All skills
github avatar

/phoenix-evals

@4214189 official
by githubgithub/awesome-copilot40k stars
5,040

Build and run evaluators for AI/LLM applications using Phoenix.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/github/awesome-copilot/phoenix-evals

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

referencesobserve-sampling-python.md

≈604 tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Observe: Sampling Strategies

How to efficiently sample production traces for review.

Strategies

1. Failure-Focused (Highest Priority)

errors = spans_df[spans_df["status_code"] == "ERROR"]
negative_feedback = spans_df[spans_df["feedback"] == "negative"]

2. Outliers

long_responses = spans_df.nlargest(50, "response_length")
slow_responses = spans_df.nlargest(50, "latency_ms")

3. Stratified (Coverage)

# Sample equally from each category
by_query_type = spans_df.groupby("metadata.query_type").apply(
    lambda x: x.sample(min(len(x), 20))
)

4. Metric-Guided

# Review traces flagged by automated evaluators
flagged = spans_df[eval_results["label"] == "hallucinated"]
borderline = spans_df[(eval_results["score"] > 0.3) & (eval_results["score"] < 0.7)]

Building a Review Queue

def build_review_queue(spans_df, max_traces=100):
    queue = pd.concat([
        spans_df[spans_df["status_code"] == "ERROR"],
        spans_df[spans_df["feedback"] == "negative"],
        spans_df.nlargest(10, "response_length"),
        spans_df.sample(min(30, len(spans_df))),
    ]).drop_duplicates("span_id").head(max_traces)
    return queue

Sample Size Guidelines

Purpose Size
Initial exploration 50-100
Error analysis 100+ (until saturation)
Golden dataset 100-500
Judge calibration 100+ per class

Saturation: Stop when new traces show the same failure patterns.

Trace-Level Sampling

When you need whole requests (all spans per trace), use get_traces:

from phoenix.client import Client
from datetime import datetime, timedelta

client = Client()

# Recent traces with full span trees
traces = client.traces.get_traces(
    project_identifier="my-app",
    limit=100,
    include_spans=True,
)

# Time-windowed sampling (e.g., last hour)
traces = client.traces.get_traces(
    project_identifier="my-app",
    start_time=datetime.now() - timedelta(hours=1),
    limit=50,
    include_spans=True,
)

# Filter by session (multi-turn conversations)
traces = client.traces.get_traces(
    project_identifier="my-app",
    session_id="user-session-abc",
    include_spans=True,
)

# Sort by latency to find slowest requests
traces = client.traces.get_traces(
    project_identifier="my-app",
    sort="latency_ms",
    order="desc",
    limit=50,
)

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

No alerts9d4 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub9d

    This skill provides comprehensive documentation and examples for building AI evaluators using Arize Phoenix. No malicious patterns were detected. It follows security best practices by recommending XML delimiters for LLM prompts and uses standard package management for its dependencies.

  • Socket9d

    No alerts

  • Snyk9d

    Risk: LOW · No issues

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at 4214189. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub yesterday.

Activeupdated 2 months ago
Other metadata
compatibility
Requires Phoenix server. Python skills need phoenix and openai packages; TypeScript skills need @arizeai/phoenix-client.
metadata
{
  "author": "oss@arize.com",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "languages": "Python, TypeScript"
}

README badge

README badge for github/awesome-copilot/phoenix-evals

Builds and runs evaluators for LLM applications using Phoenix, supporting code-based checks, LLM-as-judge approaches, and human validation workflows. Includes pre-built evaluators for RAG systems, error analysis, experiment tracking, and production monitoring across Python and TypeScript.

Generated from the current SKILL.md.

Does this skill work with Python and TypeScript?
Yes. Python skills require the phoenix and openai packages; TypeScript skills require @arizeai/phoenix-client. Both require a running Phoenix server.
Can I build custom evaluators or only use pre-built ones?
You can build both code-based evaluators (deterministic logic) and LLM-based evaluators (using an LLM as a judge), with templates and validation support for both.
Does this cover RAG system evaluation?
Yes. The skill includes a dedicated RAG evaluators workflow covering retrieval quality and answer faithfulness.
Can I validate that my evaluators are accurate?
Yes. The skill provides validation references to test your evaluators' accuracy (TPR/TNR targets) against human labels.
What should I do before building evaluators?
The skill recommends starting with error analysis and tracing to observe actual failures, then categorizing them before automating evaluation.

Generated from the current SKILL.md. These answers refresh after source changes.