All skills
nvidia avatar

/doca-erasure-coding

@f64fa0e
by NVIDIA Corporationnvidia/skills3.5k stars
424

Use this skill when the user is doing hands-on DOCA Erasure Coding programming on a BlueField DPU, ConnectX NIC, or host — bringing up a doca_ec context, picking among the create / recover / update tasks, choosing matrix type / N / K / block size, querying doca_ec_cap_* before sizing, setting doca_mmap src/dst permissions, or debugging DOCA_ERROR_* returns from doca_ec_task_*. Trigger even when the user does not name "DOCA Erasure Coding" or "Reed-Solomon" — typical implicit phrasings include "one data block changed, how do I refresh parity without re-encoding", "a disk failed and 2 parity blocks are gone, can I rebuild", "RAID-6 resilience across 12 disks", "my doca_ec_task_create returns NOT_PERMITTED", or "is this N+K layout still recoverable". Refuse and route elsewhere for non-Reed-Solomon codes (fountain / LDPC / raptor), pure-replication designs, network FEC, or other DOCA accelerator libraries (SHA / Compress / AES-GCM / DMA) — those belong to other skills.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/nvidia/skills/doca-erasure-coding

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

TASKS.md

≈8.1k tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

DOCA Erasure Coding workflows

Where to start: The verbs run configure → build → modify → run → test → debug. Skip ahead only when the user is already past a verb. The ## test verb is an iterative loop (cap check → permission cross-check → known-vector recover smoke → update smoke → small-bulk → full-bulk → loop back if a task-type or sizing assumption changed), not a one-shot pass — see the eval-loop overlay in ## test below.

Read this file when the loader sent you here from SKILL.md. For the underlying capability surface, the three task types (create / recover / update), the matrix-type + N + K + block-size configuration surface, per-task capability-query rules, error taxonomy, observability, and safety / path-selection policy, see CAPABILITIES.md. For the cross-library DOCA patterns layered under everything below (the universal lifecycle, the cross-library DOCA_ERROR_* taxonomy, the modify-a-shipped-sample workflow), see doca-programming-guide.

Each verb below describes the shape of the workflow, not a copy-paste recipe. The agent's job is to walk the user through the steps in order, verifying preconditions before recommending the next call.

configure

Goal: bring up a DOCA Erasure Coding context on a host or BlueField and confirm the device's accelerator supports the task type(s), block size, N + K layout, and matrix type the user actually intends to use.

Steps the agent should walk the user through:

