All skills
ferdinandobons avatar

/startup-positioning

@a5f97c3

Market positioning strategy using the April Dunford framework, enriched with JTBD discovery, Moore positioning statement, and Neumeier's Onliness Test. Produces a complete positioning document, positioning statement, competitive alternatives map, and market category analysis. Use when the user wants to define or refine their market positioning, find their unique position, differentiate from competitors, craft a positioning statement, choose a market category, or figure out "how should we position this product." Triggers for "positioning", "how to position", "market position", "differentiation strategy", "positioning statement", "competitive positioning", "category strategy", "where do we fit in the market", "how are we different", "unique value proposition", or any request to define, sharpen, or rethink positioning. Works standalone — no prior startup-design or startup-competitors session needed, but leverages their output if available.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/ferdinandobons/startup-skill/startup-positioning

Nothing lands on disk. Nothing to clean up.

Fork this Skill

Edit a local copy. It keeps the author and licence.

referencesframeworks.md

≈2k tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Positioning Frameworks Reference

Canonical definitions for the 5 positioning frameworks used in this skill. Apply them in order: Dunford's process first (primary engine), then express the result through Moore and Neumeier formats, grounded by JTBD thinking, and sanity-checked against Ries & Trout principles.


1. April Dunford — Obviously Awesome

Positioning defines how your product is the best in the world at providing something that a well-defined set of customers cares a lot about.

The 5 components (work through in this order):

  1. Competitive Alternatives — What would customers do if your solution didn't exist? Not just direct competitors — include manual processes, spreadsheets, hiring someone, doing nothing. This grounds the positioning in reality.

  2. Unique Attributes — What do you have that the alternatives don't? Be specific and factual. Not "better UX" but "drag-and-drop workflow builder that requires zero code." Capabilities, features, expertise, integrations, data, speed, etc.

  3. Value Themes — What do those attributes enable for the customer? Map each attribute to a customer benefit. Attributes are features; value themes are outcomes. "Drag-and-drop builder" → "Non-technical teams can build workflows without waiting for engineering." Group related attributes into 2-3 themes.

  4. Best-Fit Customers — Who cares the most about these value themes? The best customers are those for whom your unique value is critical, not just nice-to-have. Define by characteristics that make them care more than others.

  5. Market Category — The context you position your product in so the value is obvious. Three options:

    • Existing category: You're a better version of something people already buy (e.g., "CRM for real estate agents")
    • New sub-category: You take an existing category and add a qualifier (e.g., "AI-powered recruiting platform")
    • New category: Rare and expensive to do. Only if nothing else frames your value well.

Adapted 10-step process for AI-guided positioning:

  1. Understand your best customers — who loves your product and why
  2. Form the positioning team — in our case: the AI + the founder
  3. Align on vocabulary — define terms, abandon preconceptions about current positioning
  4. List your true competitive alternatives — EVERYTHING customers would do instead
  5. Isolate your unique attributes — what you have that alternatives don't
  6. Map attributes to value themes — attribute → "so what" → customer outcome
  7. Determine who cares most — best-fit customer characteristics
  8. Find your best market frame — category that makes value obvious
  9. Layer on a trend — only if genuine, optional
  10. Capture the positioning — multiple formats: Moore statement, Onliness, elevator pitch

Common pitfalls by component:

  • Alternatives: Only listing direct competitors. Miss the status quo — manual processes, spreadsheets, hiring someone, doing nothing. These are often the real competition.
  • Attributes: Listing features that alternatives also have. That is table stakes, not differentiation. If two competitors also have it, it is not unique.
  • Value Themes: Staying at the feature level instead of translating to outcomes. "AI-powered" is an attribute. "Get answers in seconds instead of hours" is a value theme.
  • Best-Fit Customers: Too broad ("SMBs") or demographic ("25-34 year olds") instead of characteristic-based. Define by behaviors, situations, and needs that make them care more.
  • Category: Inventing a category nobody searches for. If customers cannot Google it, they cannot find you.

