All skills
github avatar

/build-evidence-map

@37ade4b official
by githubgithub/awesome-copilot40k stars
5,040

Build an auditable evidence map for a contested technical choice, research synthesis, proposal review, or consequential decision. Use when Copilot must preserve supporting, contradicting, qualifying, and missing evidence with exact source regions instead of collapsing disagreement into prose.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/github/awesome-copilot/build-evidence-map

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

referencesevidence-ladder.md

≈453 tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Evidence ladder

Use the strongest evidence practical for the decision. A higher class can still be stale, irrelevant, or too broad for the nearby claim.

  1. Direct current observation — reproduced behavior, command output, inspected artifact, or measured result.
  2. Authoritative primary source — official specification, dataset, law, documentation, first-party repository, or original research.
  3. Independent corroboration — competent sources with distinct underlying evidence.
  4. Explicit inference — a conclusion whose premises and assumptions are visible in the map.
  5. Weak proxy — related metric, benchmark, anecdote, or test that does not exercise the exact claim.
  6. Unsupported assertion — confidence, repetition, or polished language without evidence.

Source-region test

Before creating an evidence node, answer:

  • What exact sentence, table, command output, page, section, or line range is being relied on?
  • Does it entail the node text, or merely discuss the same subject?
  • Is its date and version appropriate for the claim?
  • Is the evidence independent, or copied from another cited source?
  • What context would reverse or narrow the interpretation?

If the exact region cannot be located, create an unknown node instead of an evidence node.

Edge test

Relation Use when Common counterfeit
supports The source increases reason to accept the target Topical similarity
contradicts Both cannot hold under the same scope and conditions Different dates or populations
qualifies The source narrows scope, strength, or applicability Hiding inconvenient evidence
missing A specific absent fact blocks or could reverse the target Generic “more research needed”

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

1 warning1mo3 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub1mo

    The skill is designed for creating structured evidence maps and is generally secure. It processes information from external URLs and local files, which introduces a surface for indirect prompt injection. It includes local validation scripts and references an external CLI tool, with explicit warnings against implicit tool installation.

  • Socket1mo

    No alerts

  • Snyk1mo

    Risk: MEDIUM · 1 issue

Signed by skilld at 37ade4b. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 20 hours ago.

Activeupdated 2 months ago

README badge

README badge for github/awesome-copilot/build-evidence-map