  1. Confirm the installed DOCA version. Use the procedure in doca-version TASKS.md ## configure. Quote the version observed (pkg-config --modversion doca-erasure-coding, then doca_caps --version); do not assume "latest". The four-way match rule lives in doca-version CAPABILITIES.md ## Version compatibility; if the observed sources disagree, route there before any EC diagnosis.
  2. Discover the device capability surface for Erasure Coding. Run doca_caps --list-devs (per doca-caps) to see which devices are visible, then run the per-doca_devinfo doca_ec_cap_* queries against the candidate device. Record at minimum: doca_ec_cap_task_create_is_supported(devinfo), doca_ec_cap_task_recover_is_supported(devinfo), doca_ec_cap_task_update_is_supported(devinfo), doca_ec_cap_task_galois_mul_is_supported(devinfo) (the 4th public task — bundle previously omitted this row), doca_ec_cap_get_max_block_size(devinfo), doca_ec_cap_get_max_buf_list_len(devinfo, &max_buf_list_len), and a per-variant doca_ec_matrix_create() / _create_from_raw() attempt against the active device to enumerate matrix types the device advertises. The capability surface to compare against lives in CAPABILITIES.md ## Capabilities and modes.
  3. Confirm Erasure Coding is the right primitive for this workload at all. Per the path-selection bullets in CAPABILITIES.md ## Safety policy, doca-erasure-coding is the right answer ONLY for storage-domain resilience workloads (RAID-6-style block layouts, distributed file system parity, object-storage erasure-coded buckets). For a network-FEC problem, a small-cluster replication problem, or a non-Reed-Solomon coding scheme, doca-erasure-coding is the wrong primitive — route the user back to the correct primitive (replication for small clusters; CPU library for non-RS schemes; DOCA networking libraries for wire-side problems) instead of bringing up a doca_ec context.
  4. Pick the task type(s) to enable. Create (doca_ec_task_create) for first-time encoding of N data → K redundancy; recover (doca_ec_task_recover) for reconstruction workers; update (doca_ec_task_update) for in-place editors that touch one source block at a time. A user who describes editing one source block in an existing N + K layout should be steered to update, not to a fresh create — re-encoding all N data blocks just to refresh K parity is linear-in-N work the update task is designed to avoid. The task-type table lives in CAPABILITIES.md ## Capabilities and modes.
  5. Pick the coding parameters: matrix type, N, K, block size. Matrix type must be in the variant set the device advertises via successful doca_ec_matrix_create() / _create_from_raw() constructor (the public header does NOT ship a doca_ec_cap_get_matrix_* family — do not assume Vandermonde is universally available). N + K must satisfy N + K ≤ doca_ec_cap_get_max_buf_list_len(devinfo, &max_buf_list_len). Block size must satisfy block_size ≤ doca_ec_cap_get_max_block_size(devinfo); ALL blocks in a single task share this block size. The K choice reflects the durability target (the layout tolerates any K simultaneous block losses); the agent should ask the user for the durability target rather than picking K silently.
  6. Configure the EC instance. Mandatory before doca_ctx_start(): enable at least one task type (doca_ec_task_create_set_conf / _recover_set_conf / _update_set_conf, each with its success and error completion callbacks plus its max-num-tasks budget); commit the four coding parameters (matrix type, N, K, block size) per the device cap query in step 2; set source mmap permissions (doca_mmap_set_permissions to include DOCA_ACCESS_FLAG_LOCAL_READ_ONLY) on EVERY source buffer (N data buffers for create / update; up to N + K surviving buffers for recover); set destination mmap permissions (DOCA_ACCESS_FLAG_LOCAL_READ_WRITE) on EVERY destination buffer (K redundancy buffers for create; up to K recovered buffers for recover; K refreshed parity buffers for update); confirm every buffer length equals the configured block size. Per the matrix in CAPABILITIES.md ## Safety policy.
  7. Sanity check before any task submission. Confirm with the user: which task type(s), matrix type, N, K, block size, and the buffer count on each side. Run a known-vector recover smoke (encode a tiny N + K layout from a fixed input, drop one block, recover, bit-compare against the original) before any real storage data flows. If any step fails with a DOCA_ERROR_*, route through the error taxonomy in CAPABILITIES.md ## Error taxonomy before retrying.

For the canonical DOCA universal lifecycle that underlies steps 4-7, see doca-programming-guide TASKS.md ## configure. This skill adds the EC overlay; do not re-explain the lifecycle here.

build

Goal: produce a binary that links DOCA Erasure Coding against the user's installed DOCA, using the canonical cross-library build pattern.

The build pattern for any DOCA C/C++ consumer is identical across libraries — pkg-config for include + link flags, meson or CMake as the build system — and is fully documented in doca-programming-guide TASKS.md ## build. This skill carries only the EC-specific overlay:

Slot Value for Erasure Coding Why it matters
pkg-config module name doca-erasure-coding The library's .pc file installed by the DOCA host packages. Wrong module name = pkg-config: Package 'doca-erasure-coding' was not found
Required runtime libs libdoca-common, libdoca-erasure-coding, plus whatever pkg-config --libs doca-erasure-coding resolves transitively EC depends on Core; the link line should not pull in unrelated DOCA libraries
Header check The public header that pkg-config --cflags for this artifact resolves to actually exists on disk at the path pkg-config reports (do not hardcode the include path) If pkg-config --cflags doca-erasure-coding resolves but the include is missing, the install is partial — route to doca-version TASKS.md ## debug layer 2
Minimum required DOCA version Query with pkg-config --modversion doca-erasure-coding; never hardcode in build files Cross-version build/runtime mixing breaks per CAPABILITIES.md ## Version compatibility

For non-C consumers (Rust, Go, Python), the link surface is the same *.so files; the FFI wrapper layer is the language-specific binding and is out of scope for this skill — but the four slots above are still the load-bearing inputs the wrapper needs.

modify

Goal: take a shipped DOCA EC sample as the verified starting point and apply a minimum-diff modification to express the user's intent.

