Triage all open issues and rank by difficulty/impact.
Worktree isolation
Before follow-on edits, follow the worktree isolation contract. It provides the atomic live-agent claim used below.
An existing worktree alone does not prove another agent is active.
wt is the only worktree tool. Never run git worktree add, and never use a harness worktree option such as EnterWorktree or isolation: "worktree". Those write to .claude/worktrees/, which is banned. wt places every worktree at <parent>/<repo>.<branch-slug>.
Triage stays read only and may use the primary checkout. Every follow-on implementation uses a task-owned worktree. Run wt list --format=json. Reuse the task's worktree with wt switch <branch>, or create one with wt switch --create <branch> --base <base>. Read its absolute path from the JSON, then pass that path as workdir to every later command.
Gotchas
- GitHub API rate limits --
gh issue listwith--limit 100+ can hit rate limits on busy repos. If you get a 403, reduce the batch size or add--labelfilters. - Stale issues -- issues older than 6 months with no recent activity are likely stale. Flag them separately rather than ranking alongside active issues.
- Misleading labels -- "good first issue" doesn't always mean low difficulty. Cross-check against the actual description before trusting the label.
- Body truncation --
gh issue list --json bodytruncates long bodies. For issues that need deeper analysis, fetch individually:gh issue view NUMBER --json body. - Duplicate issues -- watch for multiple issues describing the same root cause. Group them and note the canonical issue number.
- Assigned != in progress -- stale assignments are common. Check if the assignee has recent activity on the issue before skipping it.
Data Storage
Track triage history to show deltas between runs:
# After triage, save results
echo "$(date -I) REPO TOTAL_ISSUES QUICK_WINS HIGH_PRIORITY" >> "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA}/triage-history.log"On subsequent runs, read the log and highlight what changed since last triage.
Workflow
Determine repo and filters
- If
$ARGUMENTSprovided, parse it:- Bare value = repo name (e.g.,
nuxt/nuxt) --label <name>= filter by label--limit <n>= override default 100
- Bare value = repo name (e.g.,
- Otherwise auto-detect:
gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q .nameWithOwner
- If
Fetch all open issues
gh issue list --repo <repo> --state open --limit <limit> --json number,title,labels,body,createdAt,author,comments,assigneesParallel batch analysis Split issues into batches of 10 and spawn parallel
haikuclassification agents (one per batch). Classification is cheap, mechanical extraction —haikuis the right tier. If <=10 issues, use a single agent.For a large backlog (50+ issues), drive this with the Workflow tool:
pipelinethe batches through a classify stage (schema below) then a verify stage, so the schema is enforced and the verify pass runs per batch as it completes. This skill's instructions are the opt-in.See references/heuristics.md for the full difficulty/impact scales and signal weighting.
Each agent returns a JSON array. Every entry has this shape. Reject and rerun malformed batches.
{ "number": 123, "difficulty": 2, "impact": 4, "hasRepro": true, "needsCodebaseReview": false, "notes": "Short reason." }Merge results from all agents into unified list.
Adversarially verify the candidate quick wins. A wrong "difficulty 1, impact 4" recommendation costs the user a wasted worktree, so before presenting, spawn a
haikuverifier per issue scored difficulty 1-2 AND impact 3+. Prompt it to refute the score: "Read issue #N. Is this genuinely a <=2-difficulty change with 3+ impact, or is there hidden scope (migration, API surface, cross-cutting state)? Default to downgrading if uncertain." Demote any issue the verifier refutes. Skip this pass for backlogs where no issue clears the quick-win bar.Display table sorted by: has repro (yes first), then impact/difficulty ratio (descending)
# Title Labels Repro Diff Impact Assigned Notes 42 Fix CSS regression bug yes 1 3 1-line fix 17 Add dark mode enhancement n/a 2 4 @dev PR in progress Highlight quick wins -- low difficulty (1-2), impact 2+; those scored impact 3+ have survived the refutation pass
Highlight high priorities -- impact 4-5 regardless of difficulty
Offer task setup for implementation -- every selected issue uses a task-owned
wtworktree. Prompt user with options:- "Create worktrees for quick wins (difficulty 1-2, impact 2+)?"
- "Create worktrees for high priorities (impact 4-5)?"
- "Pick specific issues by number?"
For each selected issue, create an isolated worktree using
wt:wt switch --create fix/<number>-<slug> --base <base>Where
<slug>is a kebab-case short title (first 4-5 words).After creation, run
wt list --format=json. Give each agent the selected worktree's absolutepath.