All skills
nvidia avatar

/i4h-workflow-validate

@eb93678
by NVIDIA Corporationnvidia/skills3.5k stars
424

Run the root-level workflow runtime policy or rule-based rollouts and verify simulator success. Use for evaluation, checkpoints, or local controllers; do not use for replay or dataset annotation.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/nvidia/skills/i4h-workflow-validate

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

BENCHMARK.md

≈1.2k tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Skill Benchmark: i4h-workflow-validate

✅ Overall verdict: PASS — Recommended for publication

Publication Recommendation

Recommended for publication based on the completed evaluation evidence in this report.

Evaluation Metadata

  • Skill: i4h-workflow-validate
  • Evaluation date: 2026-10-01
  • Evaluator version: 1.5.6
  • Agents: Claude Code (aws/anthropic/bedrock-claude-opus-4-8), Codex (openai/openai/gpt-5.5)
  • Tasks: 20 evaluation tasks (20 positive)
  • Dataset digest: sha256:7edc28d803fd2c43a71c294c0692be370df7cb366c30d019a04cae5ee0ff15d2 (skill-evaluator-dataset-snapshot/1)
  • Attempts per task: 1
  • Environment: k8s-sandbox
  • Tier 2 evidence: required for publication
  • Tier 3 evidence: required for publication

Each task attempt ran in its own isolated sandbox pod.

What This Report Answers

The three-tier evaluation checks whether the skill:

  • is safe to use;
  • produces correct answers;
  • is discovered and activated when needed;
  • helps the agent complete the user's goal and expected workflow; and
  • avoids wasted skill and tool usage.

Results at a Glance

Measure Claude Code (Baseline → Skill Uplift) Codex (Baseline → Skill Uplift)
Overall 73.0% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable 58.3% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable
Security 90.0% → 80.0% (-10.0 points) 25.0% → 22.5% (-2.5 points)
Correctness 4.0% → 88.0% (+84.0 points) 63.0% → 91.0% (+28.0 points)
Discoverability 94.8% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable 80.0% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable
Effectiveness 2.7% → 26.2% (+23.5 points) 24.4% → 42.8% (+18.4 points)
Efficiency 75.9% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable 55.1% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable

How to read this table: baseline is the same task attempted without the target skill. Scores are rounded to one decimal; threshold-adjacent values use additional precision so their displayed band matches the verdict. Uplift is derived from those displayed scores and shown in percentage points.

Example: 47.0% → 92.0% (+45.0 points) means the skill-assisted run scored 92.0%, 45.0 percentage points above its 47.0% no-skill baseline.

A partial dimension was calculated from only the available configured signals; review the detailed report before relying on it.

Token Usage

Actual Tier 3 execution usage is reported for every observed agent/case pair and both conditions.

Agent Dataset case With skill Without skill Delta Change Coverage
claude-code All cases 11,228,344 6,977,680 N/A N/A skill 6/20; base 6/20
claude-code i4h-workflow-validate-readme-new-env-rule-based-record 318,822 321,012 -2,190 -0.68% skill 1/1; base 1/1
claude-code i4h-workflow-validate-readme-quick-locomanip-cart N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
claude-code i4h-workflow-validate-readme-quick-locomanip-tray N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
claude-code i4h-workflow-validate-readme-quick-new-checkpoint N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
claude-code i4h-workflow-validate-readme-quick-scissor-two 4,522,475 N/A N/A N/A skill 1/1; base 0/1
claude-code i4h-workflow-validate-readme-quick-surgical-lift-needle-rule-based N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
claude-code i4h-workflow-validate-readme-quick-surgical-reach-newton N/A 3,260,419 N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 1/1
claude-code i4h-workflow-validate-readme-quick-surgical-reach-rule-based N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
claude-code i4h-workflow-validate-readme-quick-trocar N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
claude-code i4h-workflow-validate-readme-quick-ultrasound N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
claude-code i4h-workflow-validate-readme-robotic-instrument-reach 207,894 447,313 -239,419 -53.52% skill 1/1; base 1/1
claude-code i4h-workflow-validate-specialty-endoluminal-demo N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
claude-code i4h-workflow-validate-specialty-endoluminal-total-segmentator N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
claude-code i4h-workflow-validate-specialty-scissor-policy N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
claude-code i4h-workflow-validate-specialty-surgical-dual-psm N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
claude-code i4h-workflow-validate-specialty-surgical-lift-block 5,555,783 N/A N/A N/A skill 1/1; base 0/1
claude-code i4h-workflow-validate-specialty-surgical-lift-needle-organs N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
claude-code i4h-workflow-validate-specialty-surgical-star N/A 1,973,749 N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 1/1
claude-code i4h-workflow-validate-table-scissor-three 375,917 280,652 +95,265 +33.94% skill 1/1; base 1/1
claude-code i4h-workflow-validate-ultrasound-probe-reach 247,453 694,535 -447,082 -64.37% skill 1/1; base 1/1
codex All cases 31,730,638 41,836,769 N/A N/A skill 6/20; base 6/20
codex i4h-workflow-validate-readme-new-env-rule-based-record 440,339 3,329,185 -2,888,846 -86.77% skill 1/1; base 1/1
codex i4h-workflow-validate-readme-quick-locomanip-cart N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
codex i4h-workflow-validate-readme-quick-locomanip-tray N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
codex i4h-workflow-validate-readme-quick-new-checkpoint N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
codex i4h-workflow-validate-readme-quick-scissor-two 14,773,729 N/A N/A N/A skill 1/1; base 0/1
codex i4h-workflow-validate-readme-quick-surgical-lift-needle-rule-based N/A 15,747,712 N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 1/1
codex i4h-workflow-validate-readme-quick-surgical-reach-newton N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
codex i4h-workflow-validate-readme-quick-surgical-reach-rule-based N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
codex i4h-workflow-validate-readme-quick-trocar N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
codex i4h-workflow-validate-readme-quick-ultrasound N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
codex i4h-workflow-validate-readme-robotic-instrument-reach 410,174 590,738 -180,564 -30.57% skill 1/1; base 1/1
codex i4h-workflow-validate-specialty-endoluminal-demo N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
codex i4h-workflow-validate-specialty-endoluminal-total-segmentator 13,249,921 N/A N/A N/A skill 1/1; base 0/1
codex i4h-workflow-validate-specialty-scissor-policy N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
codex i4h-workflow-validate-specialty-surgical-dual-psm N/A 17,174,793 N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 1/1
codex i4h-workflow-validate-specialty-surgical-lift-block N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
codex i4h-workflow-validate-specialty-surgical-lift-needle-organs N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
codex i4h-workflow-validate-specialty-surgical-star N/A N/A N/A N/A skill 0/1; base 0/1
codex i4h-workflow-validate-table-scissor-three 2,067,679 3,561,756 -1,494,077 -41.95% skill 1/1; base 1/1
codex i4h-workflow-validate-ultrasound-probe-reach 788,796 1,432,585 -643,789 -44.94% skill 1/1; base 1/1
ALL AGENTS Dataset aggregate 42,958,982 48,814,449 N/A N/A skill 12/40; base 12/40

