All skills
jeffallan avatar

/legacy-modernizer

@efebc44
by jeffallanjeffallan/claude-skills12k stars
1,124

Designs incremental migration strategies, identifies service boundaries, produces dependency maps and migration roadmaps, and generates API facade designs for aging codebases. Use when modernizing legacy systems, implementing strangler fig pattern or branch by abstraction, decomposing monoliths, upgrading frameworks or languages, or reducing technical debt without disrupting business operations.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/jeffallan/claude-skills/legacy-modernizer

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

SKILL.md

≈104 tokens always: the name and description. ≈1.3k when used: this file. ≈15k more on demand in 5 files.

Legacy Modernizer

Core Workflow

  1. Assess system — Analyze codebase, dependencies, risks, and business constraints. Produce a dependency map and risk register before proceeding.

    • Validation checkpoint: Confirm all external integrations and data contracts are documented before moving to step 2.
  2. Plan migration — Design an incremental roadmap with explicit rollback strategies per phase. Reference references/system-assessment.md for code analysis templates.

    • Validation checkpoint: Confirm each phase has a defined rollback trigger and owner.
  3. Build safety net — Create characterization tests and monitoring before touching production code. Target 80%+ coverage of existing behavior.

    • Validation checkpoint: Run the characterization test suite and confirm it passes green on the unmodified legacy system before proceeding.
  4. Migrate incrementally — Apply strangler fig pattern with feature flags. Route traffic via a facade; shift load gradually.

    • Validation checkpoint: Verify error rates and latency metrics remain within baseline thresholds after each traffic increment (e.g., 5% → 25% → 50% → 100%).
  5. Validate & iterate — Run full test suite, review monitoring dashboards, and confirm business behavior is preserved before retiring legacy code.

    • Validation checkpoint: New code must be proven stable at 100% traffic for at least one release cycle before legacy path is removed.

Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

Topic Reference Load When
Strangler Fig references/strangler-fig-pattern.md Incremental replacement, facade layer, routing
Refactoring references/refactoring-patterns.md Extract service, branch by abstraction, adapters
Migration references/migration-strategies.md Database, UI, API, framework migrations
Testing references/legacy-testing.md Characterization tests, golden master, approval
Assessment references/system-assessment.md Code analysis, dependency mapping, risk evaluation

Code Examples

Strangler Fig Facade (Python)

# facade.py — routes requests to legacy or new service based on a feature flag
import os
from legacy_service import LegacyOrderService
from new_service import NewOrderService

class OrderServiceFacade:
    def __init__(self):
        self._legacy = LegacyOrderService()
        self._new = NewOrderService()

    def get_order(self, order_id: str):
        if os.getenv("USE_NEW_ORDER_SERVICE", "false").lower() == "true":
            return self._new.fetch(order_id)
        return self._legacy.get(order_id)

Feature Flag Wrapper

# feature_flags.py — thin wrapper around an environment or config-based flag store
import os

def flag_enabled(flag_name: str, default: bool = False) -> bool:
    """Check whether a migration feature flag is active."""
    return os.getenv(flag_name, str(default)).lower() == "true"

# Usage
if flag_enabled("USE_NEW_PAYMENT_GATEWAY"):
    result = new_gateway.charge(order)
else:
    result = legacy_gateway.charge(order)

Characterization Test Template (pytest)

# test_characterization_orders.py
# Captures existing legacy behavior as a golden-master safety net.
import pytest
from legacy_service import LegacyOrderService

service = LegacyOrderService()

@pytest.mark.parametrize("order_id,expected_status", [
    ("ORD-001", "SHIPPED"),
    ("ORD-002", "PENDING"),
    ("ORD-003", "CANCELLED"),
])
def test_order_status_golden_master(order_id, expected_status):
    """Fail loudly if legacy behavior changes unexpectedly."""
    result = service.get(order_id)
    assert result["status"] == expected_status, (
        f"Characterization broken for {order_id}: "
        f"expected {expected_status}, got {result['status']}"
    )