2. Geoffrey Moore — Crossing the Chasm Positioning Statement

The template:

For [target customer] who [statement of need/opportunity], the [product name] is a [market category] that [statement of key benefit]. Unlike [primary competitive alternative], our product [statement of primary differentiation].

Field definitions:

  • Target customer = Dunford component 4: Best-Fit Customers
  • Need = The job to be done (from JTBD analysis)
  • Category = Dunford component 5: Market Category
  • Key benefit = Dunford component 3: Value Themes (pick the strongest)
  • Alternative = Dunford component 1: top Competitive Alternative
  • Differentiation = Dunford component 2: Unique Attributes (most defensible)

Example:

For mid-market engineering teams who need to track deployment reliability across microservices, DeployWatch is a deployment observability platform that surfaces breaking changes before they reach production. Unlike generic APM tools, DeployWatch correlates deployments with performance regressions in real-time.


3. Marty Neumeier — Zag (Onliness Statement)

Basic template:

Our [brand/product] is the only [category] that [point of radical differentiation].

Extended template (6 elements):

  • WHAT: The category you are in
  • HOW: Your point of differentiation
  • WHO: Your target audience
  • WHERE: Your market geography
  • WHY: The customer need you fulfill
  • WHEN: The trend or moment that makes this relevant

Example (Harley-Davidson):

"The only motorcycle manufacturer [WHAT] that makes big, loud motorcycles [HOW] for macho guys and macho wannabes [WHO] mostly in the United States [WHERE] who want to join a gang of cowboys [WHY] in an era of decreasing personal freedom [WHEN]."

How to use as validation:

  • If you cannot complete the basic statement convincingly, your positioning lacks a clear differentiator
  • If "only" feels like a stretch, you have not found genuinely unique ground yet
  • The extended version forces completeness — every element should feel natural, not forced
  • Try completing it from the customer's perspective: would THEY describe you this way?

4. JTBD — Jobs to Be Done

Core concept: Customers do not buy products — they "hire" products to get a job done. The job is stable even as products come and go.

Three types of jobs:

  • Functional: The practical task (e.g., "track my team's project status")
  • Social: How they want to be perceived (e.g., "look organized and in control to stakeholders")
  • Emotional: How they want to feel (e.g., "feel confident nothing is falling through the cracks")

Application to positioning:

  • JTBD broadens the competitive alternative set — ALL solutions hired for the same job compete, regardless of category
  • Understanding the emotional and social jobs reveals positioning angles that feature comparisons miss
  • The language customers use to describe their job IS the language your positioning should use
  • Underserved jobs (important but poorly satisfied) = strongest positioning opportunities

5. Ries & Trout — Positioning Principles

Core principles from "Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind":

  • Positioning lives in the customer's mind, not your product. It is about perception, not reality. You cannot force a position — you claim one that is available.
  • Simplicity wins. In an over-communicated world, only simple messages get through. One idea, clearly stated.
  • The mental ladder. Customers organize brands on mental ladders by attribute. You need to claim a rung. If the top rung is taken, find a different ladder.
  • First beats best. Being first in a category (in the customer's mind) is more powerful than being better. If you cannot be first in an existing category, create a subcategory where you ARE first.
  • Consistency over time. Positioning takes time to stick. Do not change it every quarter. Pick a position and hold it.

Application: These principles act as a final sanity check. After building positioning through Dunford's process, test it: Is it simple? Does it claim one clear rung? Is that rung available? Would it stick over time?

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

No rule matched.

skilld matched fixed text patterns in SKILL.md and file names. Patterns miss obfuscated code.

skilld run checks every file with the same patterns. It asks for approval before it loads a Skill with a behavior marked Needs approval.

1 warning23d5 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub23d

    The skill provides a market positioning strategy framework without any malicious code, external downloads from untrusted sources, data exfiltration risks, or obfuscation. It focuses on strategic market positioning and documentation analysis.

  • Socket23d

    No alerts

  • Snyk23d

    Risk: MEDIUM · 1 issue

  • Runlayer7mo

    1/7 files flagged

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at a5f97c3. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 2 hours ago.

Steadyupdated 4 months ago

README badge

README badge for ferdinandobons/startup-skill/startup-positioning