All skills
nvidia avatar

/cudaq-guide

@46293cb
by NVIDIA Corporationnvidia/skills3.5k stars
424

Use for CUDA-Q setup, simulation targets, QPU access, and @cudaq.kernel authoring guidance.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/nvidia/skills/cudaq-guide

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

BENCHMARK.md

≈2.3k tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Skill Benchmark: cudaq-guide

✅ Overall verdict: PASS — Recommended for publication

Publication Recommendation

Recommended for publication based on the completed evaluation evidence in this report.

Evaluation Metadata

  • Skill: cudaq-guide
  • Evaluation date: 2026-09-11
  • Evaluator version: 1.5.6
  • Agents: Claude Code (aws/anthropic/bedrock-claude-opus-4-8), Codex (openai/openai/gpt-5.5)
  • Tasks: 13 evaluation tasks (10 positive, 3 negative)
  • Dataset digest: sha256:7884d2878ed008a3969a7668a02fb2f9fda8e70495368a69ca8bf4ce1f6071dd (skill-evaluator-dataset-snapshot/1)
  • Attempts per task: 3
  • Environment: k8s-sandbox
  • Tier 2 evidence: required for publication
  • Tier 3 evidence: required for publication

Each task attempt ran in its own isolated sandbox pod.

What This Report Answers

The three-tier evaluation checks whether the skill:

  • is safe to use;
  • produces correct answers;
  • is discovered and activated when needed;
  • helps the agent complete the user's goal and expected workflow; and
  • avoids wasted skill and tool usage.

Results at a Glance

Measure Claude Code (Baseline → Skill Uplift) Codex (Baseline → Skill Uplift)
Overall 93.6% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable 89.2% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable
Security 100.0% → 100.0% (±0.0 points) 85.7% → 92.3% (+6.6 points)
Correctness 92.3% → 98.5% (+6.2 points) 90.0% → 98.5% (+8.5 points)
Discoverability 97.5% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable 92.0% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable
Effectiveness 69.2% → 79.9% (+10.7 points) 66.0% → 86.1% (+20.1 points)
Efficiency 91.9% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable 77.1% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable

How to read this table: baseline is the same task attempted without the target skill. Scores are rounded to one decimal; threshold-adjacent values use additional precision so their displayed band matches the verdict. Uplift is derived from those displayed scores and shown in percentage points.

Example: 47.0% → 92.0% (+45.0 points) means the skill-assisted run scored 92.0%, 45.0 percentage points above its 47.0% no-skill baseline.

A partial dimension was calculated from only the available configured signals; review the detailed report before relying on it.

Token Usage

Actual Tier 3 execution usage is reported for every observed agent/case pair and both conditions.

Agent Dataset case With skill Without skill Delta Change Coverage
claude-code All cases 1,666,118 1,251,598 +414,520 +33.12% skill 13/13; base 13/13
claude-code cudaq-guide-applications-001 96,575 30,095 +66,480 +220.90% skill 1/1; base 1/1
claude-code cudaq-guide-author-adjoint-001 103,562 65,498 +38,064 +58.11% skill 1/1; base 1/1
claude-code cudaq-guide-author-api-001 102,254 30,416 +71,838 +236.18% skill 1/1; base 1/1
claude-code cudaq-guide-author-constraint-001 102,286 133,926 -31,640 -23.62% skill 1/1; base 1/1
claude-code cudaq-guide-gpu-sim-001 96,542 31,244 +65,298 +208.99% skill 1/1; base 1/1
claude-code cudaq-guide-install-001 96,783 31,099 +65,684 +211.21% skill 1/1; base 1/1
claude-code cudaq-guide-neg-001 29,099 29,092 +7 +0.02% skill 1/1; base 1/1
claude-code cudaq-guide-neg-002 29,417 29,600 -183 -0.62% skill 1/1; base 1/1
claude-code cudaq-guide-neg-003 155,890 191,018 -35,128 -18.39% skill 1/1; base 1/1
claude-code cudaq-guide-parallelize-001 96,696 31,451 +65,245 +207.45% skill 1/1; base 1/1
claude-code cudaq-guide-qpu-001 171,868 162,627 +9,241 +5.68% skill 1/1; base 1/1
claude-code cudaq-guide-route-qiskit-001 137,822 124,365 +13,457 +10.82% skill 1/1; base 1/1
claude-code cudaq-guide-test-program-001 447,324 361,167 +86,157 +23.86% skill 1/1; base 1/1
codex All cases 1,861,622 1,290,210 N/A N/A skill 13/13; base 14/14
codex cudaq-guide-applications-001 59,610 32,305 +27,305 +84.52% skill 1/1; base 1/1
codex cudaq-guide-author-adjoint-001 64,364 94,709 N/A N/A skill 1/1; base 2/2
codex cudaq-guide-author-api-001 45,999 24,417 +21,582 +88.39% skill 1/1; base 1/1
codex cudaq-guide-author-constraint-001 46,233 44,952 +1,281 +2.85% skill 1/1; base 1/1
codex cudaq-guide-gpu-sim-001 78,984 17,935 +61,049 +340.39% skill 1/1; base 1/1
codex cudaq-guide-install-001 75,783 37,171 +38,612 +103.88% skill 1/1; base 1/1
codex cudaq-guide-neg-001 13,272 13,234 +38 +0.29% skill 1/1; base 1/1
codex cudaq-guide-neg-002 13,380 13,308 +72 +0.54% skill 1/1; base 1/1
codex cudaq-guide-neg-003 532,599 598,297 -65,698 -10.98% skill 1/1; base 1/1
codex cudaq-guide-parallelize-001 50,307 25,488 +24,819 +97.38% skill 1/1; base 1/1
codex cudaq-guide-qpu-001 87,178 46,231 +40,947 +88.57% skill 1/1; base 1/1
codex cudaq-guide-route-qiskit-001 46,712 44,623 +2,089 +4.68% skill 1/1; base 1/1
codex cudaq-guide-test-program-001 747,201 297,540 +449,661 +151.13% skill 1/1; base 1/1
ALL AGENTS Dataset aggregate 3,527,740 2,541,808 N/A N/A skill 26/26; base 27/27

