Stakeholder Handover Ring — Who Passes What To Whom (Infographic)
Best for: showing the stakeholder ring around a decision, where each party hands off to the next Avoid when: the connections are one-directional dependencies (use a dependency graph) Answers: what each party passes on, and in which order the decision travels
infographic sequence-circle-arrows-indexed-card
theme
colorPrimary #2b66c4
palette
- #2b66c4
- #2f9e44
- #f3a33c
- #d1242f
- #7048e8
- #0f9b9b
- #c16f8a
- #7c5a3d
data
title Launch Decision Handovers
desc What each party passes on, in order
sequences
- label Scope
desc Product → Design
- label Flows
desc Design → Engineering
- label Threat model
desc Engineering → Security
- label Runbook gaps
desc Security → Support
- label Field feedback
desc Support → ProductData Shape
sequences — one step per handover, in ring order. label is the artefact that travels (keep it to one
line: the card draws a rule under the label, and a wrapped label sits on top of it), desc names the two
parties. The structure closes the loop with a return arrow, so the last step must hand back to the first.
Key Options
| Option | Effect |
|---|---|
infographic sequence-circle-arrows-indexed-card |
Numbered cards around a ring, with the return arrow |
label / desc |
The artefact, then the parties — both are drawn, unlike a relation label |
sequences |
Step order is the array order; the ring is closed for you |
relation-circle-* |
Use only when a number per node is the story: both variants print one, and neither draws relation labels |
Pitfalls
- ❌ A ring that is really a chain → ✅ if it does not loop, use a plain
sequence-*or dagre layout - ❌ Handover artefacts written as
relations[].label→ ✅ the relation structures draw no edge labels; the words vanish. Use a sequence, wherelabelanddescare rendered - ❌ Nine steps → ✅ six is the practical maximum around a 900×600 circle
- ❌ A
relation-circle-circular-progresswheel with no numbers → ✅ its rings print0%; only use it when each node has a real percentage
Alternatives
| Variant | Use instead |
|---|---|
| Concept relationship map | capability-relationship-map.md |
| Platform dependency topology | platform-dependency-graph.md |
| Escalation ladder | incident-escalation-path.md |