The universal modify-a-shipped-sample workflow lives in doca-programming-guide TASKS.md ## modify. Use it as-is. The EC-specific overlay is the modify-from-sample schema fill — the slots the agent must elicit from the user before recommending any code-level edit:

Slot What the agent asks the user EC-specific consideration
1. Starting sample Which sample under /opt/mellanox/doca/samples/doca_erasure_coding/? Pick the closest in task direction (create vs recover vs update) to the user's intent. Do NOT bridge across directions — a smaller diff is always safer than a re-architecture. A user editing one source block at a time should start from an update sample, not from a create sample with the encode ripped out
2. Task type(s) added or removed Which of the three task types — create, recover, update? Each enabled task needs its own doca_ec_task_*_set_conf call before doca_ctx_start(), plus its matching cap-query in ## configure step 2. Removing an unused task type from a sample shrinks the configuration surface and is recommended for single-purpose pipelines
3. Matrix-type change Switching the Reed-Solomon matrix variant? Re-attempt doca_ec_matrix_create() (or _from_raw()) against the active doca_dev for the new variant; constructor failure = "not supported on this device." The public header does NOT ship a doca_ec_cap_get_matrix_* family. Matrix-type drift between configure and submit returns DOCA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED
4. N + K layout change Changing the number of data or redundancy blocks? Confirm N + K ≤ doca_ec_cap_get_max_buf_list_len(devinfo, &max_buf_list_len). Changing K changes the durability target (tolerates K simultaneous losses); the agent should surface that trade-off rather than picking K silently
5. Block-size change Changing the per-block size? Confirm block_size ≤ doca_ec_cap_get_max_block_size(devinfo). ALL N + K buffers in a single task share this block size; mismatched block sizes within a task return DOCA_ERROR_INVALID_VALUE at submit. Resize every buffer, not just one
6. Permissions on the extra buffers Are the source mmaps RO and destination mmaps RW on EVERY block (not just the first)? EC tasks have multiple source / destination buffers (N + K total per layout); a missing permission flag on ANY one of them surfaces as DOCA_ERROR_NOT_PERMITTED. Over-broad permissions are a silent security regression
7. Build manifest Keep the sample's existing meson.build (which already wires pkg-config doca-erasure-coding)? Yes. Do not switch to a hand-rolled Makefile for "simplicity" — it removes the version-check rail

The agent emits an intent description + the filled slots; the actual unified diff against the sample source is produced by the modify-from-sample renderer (deferred to a future round, per doca-programming-guide TASKS.md ## modify). Until the renderer ships, the agent must walk the user through the diff line-by-line against the sample source they read on disk, and have the user paste back the result for validation.

run

Goal: actually execute the built binary against the user's installed DOCA on a host or BlueField, with a real input.

Steps the agent should walk the user through:

  1. Confirm the device is reachable. EC runs on a single side (no peer); the only env-side requirement is that the doca_dev the binary opens corresponds to a device whose accelerator the user expects. Mismatched doca_dev selection (opening a NIC without the requested EC task on its accelerator) returns DOCA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED at task submit, not at open. Re-quote the output of doca_caps --list-devs (doca-caps) and confirm the device the binary opens is the same one the cap-query ran against.
  2. Run the known-vector recover smoke first. A binary that encodes a tiny N + K layout from a fixed input, simulates losing one block, runs recover, and bit-compares the recovered block against the original — that is the cheapest correctness signal. Do not bulk-encode storage data before this passes. If the user's workflow includes update, run an update smoke (encode → update one block → re-encode the new state → compare parity byte-for-byte) as the second smoke.
  3. Capture the structured log. Set DOCA_LOG_LEVEL=trace for the first run (see doca-debug CAPABILITIES.md ## Observability). This is the cheapest way to make the lifecycle and task-submit transitions visible on first failure.
  4. Capture the completion events on the PE. A run that produces no completion events but doesn't error is almost always a missed doca_pe_progress() call. Confirm the progress engine is being driven on the main thread.

