Procedure — jetson-customize-pcie
Companion reference for SKILL.md. Follow steps in order. Cross-skill
context lives in bsp-customization-workflow.md and
bsp-customization-kernel-dtb.md under context/.
Step 1 — Resolve active target + open source-of-truth documents
Same as jetson-customize-uphy Step 1 + jetson-customize-mgbe Step 1 (refuse
table + identifier resolution + document resolution). Additionally
resolve:
| Var | Source |
|---|---|
<carrier-pinmap> |
<workspace>/target-platform/<profile-stem>.jetson-customize-pinmux/pinmap/<custom-carrier>.json (produced by jetson-customize-pinmux probe) |
<devkit-pinmap> |
Optional — <workspace>/target-platform/<profile-stem>.jetson-customize-pinmux/pinmap/<reference_devkit-name>.json if a separate devkit pinmap was probed |
<ref-dtb> |
<bsp_image.root_path>/Linux_for_Tegra/kernel/dtb/tegra<soc>-<reference_devkit-carrier>-<reference_devkit-module>-nv.dtb |
<uphy-state> |
<workspace>/target-platform/<profile-stem>.jetson-customize-uphy.json — drives the enable decision in Step 5 |
Refuse if <uphy-state> is missing — run /jetson-customize-uphy first.
Step 2 — Diff PCIe topology — devkit vs custom carrier
Decompile the reference DTB and enumerate every PCIe controller:
dtc -I dtb -O dts <ref-dtb> > /tmp/k.dtsUse the NVIDIA Tegra controller nodes, NOT the ECAM root nodes. The
kernel DTB contains two unrelated families of pcie@<addr> nodes:
| Compatible | Role | Use for this skill? |
|---|---|---|
nvidia,tegra264-pcie (Thor) / nvidia,tegra234-pcie (Orin) |
NVIDIA Tegra PCIe controller (one per CID) — bears the real status this skill flips |
yes |
pci-host-ecam-generic |
Post-enumeration PCI bus root (one per linux,pci-domain) — status here reflects bus presence, NOT controller enable state, and is typically disabled for all non-default domains |
no — ignore |
Filter by compatible, not by node name:
grep -nE 'compatible.*nvidia,tegra[0-9]+-pcie\b' /tmp/k.dtsThen for each matched pcie@<addr> block (the NVIDIA controller, NOT the
ECAM root) extract: address, linux,pci-domain (→ controller C<N>
mapping), stock status, num-lanes, max-link-speed.
When extracting a node body, bound the awk/sed range by matching the
closing brace at the same indent as the opening line — a naive
/pcie@<addr> \{/,/^\t};/ range will leak past sub-nodes and report the
wrong status from a nested child.
Build the diff table:
| Controller | Addr | Devkit wiring | Custom carrier wiring | Stock status | Schematic page |
|---|
Wiring sources:
- Devkit —
<devkit-pinmap>(if present) + Adaptation Guide §"PCIe" for the reference devkit; cross-checklinux,pci-domainin the DTB. - Custom carrier —
<carrier-pinmap>forPEX<N>_LN_*,PEX<N>_CLKREQ_*,PEX<N>_RST_*+ grep the schematic forPCIe x<N>/PEX_<controller>_*net labels and the receptacle they land on (M.2 M/E, x16 slot, on-board NIC).
Mark controllers whose carrier wiring differs from devkit ("changed"). Surface the table to the user (with schematic page numbers cited) before posing any question.
Step 3 — Ask which controller(s) to customize
AskUserQuestion with multiSelect: true, options built from Step 2:
- Changed controllers first, marked
(changed: <one-line delta>). - Unchanged controllers next, marked
(stock). - All controllers — shortcut option.
Never offer a controller the in-tree DTB does not expose.
Step 4 — Per-controller verification: pinmap + schematic + pin-verifier
For each selected controller, run a per-controller sub-loop.
4a. Cross-check carrier pinmap + schematic. Required ancillary pins per controller:
| Signal | SFIO | Direction | Initial state | Optional? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PE<N>_CLKREQ_L |
pe<N>_clkreq_l |
input | n/a | no |
PE<N>_RST_L |
pe<N>_rst_l |
output | high | no |
PE<N>_WAKE_L |
pe<N>_wake_l |
input | n/a | yes (when wired) |
For each pin: resolve via <carrier-pinmap> to CVM ball + net label,
verify the net actually lands on the receptacle in the schematic,
verify the cloned pinmux DTSI in the overlay tracker has the pin at
the right SFIO. An unrouted pin → record in notes[] and surface
before asking customization questions so the user can drop the
controller.
