Verification Report
Summary
Text verified: [Brief description of what was checked] Claims extracted: [N total] Breakdown:
| Rating | Count |
|---|---|
| VERIFIED | |
| PLAUSIBLE | |
| UNVERIFIED | |
| DISPUTED | |
| FABRICATION RISK |
Items requiring attention: [N items rated DISPUTED or FABRICATION RISK]
Flagged Items (Review These First)
Items rated DISPUTED or FABRICATION RISK. These need your attention before you rely on the source material.
[C#] -- [Brief description of the claim]
- Claim: [The specific assertion from the target text]
- Rating: [DISPUTED or FABRICATION RISK]
- Finding: [What the verification found -- what's wrong or suspicious]
- Source: [URL to contradicting or relevant source]
- Recommendation: [What the user should do -- e.g., "Verify this citation in Westlaw" or "Remove this statistic unless you can find a primary source"]
All Claims
Full results for every extracted claim, grouped by confidence rating.
VERIFIED
[C#] -- [Brief description]
- Claim: [The assertion]
- Source: [URL]
- Notes: [Any relevant context about the source]
PLAUSIBLE
[C#] -- [Brief description]
- Claim: [The assertion]
- Notes: [Why this is rated plausible rather than verified]
UNVERIFIED
[C#] -- [Brief description]
- Claim: [The assertion]
- Notes: [What was searched, why nothing was found]
DISPUTED
[C#] -- [Brief description]
- Claim: [The assertion]
- Contradicting source: [URL]
- Details: [What the source says vs. what the claim says]
FABRICATION RISK
[C#] -- [Brief description]
- Claim: [The assertion]
- Pattern: [Which hallucination pattern this matches]
- Details: [Why this is flagged -- e.g., "citation not found in any legal database"]
Internal Consistency
[Any contradictions found within the target text itself, or "No internal contradictions detected."]
What Was Not Checked
[List any claims that could not be evaluated -- paywalled sources, claims requiring specialized databases, unfalsifiable assertions, etc.]
Limitations
- This tool accelerates human verification; it does not replace it.
- Web search results may not include the most recent information or paywalled sources.
- The adversarial review uses the same underlying model that may have produced the original output. It catches many issues but cannot catch all of them.
- A claim rated VERIFIED means a supporting source was found, not that the claim is definitely correct. Sources can be wrong too.
- Claims rated PLAUSIBLE may still be wrong. The absence of contradicting evidence is not proof of accuracy.