βœ… Think cross-platform β€” Bitwarden runs everywhere; plan for it

Don'ts

  • ❌ Tasks too large β€” >1 day tasks should be broken down further
  • ❌ Vague acceptance criteria β€” "Make it work" is not testable
  • ❌ Circular dependencies β€” Tasks shouldn't block each other in loops
  • ❌ Missing phases β€” Don't skip design, testing, or documentation
  • ❌ Unclear deliverables β€” Every task should produce something concrete
  • ❌ Ignoring platforms β€” Don't forget mobile, CLI, browser extensions
  • ❌ Skipping security β€” Security tasks are not optional at Bitwarden

Output Format

Organize work breakdown in structured phases:

# Work Breakdown: [Feature Name]

## Summary

- **Total Estimated Duration**: X-Y hours
- **Number of Tasks**: N tasks across M phases
- **Teams Involved**: [List of teams]
- **Critical Path**: [Key dependencies or bottlenecks]

---

## Phase 1: [Phase Name]

**Goal**: [What this phase accomplishes]

**Task 1.1**: [Task title]

- **Description**: [What needs to be done]
- **Team/Role**: [Who does this]
- **Estimated Duration**: [Hours]
- **Dependencies**: [Prerequisites or "None"]
- **Deliverables**: [Concrete outputs]
- **Acceptance Criteria**: [How to verify]

**Task 1.2**: [Next task]
...

---

## Phase 2: [Phase Name]

...

---

## Verification

After all phases complete, verify:

- [ ] All functional requirements implemented
- [ ] All non-functional requirements met
- [ ] All security requirements addressed
- [ ] All tests passing (unit, integration, E2E)
- [ ] Documentation complete and accurate
- [ ] Deployment procedures tested

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

No third-party reports yet.

Signed by skilld at faf72be. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 20 hours ago.

Activeupdated 7 months ago
  • work-breakdown
  • project-planning
  • task-management
  • requirements
  • agile
  • scope-definition
  • dependencies
  • acceptance-criteria

README badge

README badge for bitwarden/ai-plugins/work-breakdown

Breaks down features and requirements into right-sized, implementable tasks organized by phase, with clear dependencies and acceptance criteria. Designed for planning complex work in Bitwarden's multi-platform environment (web, mobile, CLI, browser extensions) and works best after requirements elicitation.

Generated from the current SKILL.md.

What's the difference between this skill and general project planning?
This skill is tailored to breaking down software features and requirements into right-sized implementation tasks (2-8 hours each) with explicit dependencies, acceptance criteria, and team assignments. It assumes you're planning code work, not general project management.
Does this skill work standalone or does it need other skills?
It works best when preceded by the `requirements-elicitation` skill, which gathers and clarifies the requirements that this skill then breaks into tasks.
What if I don't know the team structure or roles ahead of time?
The skill uses role templates (Backend, Frontend, Security, QA, DevOps) as placeholders. You can adapt these to your actual team structure or leave them generic if roles aren't yet assigned.
How does this handle tasks that can't fit into 2-8 hours?
The skill instructs you to break oversized tasks down further rather than accept them as-is. Tasks larger than one full day should be subdivided into smaller, independently testable units.

Generated from the current SKILL.md. These answers refresh after source changes.