test

Performance harness routing. For throughput / latency measurement on the configured EC context (or for cross-library comparison against the other DOCA crypto primitives), route the user to doca-bench TASKS.md ## test — doca-bench is the cross-library performance harness with documented warm-up / steady-state / outlier semantics, and it explicitly supports Erasure-Coding. The iteration loop below stays the correctness harness; doca-bench is the performance harness.

Goal: prove the configured EC context can actually produce correct parity (create), correctly reconstructed blocks (recover), and correctly refreshed parity (update), at the user's intended throughput, on the user's hardware, and that the task selection, matrix type, N + K, block size, and permission set were right.

This is a loop, not a one-shot pass. Each iteration narrows either the task type, the matrix type, N + K, the block size, the permission set, or the path-selection assumption. The loop terminates when either (a) the user's intended workload produces correct output end-to-end with acceptable throughput, or (b) the agent has narrowed the failure cause to a layer outside DOCA Erasure Coding itself (driver / firmware / device) and escalated to the matching skill.

Iteration shape:

  1. Capability re-check. Re-run doca_ec_cap_task_create_is_supported(devinfo), _task_recover_is_supported(devinfo), _task_update_is_supported(devinfo), doca_ec_cap_get_max_block_size(devinfo), doca_ec_cap_get_max_buf_list_len(devinfo), and the doca_ec_matrix_create() constructor success per variant against the active doca_devinfo. If any required task type or matrix type returns false / unexpected → that's the answer; the user's device or DOCA version does not support the requested config. Update the intent or update the install.
  2. Permission cross-check. Compare the configured source + destination mmap permissions against the matrix in CAPABILITIES.md ## Safety policy on EVERY one of the N + K buffers (not just the first). Mismatches surface as DOCA_ERROR_NOT_PERMITTED on the first task submission, not at configure time.
  3. Known-vector recover smoke. Encode a small fixed N + K layout (e.g. N = 4, K = 2, block_size = 4 KiB), drop one block, run recover, and bit-compare the recovered block against the original. If the recovered block differs, the configuration is wrong — do not proceed to bulk input. The most common bugs at this step are wrong matrix type (asked for Vandermonde, configured Cauchy or vice versa), wrong N or K, and source / destination buffer swap.
  4. Update smoke (if update is in scope). Encode a small fixed N + K layout, update one data block (changing its contents), then re-encode the modified data via create from scratch and compare the two parity sets byte-for-byte. They must match — if they don't, the update task is configured wrong (most commonly: wrong matrix type, wrong index identification of the changed block, or stale source buffer wiring).
  5. Completion drain. Confirm completion events arrive on the PE for every submitted task. Submitted but no completion is the most expensive class of bug to discover late; confirm it on the known-vector smoke before bulk submissions.
  6. Small-bulk test. Submit a small series of EC tasks at block sizes approaching _get_max_block_size and N + K layouts approaching _get_max_num_blocks but staying under both ceilings; verify recover round-trips (encode → intentionally drop K blocks → recover → bit-compare) and update consistency (update → re-encode → compare parity). Throughput numbers come from this step; correctness comes from steps 3 and 4.
  7. Full-bulk run. Once the small-bulk passes, scale up to the user's intended dataset size and submission rate. Watch for DOCA_ERROR_AGAIN (drain the PE before retrying) and for DOCA_ERROR_INVALID_VALUE (a block-size or N + K boundary was crossed — re-narrow to the cap-query axis).
  8. Negative test. Once the positive path works, intentionally request a task type the device should NOT support (per step 1), a matrix type outside the variant set advertised via doca_ec_matrix_create() constructor success, a block size larger than _get_max_block_size, an N + K layout larger than _get_max_num_blocks, or a recover task with more than K missing blocks; confirm the failure is the expected DOCA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED / DOCA_ERROR_INVALID_VALUE. This validates the agent's capability-discovery is itself correct.

