All skills
microsoft avatar

/cloud-solution-architect

@277bb98
by microsoftmicrosoft/skills3.1k stars
351

Transform the agent into a Cloud Solution Architect following Azure Architecture Center best practices. Use when designing cloud architectures, reviewing system designs, selecting architecture styles, applying cloud design patterns, making technology choices, or conducting Well-Architected Framework reviews.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/microsoft/skills/cloud-solution-architect

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

referencesmission-critical.md

≈3.8k tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Mission-Critical Architecture on Azure

Guidance for designing mission-critical workloads on Azure that prioritize cloud-native capabilities to maximize reliability and operational effectiveness.

Target SLO: 99.99% or higher — permitted annual downtime: 52 minutes 35 seconds.

All encompassed design decisions are intended to accomplish this target SLO.

SLO Target Permitted Annual Downtime Typical Use Case
99.9% 8 hours 45 minutes Standard business apps
99.95% 4 hours 22 minutes Important business apps
99.99% 52 minutes 35 seconds Mission-critical workloads
99.999% 5 minutes 15 seconds Safety-critical systems

Key Design Strategies

1. Redundancy in Layers

Deploy redundancy at every layer of the architecture to eliminate single points of failure.

  • Deploy to multiple regions in an active-active model — application distributed across 2+ Azure regions handling active user traffic simultaneously
  • Utilize availability zones for all considered services — distributing components across physically separate datacenters inside a region
  • Choose resources that support global distribution natively
  • Apply zone-redundant configurations for all stateful services
  • Ensure data replication meets RPO requirements across regions

Azure services: Azure Front Door (global routing), Azure Traffic Manager (DNS failover), Azure Cosmos DB (multi-region writes), Azure SQL (geo-replication)

2. Deployment Stamps

Deploy regional stamps as scale units — a logical set of resources that can be independently provisioned to keep up with demand changes.

  • Each stamp is a self-contained scale unit with its own compute, caching, and local state
  • Multiple nested scale units within a stamp (e.g., Frontend APIs and Background processors scale independently)
  • No dependencies between scale units — they only communicate with shared services outside the stamp
  • Scale units are temporary/ephemeral — store persistent system-of-record data only in the replicated database
  • Use stamps for blue-green deployments by rolling out new units, validating, and gradually shifting traffic

Key benefit: Compartmentalization enables independent scaling and fault isolation per region.

3. Reliable and Repeatable Deployments

Apply the principle of Infrastructure as Code (IaC) for version control and standardized operations.

  • Use Terraform or Bicep for infrastructure definition with version control
  • Implement zero-downtime blue/green deployment pipelines — build and release pipelines fully automated
  • Apply environment consistency — use the same deployment pipeline code across production and pre-production environments
  • Integrate continuous validation — automated testing as part of DevOps processes
  • Include synchronized load and chaos testing to validate both application code and underlying infrastructure
  • Deploy stamps as a single operational unit — never partially deploy a stamp

4. Operational Insights

Build comprehensive observability without introducing single points of failure.

  • Use federated workspaces for observability data — monitoring data for global and regional resources stored independently
  • A centralized observability store is NOT recommended (it becomes a single point of failure)
  • Use cross-workspace querying to achieve a unified data sink and single pane of glass for operations
  • Construct a layered health model mapping application health to a traffic light model for contextualizing
  • Health scores calculated for each individual component, then aggregated at user flow level
  • Combine with key non-functional requirements (performance) as coefficients to quantify application health

Design Areas

Each design area must be addressed for a mission-critical architecture.

Design Area Description Key Concerns
Application platform Infrastructure choices and mitigations for potential failure cases AKS vs App Service, availability zones, containerization
Application design Design patterns that allow for scaling and error handling Stateless services, async messaging, queue-based decoupling
Networking and connectivity Network considerations for routing incoming traffic to stamps Global load balancing, WAF, DDoS protection, private endpoints
Data platform Choices in data store technologies Volume, velocity, variety, veracity; active-active vs active-passive
Deployment and testing Strategies for CI/CD pipelines and automation Blue/green deployments, load testing, chaos testing
Health modeling Observability through customer impact analysis Correlated monitoring, traffic light model, health scores
Security Mitigation of attack vectors Microsoft Zero Trust model, identity-based access, encryption
Operational procedures Processes related to runtime operations Deployment SOPs, key management, patching, incident response

Active-Active Multi-Region Architecture

The core topology for mission-critical workloads distributes the application across multiple Azure regions.