Prompt tokens include cached reads, so total tokens are prompt + completion (cached is not added twice). The Efficiency score uses (prompt - cached) + completion. N/A means the relevant trajectory counters were not available; coverage is never estimated.

Tier Status

Tier Purpose Status Evidence
Tier 1 Static validation PASSED WITH OBSERVATIONS 11 validator(s); 3 finding(s)
Tier 2 Semantic deduplication PASSED 2 validator(s); 0 finding(s)
Tier 3 Live agent evaluation PASS 2 agent(s); 20 task(s)

Findings and Observations

<details> <summary>Show detailed findings and successful checks</summary>
  • LOW QUALITY/quality_reliability: Inputs are used but no dedicated Inputs section is documented (team-skills/holoscan/i4h-workflows/i4h-workflow-validate/SKILL.md)
  • LOW QUALITY/quality_reliability: Structured output is used but no dedicated Output Format section is documented (team-skills/holoscan/i4h-workflows/i4h-workflow-validate/SKILL.md)
  • LOW SECURITY/Unknown (SQP-2): The skill silently clones a remote repository into the user's home directory ($HOME/$I4H_REPO_DIR_NAME) without explicit (SKILL.md:40)
</details>

Scoring Methodology

<details> <summary>Show dimension definitions, source signals, and thresholds</summary>
Dimension Question Scored signals
Security Is it safe to use? security (100%)
Correctness Is the answer correct? accuracy (100%)
Discoverability Was the right skill loaded when needed? skill_execution (100%)
Effectiveness Did the skill help complete the task? goal_accuracy (50%) + behavior_check (50%)
Efficiency Did it avoid wasted tool calls and token usage? skill_efficiency (50%) + token_efficiency (50%)
  • Dimension bands: PASS at 50% or above; NEUTRAL from 40% to below 50%; FAIL below 40%.
  • Overall Tier 3 lift: PASS at +5 points or more; FAIL at -10 points or less; values between those bands are NEUTRAL.
  • Overall verdict: PASS only when every configured dimension passes for at least one supported agent. Lift is reported as diagnostic evidence and does not override this gate.
  • The 50% attempt pass threshold is a separate per-task gate; it is not the dimension pass threshold.
  • Effectiveness is the equal-weight mean of goal completion (goal_accuracy) and expected workflow adherence (behavior_check).
  • Efficiency is 50% tool-call productivity (the backward-compatible skill_efficiency wire id) and 50% token_efficiency. Positive-case skill routing is scored under Discoverability, not Efficiency; a negative case without a routing target is N/A. N/A sources are omitted, remaining weights are renormalized, and the dimension is marked partial.

Signals present in this run:

  • security (Security): unsafe operations, secret leakage, and unauthorized access.
  • skill_execution (Skill Execution): whether the expected skill was selected, decoys were avoided, and the workflow executed.
  • skill_efficiency (Tool Productivity): tool-call productivity (legacy wire id; routing is scored under Discoverability).
  • accuracy (Accuracy): final-answer correctness against the reference answer.
  • goal_accuracy (Goal Accuracy): whether the user's goal was achieved.
  • behavior_check (Behavior Check): whether the expected workflow behavior was followed.
</details>

Freshness

Regenerate this benchmark when the skill, evaluation dataset, target agent/model, evaluator version, environment, or scoring policy changes.

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

No alerts26d3 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub26d

    This skill is a validation workflow for Isaac for Healthcare (i4h) and is safe to use. It facilitates running policy evaluations and state-machine smoke tests within a controlled simulation environment. All external code and tools reference official NVIDIA repositories and legitimate project dependencies.

  • Socket26d

    No alerts

  • Snyk26d

    Risk: LOW · No issues

Signed by skilld at eb93678. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub yesterday.

Activeupdated 4 weeks ago
Other metadata
metadata
{
  "author": "Isaac for Healthcare Team <isaac-for-healthcare-support@nvidia.com>",
  "version": "0.8.0",
  "tags": [
    "isaac-for-healthcare",
    "i4h",
    "simulation",
    "evaluation"
  ]
}

README badge

README badge for nvidia/skills/i4h-workflow-validate