Constraints

MUST DO

  • Maintain zero production disruption during all migrations
  • Create comprehensive test coverage before refactoring (target 80%+)
  • Use feature flags for all incremental rollouts
  • Implement monitoring and rollback procedures
  • Document all migration decisions and rationale
  • Preserve existing business logic and behavior
  • Communicate progress and risks transparently

MUST NOT DO

  • Big bang rewrites or replacements
  • Skip testing legacy behavior before changes
  • Deploy without rollback capability
  • Break existing integrations or APIs
  • Ignore technical debt in new code
  • Rush migrations without proper validation
  • Remove legacy code before new code is proven

Output Templates

When implementing modernization, provide:

  1. Assessment summary (risks, dependencies, approach)
  2. Migration plan (phases, rollback strategy, metrics)
  3. Implementation code (facades, adapters, new services)
  4. Test coverage (characterization, integration, e2e)
  5. Monitoring setup (metrics, alerts, dashboards)

Knowledge Reference

Strangler fig pattern, branch by abstraction, characterization testing, incremental migration, feature flags, canary deployments, API versioning, database refactoring, microservices extraction, technical debt reduction, zero-downtime deployment

Documentation

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

1 alert16d5 checks · Risk CRITICAL
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub16d

    Automated security scanners flagged the skill's documentation URL as blacklisted and identified the main skill file as malicious. Technical analysis confirms the skill includes code for executing system commands (git) and analyzing local files without sanitization, presenting a high risk if deployed on untrusted environments.

  • Socket16d

    No alerts

  • Snyk16d

    Risk: LOW · No issues

  • Runlayer6mo

    4/6 files flagged

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at efebc44. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 2 months ago.

Steadyupdated 5 months ago
Other metadata
metadata
{
  "author": "https://github.com/Jeffallan",
  "version": "1.1.0",
  "domain": "specialized",
  "triggers": "legacy modernization, strangler fig, incremental migration, technical debt, legacy refactoring, system migration, legacy system, modernize codebase",
  "role": "specialist",
  "scope": "architecture",
  "output-format": "code+analysis",
  "related-skills": "test-master, devops-engineer"
}
  • Refactoring
  • legacy-modernization
  • strangler-fig
  • incremental-migration
  • technical-debt
  • monolith-decomposition
  • feature-flags
  • architecture

README badge

README badge for jeffallan/claude-skills/legacy-modernizer

Designs incremental migration strategies and produces dependency maps, service boundaries, and API facades for legacy system modernization. Guides the strangler fig pattern, branch by abstraction, and monolith decomposition with explicit rollback strategies and characterization testing to eliminate technical debt without disrupting production.

Generated from the current SKILL.md.

Does this skill work with languages other than Python?
Yes. The skill provides language-agnostic architectural patterns (strangler fig, branch by abstraction, characterization testing) and includes Python examples, but the core guidance applies to any codebase. You will need to adapt code examples to your language.
What does 'characterization testing' mean in this context?
Characterization tests capture the existing behavior of legacy code as a golden master before refactoring. They serve as a safety net to detect unintended changes during modernization, targeting 80%+ coverage of legacy behavior.
Can I use this skill for a big rewrite instead of incremental migration?
No. The skill explicitly forbids big bang rewrites and requires zero production disruption. It is designed for strangler fig, branch by abstraction, and other incremental patterns only.
Does this skill handle database migrations?
Yes. The skill includes reference guides for database migrations alongside UI, API, and framework migrations, and emphasizes zero-downtime deployment strategies.
What validation checkpoints does the workflow require?
The skill defines five validation checkpoints: documented integrations before planning, defined rollback triggers per phase, characterization tests passing on unmodified legacy code, error rates and latency within baseline after each traffic increment, and new code stability at 100% traffic for at least one release cycle before legacy code removal.

Generated from the current SKILL.md. These answers refresh after source changes.