All skills
getsentry avatar

/pr-writer

@412f236 official
by Sentrygetsentry/skills1k stars
53

Create or refresh reviewer-facing PR titles and descriptions. Use when opening a PR, updating its title or body, or preparing branch changes for review.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/getsentry/skills/pr-writer

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

SKILL.md

≈41 tokens always: the name and description. ≈1.3k when used: this file. ≈4.1k more on demand in 4 files.

PR Writer

Write the PR body as a cover note for reviewers, not a changelog, template, validation log, or file-by-file summary.

Inspect the Change

Requires authenticated gh. Inspect the current branch, working tree, PR, base branch, commits, and full diff:

git branch --show-current
git status --porcelain
gh pr view --json number,title,body,url,baseRefName,headRefName
gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef

If gh pr view reports that no PR exists, continue with first-time PR creation. For an existing PR, use its baseRefName; otherwise use the repository default branch. Set BASE, then inspect:

git log "$BASE"..HEAD --oneline
git diff "$BASE"...HEAD

If on main or master, create a feature branch first. Ensure intended changes are committed and review the whole branch diff, not only the latest commit or existing PR text.

Core Rules

  • Describe concrete changed behavior, affected surfaces, and reviewer impact before implementation detail.
  • Explain motivation, risk, tradeoffs, migration, or review focus only when useful.
  • Use the smallest structure that makes the change easier to review.
  • Replace internal prompt or process terminology with specific behavior.
  • When refreshing a PR, rewrite around the current full diff without narrating review history.

Titles

Use <type>(<scope>): <subject> or <type>: <subject>.

Allowed types: feat, fix, ref, perf, docs, test, build, ci, chore, style, meta, license, and revert.

  • Describe the dominant full-branch change with the narrowest accurate type and scope.
  • Use ! only when the change breaks an external contract, and explain the affected surface in the body.
  • Avoid vague subjects such as update, cleanup, misc, fix stuff, or address feedback. Do not add a trailing period.
  • Keep an existing title only when it still describes the whole diff.

Body Shape

Choose the minimum useful shape:

Change Include
Small or obvious One concise paragraph without headings.
Feature, bug fix, or refactor Changed behavior and effect; add root cause, unchanged behavior, or non-obvious approach when relevant.
Contract or breaking change Affected API, schema, payload, config, permission, storage, or CLI surface; include compatibility and migration guidance.
Operational, visual, or workflow change User/operator effect, measured impact, failure modes, or flow when useful.
Broad, generated, or cross-cutting change Organizing principle, why the breadth is necessary, and where review should start.

Default:

<What changed and what effect it has.>

<Why the approach, risk, migration, or review focus matters, if not obvious.>

For review-feedback updates, describe the resulting PR as a whole rather than the sequence of revisions.

Reviewer Aids

Use an aid only when it reduces reviewer reconstruction work:

  • A compact before/after or interface example for changed contracts.
  • A small Mermaid diagram for async flows or state transitions.
  • A screenshot or recording note when visual evidence exists.
  • A rollout, compatibility, risk, or review-order note when reviewers or adopters need it.

Introduce an artifact with one sentence explaining what reviewers should notice. Omit it when prose is clearer.

Boundaries

  • Do not add default Summary, Changes, or Test Plan sections.
  • Omit routine validation unless it changes risk assessment or explains meaningful regression coverage. For docs, skills, copy, or config changes, omit it by default.
  • Do not paste commands, CI logs, validation dumps, commit logs, placeholders, or exhaustive file lists.
  • Never include customer or organization names, user emails, support ticket contents, secrets, or PII.
  • Use issue references only when verified from user input, branch names, commits, PR discussion, or tracker output. Fixes <issue> closes; Refs <issue> only links.

Create or Update

Create new PRs as drafts. Write the body to a temporary Markdown file, then run:

gh pr create --draft --title '<title>' --body-file /tmp/pr-body.md

Update existing PRs with gh api:

gh api -X PATCH repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/PR_NUMBER \
  -f title='<title>' \
  -F body=@/tmp/pr-body.md

Refresh the title and body when follow-up commits materially change scope, approach, breaking behavior, risk, migration, or review expectations. Skip typo-only, formatting-only, and rename-only follow-ups.

Examples

Small change:

The AI Customizations section now starts collapsed so it does not consume
sidebar space before users need it. Expanding it preserves the existing saved
preference behavior.

Breaking contract:

Run logs now emit chunk-level records instead of one skill-level record.
Consumers that read top-level `findings` must iterate over
`chunk.findings` for each record.

Before:

```json
{"skill": "security-review", "findings": [...]}
```

After:

```json
{"schemaVersion": 1, "chunk": {"index": 1, "findings": [...]}}
```

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

1 warning16d5 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub16d

    The pr-writer skill is a specialized tool for generating pull request titles and descriptions. It uses standard git and GitHub CLI tools to analyze changes and follows clear privacy guidelines to exclude sensitive information.

  • Socket16d

    No alerts

  • Snyk16d

    Risk: MEDIUM · 1 issue

  • Runlayer7mo

    1/1 file flagged

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at 412f236. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub yesterday.

Activeupdated 3 months ago
  • Git/VCS
  • github
  • pull-requests
  • conventional-commits
  • code-review
  • sentry

README badge

README badge for getsentry/skills/pr-writer

Creates and refreshes GitHub pull requests with titles and bodies following Sentry's engineering conventions, including type/scope prefixes, reviewer-focused descriptions, and issue references. Use when opening a new PR, updating an existing PR after material changes, or rewriting stale titles and bodies to match the current diff.

Generated from the current SKILL.md.

Does this skill work with GitHub Enterprise or non-GitHub repos?
No. The skill requires GitHub CLI (`gh`) authenticated to a GitHub repo and uses GitHub-specific commands like `gh pr create` and `gh api`. It does not support other git hosts.
Can I use this skill to create a PR from the default branch?
No. The skill explicitly requires all changes to be on a feature branch, not the default branch, before opening a PR.
What issue tracking systems does this skill support?
GitHub issues, Sentry issue IDs (SENTRY-XXXX), and Linear issues (LINEAR-ABC-123). The skill includes syntax for linking or closing issues in the PR body only when the issue ID is already present in commits, branch names, or verified tracker output.
Does this skill refresh an existing PR automatically?
The skill instructs you to refresh an existing PR after material follow-up changes even if not explicitly asked, but only for changes that affect reviewer expectations — not for trivial edits like typos or renames.
What PR title format does this skill enforce?
Conventional commit format: `<type>(<scope>): <subject>` or `<type>: <subject>`, where type is one of feat, fix, ref, perf, docs, test, build, ci, chore, style, meta, license, or revert. No bracketed labels, agent attribution, or vague titles like 'update' or 'fix stuff'.

Generated from the current SKILL.md. These answers refresh after source changes.