Architecture Characteristics

  • Application distributed across 2+ Azure regions handling active user traffic simultaneously
  • Each region contains independent deployment stamps (scale units)
  • Azure Front Door provides global routing, SSL termination, and WAF at the edge
  • Scale units have no cross-dependencies — they communicate only with shared services (e.g., global database, DNS)
  • Persistent data resides only in the replicated database — stamps store no durable local state
  • When scale units are replaced or retired, applications reconnect transparently

Data Replication Strategies

Strategy Writes Reads Consistency Best For
Active-passive (Azure SQL) Single primary region All regions via read replicas Strong Relational data, ACID transactions
Active-active (Cosmos DB) All regions All regions Tunable (5 levels) Document/key-value data, global apps
Write-behind (Redis → SQL) Redis first, async to SQL Redis or SQL Eventual High-throughput writes, rate limiting

Regional Stamp Composition

Each stamp typically includes:

  • Compute tier — App Service or AKS with multiple instances across availability zones
  • Caching tier — Azure Managed Redis for session state, rate limiting, feature flags
  • Configuration — Azure App Configuration for settings (capacity correlates with requests/second)
  • Secrets — Azure Key Vault for certificates and secrets
  • Networking — Virtual network with private endpoints, NSGs, and service endpoints

Health Modeling and Traffic Light Approach

Health modeling provides the foundation for automated operational decisions.

Building the Health Model

  1. Identify user flows — map critical paths through the application (e.g., "user login", "checkout", "search")
  2. Decompose into components — each flow depends on specific compute, data, and network components
  3. Assign health scores — each component reports a health score based on metrics (latency, error rate, saturation)
  4. Aggregate per flow — combine component scores weighted by criticality to produce a flow-level health score
  5. Apply traffic light — map aggregate scores to Green (healthy), Yellow (degraded), Red (unhealthy)

Health Score Coefficients

Factor Metric Examples Weight Guidance
Availability Error rate, HTTP 5xx ratio High — directly impacts users
Performance P95 latency, request duration Medium — affects user experience
Saturation CPU %, memory %, queue depth Medium — indicates future problems
Freshness Data replication lag, cache age Lower — depends on consistency needs

Operational Actions by Health State

State Meaning Automated Action
🟢 Green All components healthy Normal operations
🟡 Yellow Degraded but functional Alert on-call, increase monitoring frequency
🔴 Red Critical failure detected Trigger failover, page on-call, block deployments

Zero-Downtime Deployment (Blue/Green)

Deployment must never cause downtime in a mission-critical system.

Blue/Green Process

  1. Provision new stamp — deploy a complete new scale unit ("green") alongside the existing one ("blue")
  2. Run validation — execute automated smoke tests, integration tests, and synthetic transactions against the green stamp
  3. Canary traffic — route a small percentage of production traffic (e.g., 5%) to the green stamp
  4. Monitor health — compare health scores between blue and green stamps over a defined observation period
  5. Gradual shift — increase traffic to green stamp in increments (5% → 25% → 50% → 100%)
  6. Decommission blue — once green is fully validated, tear down the blue stamp

Key Requirements

  • Build and release pipelines must be fully automated — no manual deployment steps
  • Use the same pipeline code for all environments (dev, staging, production)
  • Each stamp deployed as a single operational unit — never partial
  • Rollback is achieved by shifting traffic back to the previous stamp (still running during validation)
  • Continuous validation runs throughout the deployment, not just at the end

Chaos Engineering and Continuous Validation

Proactive failure testing ensures recovery mechanisms work before real incidents occur.