Eval-loop overlay — why this is a loop, not a one-shot pass:

Iteration trigger What it looks like What changes next iteration
DOCA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED on a task we expected to work The doc page lists the task but the cap query returns false The agent quoted the library surface; the device capability per doca_devinfo is the real gate. Re-narrow to the device-level query for the specific task type.
DOCA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED on the configured matrix type Configure accepts the matrix-type enum but submit (or set_conf) returns NOT_SUPPORTED The matrix variant is not supported by the active device's accelerator. Re-attempt doca_ec_matrix_create() (or _from_raw()) per variant the user wants and re-pick from those that succeed; the public header does NOT ship a doca_ec_cap_get_matrix_* family.
DOCA_ERROR_INVALID_VALUE on first submit Block size larger than _get_max_block_size, OR N + K larger than _get_max_num_blocks, OR mismatched block sizes between source / destination buffers in a single task Re-size the buffer using the cap-query output (block size) or re-narrow the layout (N + K). Confirm every block in the task is the same size. The error is sizing-vs-cap mismatch, not corruption.
DOCA_ERROR_INVALID_VALUE on a recover task Recover request lists more than K missing blocks The layout is unrecoverable. Stop; do not invent a workaround. Restore from another replica (if the system layers replication on top of EC) or accept the data loss.
Recover smoke produces wrong byte content Configuration accepted but the recovered block does not match the original Wrong matrix type, wrong N + K, or source / destination buffer swap. Re-check the matrix type in the _set_conf call, re-check the N and K against the device cap, and re-check the source / destination wiring before any other diagnosis.
Update smoke produces parity that disagrees with re-encode Update task accepted, but the refreshed parity does not match the parity a fresh create would produce Wrong matrix type, wrong index identification of the changed source block, or stale source buffer wiring. Walk the update inputs (which source block changed, what was its old content, what is its new content) before any other diagnosis.
Submitted task produces no completion doca_task_submit() returned DOCA_SUCCESS; the PE produces nothing The PE is not being progressed. Add a doca_pe_progress() call in the main loop.
Bulk submit returns DOCA_ERROR_AGAIN First M submissions succeed, then AGAIN The task queue is full. Drain completions between bursts via doca_pe_progress(), or raise the configured queue depth at configure time.
User asks "I changed one block, should I run create again?" The user's instinct is to re-encode N data → K parity from scratch Route to doca_ec_task_update; re-encoding is wasteful when one source block changed. This is a workflow-design correction, not a bug.

Loop termination: stop iterating once two consecutive iterations of the same kind don't change anything — that means the cause is below DOCA Erasure Coding. Escalate to doca-debug TASKS.md ## debug with the captured cap-query snapshot + recover smoke diff as evidence.

debug

Goal: when a DOCA EC call returns a DOCA_ERROR_* (or the program produces no completion event), narrow the cause to a specific layer and act on it.

The cross-library debug ladder lives in doca-debug TASKS.md ## debug. Walk through it in order — install → version → build → link → runtime → program → driver — before recommending EC-specific fixes. This skill's overlay names the EC-specific manifestation at layers 5 (runtime) and 6 (program):

Layer 5 (runtime) — EC overlay.

  • Walk the lifecycle: was the context started? Were the task(s) enabled before start (doca_ec_task_*_set_conf before doca_ctx_start())? Submitting before the requested task is enabled returns DOCA_ERROR_BAD_STATE, not a clear symptom.
  • Confirm the PE is being progressed. No completion events is almost always a missing doca_pe_progress() in the user's main loop.
  • Confirm EVERY source and destination mmap is still alive at submit time (EC has N + K buffers per task, not just two). Destroying any of them before doca_ctx_destroy is a use-after-free that surfaces as DOCA_ERROR_BAD_STATE from subsequent calls.

