Skill Benchmark: i4h-workflow-setup
✅ Overall verdict: PASS — Recommended for publication
Publication Recommendation
Recommended for publication based on the completed evaluation evidence in this report.
Evaluation Metadata
- Skill:
i4h-workflow-setup - Evaluation date: 2026-09-15
- Evaluator version:
1.5.6 - Agents: Claude Code (
aws/anthropic/bedrock-claude-opus-4-8), Codex (openai/openai/gpt-5.5) - Tasks: 1 evaluation tasks (1 positive)
- Dataset digest:
sha256:ade31484d3ac5633cdb8008746e2b20803e31832a7c5b577d8bff9bb02a55354(skill-evaluator-dataset-snapshot/1) - Attempts per task: 3
- Environment:
k8s-sandbox - Tier 2 evidence: required for publication
- Tier 3 evidence: required for publication
Each task attempt ran in its own isolated sandbox pod.
What This Report Answers
The three-tier evaluation checks whether the skill:
- is safe to use;
- produces correct answers;
- is discovered and activated when needed;
- helps the agent complete the user's goal and expected workflow; and
- avoids wasted skill and tool usage.
Results at a Glance
| Measure | Claude Code (Baseline → Skill Uplift) | Codex (Baseline → Skill Uplift) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 88.8% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable | 65.7% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable |
| Security | 100.0% → 100.0% (±0.0 points) | 0.0% → 0.0% (±0.0 points) |
| Correctness | 80.0% → 100.0% (+20.0 points) | 100.0% → 100.0% (±0.0 points) |
| Discoverability | 95.0% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable | 75.0% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable |
| Effectiveness | 39.3% → 71.1% (+31.8 points) | 85.7% → 95.0% (+9.3 points) |
| Efficiency | 77.9% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable | 58.7% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable |
How to read this table: baseline is the same task attempted without the target skill. Scores are rounded to one decimal; threshold-adjacent values use additional precision so their displayed band matches the verdict. Uplift is derived from those displayed scores and shown in percentage points.
Example: 47.0% → 92.0% (+45.0 points) means the skill-assisted run scored 92.0%, 45.0 percentage points above its 47.0% no-skill baseline.
Token Usage
Actual Tier 3 execution usage is reported for every observed agent/case pair and both conditions.
| Agent | Dataset case | With skill | Without skill | Delta | Change | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| claude-code | All cases | 303,304 | 398,810 | -95,506 | -23.95% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| claude-code | i4h-workflow-setup-readme-quick-setup | 303,304 | 398,810 | -95,506 | -23.95% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | All cases | 823,880 | 1,369,599 | -545,719 | -39.85% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | i4h-workflow-setup-readme-quick-setup | 823,880 | 1,369,599 | -545,719 | -39.85% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| ALL AGENTS | Dataset aggregate | 1,127,184 | 1,768,409 | -641,225 | -36.26% | skill 2/2; base 2/2 |
Prompt tokens include cached reads, so total tokens are prompt + completion (cached is not added twice). The Efficiency score uses (prompt - cached) + completion. N/A means the relevant trajectory counters were not available; coverage is never estimated.
Tier Status
| Tier | Purpose | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Static validation | PASSED | 11 validator(s); 0 finding(s) |
| Tier 2 | Semantic deduplication | PASSED | 2 validator(s); 0 finding(s) |
| Tier 3 | Live agent evaluation | PASS | 2 agent(s); 1 task(s) |
Findings and Observations
<details> <summary>Show detailed findings and successful checks</summary>- Schema & Repository Governance: Found skill manifest: SKILL.md
- Semantic Version Validation: Valid semantic version: 0.8.0
- Security Scan: No security vulnerabilities detected (secrets, API keys, credentials)
- PII Scan: Scanning 1 files for PII
- Code Integrity & Hygiene: Checking 1 markdown files for dead links
- Unicode Smuggling Detection: No invisible Unicode characters detected in 1 file(s)
- QUALITY: Score: 100.0/100 (Grade: A)
- SCRIPT_LINT: No scripts/ directory found
- Context Deduplication: Collected 1 file(s)
- Inter-Skill Deduplication: Parsed skill 'i4h-workflow-setup': 167 char description
- AGENT_EVAL: Tier 3 evaluation complete: verdict PASS; best agent claude-code
Scoring Methodology
<details> <summary>Show dimension definitions, source signals, and thresholds</summary>| Dimension | Question | Scored signals |
|---|---|---|
| Security | Is it safe to use? | security (100%) |
| Correctness | Is the answer correct? | accuracy (100%) |
| Discoverability | Was the right skill loaded when needed? | skill_execution (100%) |
| Effectiveness | Did the skill help complete the task? | goal_accuracy (50%) + behavior_check (50%) |
| Efficiency | Did it avoid wasted tool calls and token usage? | skill_efficiency (50%) + token_efficiency (50%) |
- Dimension bands: PASS at 50% or above; NEUTRAL from 40% to below 50%; FAIL below 40%.
- Overall Tier 3 lift: PASS at +5 points or more; FAIL at -10 points or less; values between those bands are NEUTRAL.
- Overall verdict: PASS only when every configured dimension passes for at least one supported agent. Lift is reported as diagnostic evidence and does not override this gate.
- The 50% attempt pass threshold is a separate per-task gate; it is not the dimension pass threshold.
- Effectiveness is the equal-weight mean of goal completion (
goal_accuracy) and expected workflow adherence (behavior_check). - Efficiency is 50% tool-call productivity (the backward-compatible
skill_efficiencywire id) and 50%token_efficiency. Positive-case skill routing is scored under Discoverability, not Efficiency; a negative case without a routing target is N/A. N/A sources are omitted, remaining weights are renormalized, and the dimension is marked partial.
Signals present in this run:
security(Security): unsafe operations, secret leakage, and unauthorized access.skill_execution(Skill Execution): whether the expected skill was selected, decoys were avoided, and the workflow executed.skill_efficiency(Tool Productivity): tool-call productivity (legacy wire id; routing is scored under Discoverability).accuracy(Accuracy): final-answer correctness against the reference answer.goal_accuracy(Goal Accuracy): whether the user's goal was achieved.behavior_check(Behavior Check): whether the expected workflow behavior was followed.token_efficiency(Token Efficiency): actual uncached prompt plus completion usage (50% of Efficiency).
Freshness
Regenerate this benchmark when the skill, evaluation dataset, target agent/model, evaluator version, environment, or scoring policy changes.