Chaos Engineering Practices

  • Use Azure Chaos Studio to run controlled experiments against production or pre-production environments
  • Test failure modes: availability zone outage, network partition, dependency failure, CPU/memory pressure
  • Run chaos experiments as part of the CI/CD pipeline — every deployment is validated under fault conditions
  • Synchronized load and chaos testing — inject faults while the system is under realistic load

Validation Checklist

  • Health model detects injected faults within SLO-defined time windows
  • Automated failover completes within target RTO
  • No data loss exceeding target RPO during regional failover
  • Application degrades gracefully (reduced functionality, not total failure)
  • Alerts fire correctly and reach the on-call team
  • Runbooks and automated remediation execute successfully

Application Platform Considerations

Platform Options

Platform Best For Availability Zone Support Complexity
Azure App Service Web apps, APIs, PaaS-first approach Yes (zone-redundant) Low-Medium
AKS Complex microservices, full K8s control Yes (zone-redundant node pools) High
Container Apps Serverless containers, event-driven Yes Medium

Recommendations

  • Prioritize availability zones for all production workloads — spread across physically separate datacenters
  • Containerize workloads for reliability and portability between platforms
  • Ensure all services in a scale unit support availability zones — don't mix zonal and non-zonal services
  • For latency-sensitive or chatty workloads, consider tradeoffs of cross-zone traffic cost and latency

Data Platform Considerations

Choosing a Primary Database

Scenario Recommended Service Deployment Model
Relational data, ACID transactions Azure SQL Active-passive with geo-replication
Global distribution, multi-model Azure Cosmos DB Active-active with multi-region writes
Multiple microservice databases Mixed (polyglot) Per-service database with appropriate model

Azure SQL in Mission-Critical

  • Azure SQL does not natively support active-active concurrent writes in multiple regions
  • Use active-passive strategy: single primary region for writes, read replicas in secondary regions
  • Partial active-active possible at the application tier — route reads to local replicas, writes to primary
  • Configure auto-failover groups for automated regional failover

Azure Managed Redis in Mission-Critical

  • Use within or alongside each scale unit for:
    • Cache data — rebuildable, repopulated on demand
    • Session state — user sessions during scale unit lifetime
    • Rate limit counters — per-user and per-tenant throttling
    • Feature flags — dynamic configuration without redeployment
    • Coordination metadata — distributed locks, leader election
  • Active geo-replication enables Redis data to replicate asynchronously across regions
  • Design cached data as either rebuildable (repopulate without availability impact) or durable auxiliary state (protected by persistence and geo-replication)

Security in Mission-Critical

Zero Trust Principles

  • Verify explicitly — authenticate and authorize based on all available data points (identity, location, device, service)
  • Use least privilege access — limit user access with Just-In-Time and Just-Enough-Access (JIT/JEA)
  • Assume breach — minimize blast radius and segment access, verify end-to-end encryption, use analytics for threat detection

Security Controls

Layer Control Azure Service
Edge DDoS protection, WAF Azure Front Door, Azure DDoS Protection
Identity Managed identities, RBAC Microsoft Entra ID, Azure RBAC
Network Private endpoints, NSGs Azure Private Link, Virtual Network
Data Encryption at rest and in transit Azure Key Vault, TDE, TLS 1.2+
Operations Privileged access management Microsoft Entra PIM, Azure Bastion

Operational Procedures

Key Operational Processes

Process Description Automation Level
Deployment Blue/green with automated validation Fully automated
Scaling Stamp provisioning and decommissioning Automated with manual approval gates
Key rotation Certificate and secret rotation Automated via Key Vault policies
Patching OS and runtime updates Automated via platform (PaaS) or pipeline (IaaS)
Incident response Detection, triage, mitigation, resolution Semi-automated (alert → runbook → human)
Capacity planning Forecast demand, pre-provision stamps Manual with data-driven analysis

Runbook Requirements

  • All operational runbooks must be tested in pre-production with the same chaos/load scenarios as production
  • Automated remediation preferred over manual intervention for known failure modes
  • Runbooks must include rollback procedures for every change type
  • Post-incident reviews (blameless) must feed back into health model and chaos experiment improvements

Source: Azure Architecture Center

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

1 warning17d5 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub17d

    This skill provides architectural guidance based on the Azure Architecture Center. It consists of educational content and design frameworks without any executable code or scripts.

  • Socket17d

    No alerts

  • Snyk17d

    Risk: LOW · No issues

  • Runlayer7mo

    5/9 files flagged

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at 277bb98. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 20 hours ago.

Activeupdated 7 months ago

README badge

README badge for microsoft/skills/cloud-solution-architect