Layer 6 (program) — EC overlay.

  • Block-sizing matrix: the most common EC program-layer bug is a per-buffer length that doesn't match the configured block size — surfaces as DOCA_ERROR_INVALID_VALUE at submit. Confirm every source AND destination buffer length equals the configured block size, and that the block size itself is ≤ doca_ec_cap_get_max_block_size(devinfo). The matching N + K error is N + K > doca_ec_cap_get_max_buf_list_len(devinfo, &max_buf_list_len) at configure / submit; the fix there is to shrink the layout or pick a device with a higher cap.
  • Matrix-type drift: a _set_conf call that quotes a matrix variant doca_ec_matrix_create() fails to construct on the active device for returns DOCA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED. Re-enumerate the supported matrix types against the active doca_devinfo; do not assume from prior installs.
  • Task-type drift: an _allocate_init call that asks for a task type the cap query returns false for returns DOCA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED. Re-run the matching doca_ec_cap_task_*_is_supported against the active doca_devinfo; do not assume from prior installs.
  • Recover-out-of-budget: a recover task that lists more than K missing blocks returns DOCA_ERROR_INVALID_VALUE — the layout is unrecoverable. The fix is upstream (more redundancy at encode time, or replication on top of EC), not a tweak inside the EC call.
  • Update-vs-create mis-routing: a user re-encoding via doca_ec_task_create on every single-block change is not errored — it just wastes accelerator cycles. The "fix" is a workflow correction (route to doca_ec_task_update), not a DOCA_ERROR_* interpretation.
  • Recover smoke produces wrong bytes: the recovered block is the wrong length → block-size mismatch or N + K mismatch. The recovered block is the right length but content differs → wrong matrix type, or source / destination buffer swap, or the fixture used for the smoke is itself corrupt. Walk the matrix-type + N + K + buffer wiring before any other diagnosis.

Once the layer is identified, route to the matching debug verb on the matching skill: install / build / link / driver to doca-setup ## debug; version to doca-version ## debug; cross-cutting runtime to doca-debug ## debug; program-layer Core-context patterns to doca-programming-guide TASKS.md ## debug.

Deferred task verbs

The following verbs are out of scope for this skill but are commonly asked in the same conversations. Route them as follows so the agent does not invent guidance:

  • install. Installing DOCA, choosing packages, post-install verification, pkg-config wiring — defer to doca-setup and to the install-tree layout in doca-public-knowledge-map ## Layout of an installed DOCA package. This skill assumes DOCA is already installed.
  • deploy. Deploying EC-using applications at scale (storage daemons running create / recover / update on many nodes, rebuild workers, Kubernetes operator workflows) — out of scope for Phase 1 and reserved for a future platform skill. For single-host first-run testing, the right verb in this skill is ## run; do not invent a "deploy" workflow.
  • rollback. Coordinated rollback of EC-using applications across many hosts — out of scope. For a single in-session EC configuration rollback, the right verb in this skill is destroying the context (doca_ctx_stop → doca_ctx_destroy) and re-running ## configure with corrected parameters.
  • storage-stack design. How to layer replication on top of EC, how to schedule rebuilds, how to choose N + K per durability target across many nodes, how to rebalance after node failure — outside this skill. EC is one primitive inside the user's storage stack; the stack design lives upstream of this skill.
  • kernel-level driver install / firmware burn. EC depends on the underlying ConnectX firmware and BlueField BFB; if the debug ladder lands on a driver-layer issue (DOCA_ERROR_DRIVER from an EC submit, repeated accelerator errors in dmesg), the fix is via mlxconfig / mlxfwreset / re-imaging the BFB, all of which belong to doca-setup ## debug layer 5.

