Data Writing Guide
Writing about numbers
Contextualise every number. A number without context is noise. Add:
- Comparison (vs last period, vs target, vs benchmark)
- Direction and magnitude ("up 12%", not "12%")
- Significance ("material" or "within normal variation")
Round appropriately. Report to the precision that is meaningful:
- Revenue to the nearest thousand (or million at scale)
- Rates to 1–2 decimal places
- Counts to the nearest whole number
- Very small percentages (e.g., error rates) to 2–3 significant figures
Avoid false precision. "Revenue grew by 7.43821%" signals you don't understand the uncertainty in your data.
Sentence-level guidance
Active voice for findings, passive for process.
- Finding: "Conversion rate declined 3 points in EMEA" (active — clear subject)
- Process: "Users were segmented by plan tier" (passive — subject is the analyst, irrelevant)
Numbers at the start of a sentence: Spell them out. "Twelve percent of users…" not "12% of users…" at the start of a sentence.
Quantify comparisons. "Revenue increased significantly" is vague. "Revenue increased 18% — twice the prior-quarter rate" is precise.
One idea per sentence. Long compound sentences that combine a finding, its context, and a recommendation confuse readers. Split them.
Describing trends
| Instead of | Write |
|---|---|
| "Revenue was higher" | "Revenue grew 15% YoY" |
| "Conversion went down a bit" | "Conversion declined 1.2 percentage points" |
| "There was a big spike" | "Sessions spiked 3× on Tuesday, returning to baseline Wednesday" |
| "The numbers are good" | "Q3 revenue hit $4.2M, 8% above the $3.9M target" |
Framing uncertainty
Analytical conclusions always carry uncertainty. Be explicit:
- "This is consistent with…" — correlation, not causation
- "The data suggests…" — directional, not confirmed
- "We cannot rule out…" — acknowledge alternative explanations
- "We are confident that…" — reserve for validated findings
- "Subject to [assumption X]" — flag load-bearing assumptions
Never use false certainty to make a finding sound more compelling.
Chart titles and annotations
Chart title = the finding, not the description.
- Description: "Monthly Revenue by Region, 2024"
- Finding: "EMEA revenue declined every month in Q4 2024"
Annotation placement:
- Annotate the anomaly, not the obvious pattern
- Use a single callout box; multiple annotations create visual noise
- Keep annotation text under 10 words
Executive vs analytical writing style
| Dimension | Executive | Analytical |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 150–300 words | 500–2,000 words |
| Lead | Conclusion first | Context → finding |
| Numbers | 2–3 key metrics, rounded | Full tables, precise |
| Uncertainty | Omitted or one caveat | Explicit throughout |
| Tone | Decisive | Measured |
| Charts | 1 maximum | Multiple |