All skills
nvidia avatar

/holohub-debug-build-run

@0bab109
by NVIDIA Corporationnvidia/skills3.5k stars
424

Use when a concrete ./holohub command fails, hangs, regresses, or returns wrong output and needs reproducible diagnosis and verification.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/nvidia/skills/holohub-debug-build-run

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

BENCHMARK.md

≈1.2k tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Skill Benchmark: holohub-debug-build-run

✅ Overall verdict: PASS — Recommended for publication

Publication Recommendation

Recommended for publication based on the completed evaluation evidence in this report.

Evaluation Metadata

  • Skill: holohub-debug-build-run
  • Evaluation date: 2026-09-02
  • Evaluator version: 1.3.2
  • Agents: Claude Code (aws/anthropic/bedrock-claude-opus-4-8), Codex (openai/openai/gpt-5.5)
  • Tasks: 4 evaluation tasks (2 positive, 2 negative)
  • Dataset digest: sha256:41d9c7ad53e3ffbb2231adcaff6441d7314f0715a74ffe28f85384e35d705116 (skill-evaluator-dataset-snapshot/1)
  • Attempts per task: 1
  • Environment: k8s-sandbox
  • Tier 3 evidence: required for publication

Each task attempt ran in its own isolated sandbox pod.

Execution and Provenance

  • Validation status: passed
  • Report generation: complete
  • Evaluator version: 1.3.2
  • Git commit: 5cef2df2964d9ec786c93c06503f4a4fbdc2c555
  • Content type: requested auto, detected skill
  • Container image: gitlab-master.nvidia.com:5005/nvcarps/ci-group/nvcarps-ci/skillevaluator-ci:sha-5cef2df2964d9ec786c93c06503f4a4fbdc2c555
  • Container image digest: not recorded
  • Tier 3: requested true, executed true, status succeeded

What This Report Answers

The three-tier evaluation checks whether the skill:

  • is safe to use;
  • produces correct answers;
  • is discovered and activated when needed;
  • helps the agent complete the user's goal and expected workflow; and
  • avoids wasted skill and tool usage.

Results at a Glance

Measure Claude Code (Baseline → Skill Uplift) Codex (Baseline → Skill Uplift)
Overall 64% → 89% (+25 points) 60% → 69% (+9 points)
Security 100% → 100% (±0 points) 75% → 100% (+25 points)
Correctness 45% → 85% (+40 points) 60% → 60% (±0 points)
Discoverability 61% → 100% (+39 points) 56% → 70% (+14 points)
Effectiveness 55% → 60% (+6 points) 48% → 40% (-9 points)
Efficiency 58% → 99% (+41 points) 58% → 75% (+17 points)

How to read this table: baseline is the same task attempted without the target skill. Uplift is skill score - baseline score, shown in percentage points.

Example: 47% → 92% (+45 points) means the skill-assisted run scored 92%, 45 percentage points above its 47% no-skill baseline.

Tier Status

Tier Purpose Status Evidence
Tier 1 Static validation PASSED 1 validator(s); 0 finding(s)
Tier 2 Semantic deduplication NOT RUN No result was recorded
Tier 3 Live agent evaluation PASS 2 agent(s); 4 task(s)

Findings and Observations

<details> <summary>Show detailed findings and successful checks</summary>
  • Schema & Repository Governance: Found skill manifest: SKILL.md
  • AGENT_EVAL: Tier 3 evaluation complete: verdict PASS; best agent claude-code
</details>

Scoring Methodology

<details> <summary>Show dimension definitions, source signals, and thresholds</summary>
Dimension Question Scored signals
Security Is it safe to use? security (100%)
Correctness Is the answer correct? accuracy (100%)
Discoverability Was the right skill loaded when needed? skill_execution (100%)
Effectiveness Did the skill help complete the task? goal_accuracy (50%) + behavior_check (50%)
Efficiency Did it avoid wasted tool or skill usage? skill_efficiency (100%)
  • Dimension bands: PASS at 50% or above; NEUTRAL from 40% to below 50%; FAIL below 40%.
  • Overall Tier 3 lift: PASS at +5 points or more; FAIL at -10 points or less; values between those bands are NEUTRAL.
  • Overall verdict: PASS only when every configured dimension passes for at least one supported agent. Lift is reported as diagnostic evidence and does not override this gate.
  • The 50% attempt pass threshold is a separate per-task gate; it is not the dimension pass threshold.
  • Effectiveness is the equal-weight mean of goal completion (goal_accuracy) and expected workflow adherence (behavior_check).
  • Token efficiency is a separate report-only signal. It does not change a dimension score or the overall verdict.

Signals present in this run:

  • security (Security): unsafe operations, secret leakage, and unauthorized access.
  • skill_execution (Skill Execution): whether the expected skill was found and executed.
  • skill_efficiency (Efficiency): routing quality, workspace-aware skill reads, and productive tool use.
  • accuracy (Accuracy): final-answer correctness against the reference answer.
  • goal_accuracy (Goal Accuracy): whether the user's goal was achieved.
  • behavior_check (Behavior Check): whether the expected workflow behavior was followed.
</details>

Freshness

Regenerate this benchmark when the skill, evaluation dataset, target agent/model, evaluator version, environment, or scoring policy changes.

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

No alerts28d3 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub28d

    The skill provides structured instructions for debugging HoloHub command failures, emphasizing safe practices such as dry-runs, authorization for destructive actions, and least-privilege principles.

  • Socket28d

    No alerts

  • Snyk28d

    Risk: LOW · No issues

Signed by skilld at 0bab109. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub yesterday.

Activeupdated 2 months ago
Other metadata
metadata
{
  "author": "Holoscan Team <holoscan-team@nvidia.com>",
  "compatibility": "holoscan-cli>=4.5.0",
  "github-url": "https://github.com/nvidia-holoscan/holohub",
  "tags": [
    "holoscan",
    "holohub",
    "debugging"
  ]
}

README badge

README badge for nvidia/skills/holohub-debug-build-run