Prompt tokens include cached reads, so total tokens are prompt + completion (cached is not added twice). The Efficiency score uses (prompt - cached) + completion. N/A means the relevant trajectory counters were not available; coverage is never estimated.

Tier Status

Tier Purpose Status Evidence
Tier 1 Static validation PASSED WITH OBSERVATIONS 11 validator(s); 4 finding(s)
Tier 2 Semantic deduplication PASSED 2 validator(s); 0 finding(s)
Tier 3 Live agent evaluation PASS 2 agent(s); 13 task(s)

Findings and Observations

<details> <summary>Show detailed findings and successful checks</summary>
  • MEDIUM SCHEMA/frontmatter_field_placement: Root field 'author' is ignored; use 'metadata.author' (skills/cudaq-guide/SKILL.md)
  • MEDIUM SCHEMA/frontmatter_field_placement: Root field 'tags' is ignored; use 'metadata.tags' (skills/cudaq-guide/SKILL.md)
  • MEDIUM SCHEMA/frontmatter_field_placement: Root field 'version' is ignored; use 'metadata.version' (skills/cudaq-guide/SKILL.md)
  • MEDIUM SCHEMA/body_recommended_section: Missing recommended section: '## Examples' (skills/cudaq-guide/SKILL.md)
</details>

Scoring Methodology

<details> <summary>Show dimension definitions, source signals, and thresholds</summary>
Dimension Question Scored signals
Security Is it safe to use? security (100%)
Correctness Is the answer correct? accuracy (100%)
Discoverability Was the right skill loaded when needed? skill_execution (100%)
Effectiveness Did the skill help complete the task? goal_accuracy (50%) + behavior_check (50%)
Efficiency Did it avoid wasted tool calls and token usage? skill_efficiency (50%) + token_efficiency (50%)
  • Dimension bands: PASS at 50% or above; NEUTRAL from 40% to below 50%; FAIL below 40%.
  • Overall Tier 3 lift: PASS at +5 points or more; FAIL at -10 points or less; values between those bands are NEUTRAL.
  • Overall verdict: PASS only when every configured dimension passes for at least one supported agent. Lift is reported as diagnostic evidence and does not override this gate.
  • The 50% attempt pass threshold is a separate per-task gate; it is not the dimension pass threshold.
  • Effectiveness is the equal-weight mean of goal completion (goal_accuracy) and expected workflow adherence (behavior_check).
  • Efficiency is 50% tool-call productivity (the backward-compatible skill_efficiency wire id) and 50% token_efficiency. Positive-case skill routing is scored under Discoverability, not Efficiency; a negative case without a routing target is N/A. N/A sources are omitted, remaining weights are renormalized, and the dimension is marked partial.

Signals present in this run:

  • security (Security): unsafe operations, secret leakage, and unauthorized access.
  • skill_execution (Skill Execution): whether the expected skill was selected, decoys were avoided, and the workflow executed.
  • skill_efficiency (Tool Productivity): tool-call productivity (legacy wire id; routing is scored under Discoverability).
  • accuracy (Accuracy): final-answer correctness against the reference answer.
  • goal_accuracy (Goal Accuracy): whether the user's goal was achieved.
  • behavior_check (Behavior Check): whether the expected workflow behavior was followed.
  • token_efficiency (Token Efficiency): actual uncached prompt plus completion usage (50% of Efficiency).
</details>

Freshness

Regenerate this benchmark when the skill, evaluation dataset, target agent/model, evaluator version, environment, or scoring policy changes.

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

No alerts19d3 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub19d

    The cudaq-guide skill is an onboarding tool for the NVIDIA CUDA-Q platform, providing instructions for installation, quantum programming, and hardware connectivity. It follows security best practices by advising environment-variable-based secret management and links to official documentation.

  • Socket19d

    No alerts

  • Snyk19d

    Risk: LOW · No issues

Signed by skilld at 46293cb. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub yesterday.

Activeupdated 3 weeks ago
title
CUDA-Q Guide
version
1.1.2
author
CUDA-Q Team <cuda-quantum@nvidia.com>
Other metadata
tags
[
  "cuda-quantum",
  "quantum-computing",
  "onboarding",
  "getting-started",
  "authoring",
  "kernels",
  "nvidia"
]
tools
[
  "Read",
  "Glob",
  "Grep"
]
compatibility
Python 3.10+, C++ 20
metadata
{
  "author": "CUDA-Q Team <cuda-quantum@nvidia.com>",
  "tags": [
    "cuda-quantum",
    "quantum-computing",
    "onboarding",
    "getting-started",
    "nvidia"
  ],
  "languages": [
    "python",
    "c++"
  ],
  "domain": "quantum"
}

README badge

README badge for nvidia/skills/cudaq-guide