Command appendix

Every command below is cross-cutting on DOCA Erasure Coding — it answers a recurring class of question that comes up in the verbs above. The agent should treat the class as load-bearing; the worked example is a single instance. Run-as user is the unprivileged user unless noted. Sudo is called out per row.

Infra-aware preamble (every row below). Per the bundle's detect → prefer → fall back → report contract documented in doca-structured-tools-contract ## The agent behavior contract, the agent should:

  1. Probe for the matching structured helper FIRST (doca-env --json for version + devices + libraries + drivers + hugepages in one shot; doca-capability-snapshot for per-device capability flags; version-matrix.json for "available since" lookups).
  2. If the probe succeeds, the structured tool's output is the authoritative answer and the agent SHOULD NOT also run the manual command in the row below. Report "using structured <tool>".
  3. If the probe fails, fall back to the manual command in the row. Report "falling back to manual chain".
  4. The schemas the structured tools emit are defined in doca-structured-tools-contract ## Schemas; the version-handling semantics (four-way match, NGC, headers-win) are owned by doca-version.
Command (worked example) Owning step Class of question it answers What healthy output looks like
pkg-config --modversion doca-erasure-coding ## configure step 1; ## build slot 4 What is the build-time DOCA EC version? A semver string matching doca_caps --version. Disagreement = partial install (route to doca-version TASKS.md ## debug layer 2)
pkg-config --cflags --libs doca-erasure-coding ## build What include + link flags does the linker need? Trust whatever pkg-config --cflags --libs produces on this install. Do not hardcode either the -I include path or the -l<name> flag form — both can drift between DOCA install profiles and DOCA majors; the on-disk .so basenames use underscores on every release where we have ground truth, while the .pc package names use hyphens, and pkg-config is the only thing that resolves both correctly. Hand-crafted -l lines silently break when DOCA upgrades.
doca_caps --list-devs ## configure step 2; ## run step 1 Which devices on this host can be used as a doca_dev for EC? One row per visible device with PCIe address and capability flags; the agent must still run doca_ec_cap_* per-device to confirm per-task and matrix-type support
doca_caps --version ## configure step 1; ## test step 1 What is the runtime DOCA version on this host? A semver string matching pkg-config --modversion doca-erasure-coding
ls /opt/mellanox/doca/samples/doca_erasure_coding/ ## modify slot 1 Which EC samples ship in this install, and which is the closest starting point? A list of sample directories named after the task direction they demonstrate (create / recover / update)
cat /opt/mellanox/doca/applications/VERSION ## configure step 1; ## debug layer 1 What does the install tree itself claim its version is? A semver string matching the other two version sources
`dmesg tail -n 40` (sudo) ## debug layer 7 What did the kernel / driver log around the last EC call?
DOCA_LOG_LEVEL=trace ./<binary> ## run step 3 What did the structured DOCA logger emit for the first failing call? A trace-level line on every lifecycle transition and every task submission. Silence after submission = PE not progressed

For commands shared across libraries (pkg-config --modversion, doca_caps, cat /opt/mellanox/doca/applications/VERSION, DOCA_LOG_LEVEL) the cross-library overlay is in doca-debug TASKS.md ## Command appendix; this table adds the EC-specific rows on top.

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

No alerts2mo3 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub2mo

    The skill provides technical documentation and workflows for developers working with the NVIDIA DOCA Erasure Coding library. It contains no executable code, avoids remote downloads, and includes explicit safety guidance for hardware-level buffer management.

  • Socket2mo

    No alerts

  • Snyk2mo

    Risk: LOW · No issues

Signed by skilld at f64fa0e. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub yesterday.

Activeupdated 3 months ago
metadata
{
  "kind": "library"
}
Other metadata
compatibility
Requires DOCA SDK installed at /opt/mellanox/doca on Linux (Ubuntu 22.04/24.04 or RHEL/SLES) with a BlueField DPU or ConnectX NIC attached. Reads the user's local install via `pkg-config doca-erasure-coding` and inspects /opt/mellanox/doca/{lib,include,samples,applications}.

README badge

README badge for nvidia/skills/doca-erasure-coding