4b. Auto-invoke pin_verifier.py for SFIO mismatches (same
contract as jetson-customize-mgbe Step 4; kb_dir=<workspace>/target-platform/<profile-stem>.jetson-customize-pcie, io_label="pcie", expected list from 4a). For each mismatch, surface
"I'm setting pin <X> to SFIO <Y> for <reason>" and route to
/jetson-customize-pinmux set-pin. Verifier is read-only; the
session.json shim under --kb-dir is regenerated each run.
Step 5 — Auto-derive per-controller plan, then confirm-or-customize
5a. Auto-derive the per-controller plan. For each controller in the user's selection from Step 3:
enable— derive from<uphy-state>'suphy.config+uphy.config_uphy1against the Adaptation Guide §"Configure the UPHY Lane" table:- UPHY allocates lanes → mandatorily enabled (
status=okayon both surfaces). Offering "keep disabled" would create an inconsistent ODMDATA-vs-overlay state — forbidden. - UPHY does NOT allocate → mandatorily disabled (
status=disabledon both surfaces). Enabling would point the kernel at a powered- down PHY → link timeouts. Surface the UPHY-driven decision in the question preamble for auditability.
- UPHY allocates lanes → mandatorily enabled (
lanes— from the UPHY config's lane-width entry for this controller (the table in the Adaptation Guide §"Configure the UPHY Lane" lists per-config controller widths).speed— from Adaptation Guide §PCIe per-controller max (Gen5 on Thor RC ports; Gen4 on Orin Tegra234 RC ports).mode— hard-pinned to"rc", never asked. Every emittedcontrollers[*].modeis"rc", every ODMDATA token ispcie@<N>_pcie-mode=1, every overlay fragment targets the RC sub- node. EP only via explicitmode_override="ep"in Step 5c fallthrough.
5b. Confirm-or-customize gate (mandatory). Render a per-controller table:
| Controller | Enable | Lanes | Speed | Mode | Derivation |
|---|
Then issue ONE AskUserQuestion:
Question: "PCIe plan derived from <uphy-state> + Adaptation Guide.
Proceed as-is or customize?"
Header: "PCIe plan"
Options:
- "Proceed with auto-derived plan (Recommended)" → skip 5c, go to Step 6
- "Override lanes / speed for one or more controllers" → 5c
- "Mark a controller for EP-mode override" → 5c (mode_override branch)Default is one click. Do NOT skip this gate even when every value
is determinable — silent commit of a non-trivial customization is a
known failure mode (consistent with jetson-customize-uphy's explicit
choice point).
5c. Per-controller customization (fallthrough only). One batched
AskUserQuestion per controller, sub-questions for lanes / speed /
mode_override as needed. If schematic suggests x4 but Adaptation
Guide caps at x2 for this controller, surface in guidance; let
the user decide.
Step 6 — (no ODMDATA edits)
All PCIe-related ODMDATA tokens (pcie@N_status=*,
pcie@N_max-link-speed, pcie@N_pcie-mode, pcie@N_clk-scheme,
pcie-cN-endpoint-enable) are emitted by /jetson-customize-uphy
in its single atomic ODMDATA commit. This skill MUST NOT touch
ODMDATA=. Step 8 cross-checks consistency; on disagreement, stop
and ask the operator.
Step 7 — Append fragments to the composite custom overlay
This skill writes per-controller fragments into the single composite
custom overlay .dts for the active target. Filename / location /
skeleton / append protocol are documented in
bsp-customization-kernel-dtb.md — follow that doc exactly. The notes
below cover only what's PCIe-specific.
Marker for this skill's fragments: /* custom-bsp: pcie:pcie@<addr> */
(one fragment per controller in the delta; sub-key is the kernel-DT
node address). On re-run, delete every fragment matching this skill's
marker pattern before appending the new ones (context doc Step 5 of
the append protocol).
Fragment body — one per controller in the delta:
fragment@<N> { /* custom-bsp: pcie:pcie@a8b0000000 */
target-path = "/bus@0/pcie@a8b0000000"; /* C1 — addr from in-tree DTB, not TRM */
__overlay__ {
status = "okay";
num-lanes = <1>;
max-link-speed = <4>; /* Gen4 */
};
};
fragment@<N+1> { /* custom-bsp: pcie:pcie@b8b0000000 */
target-path = "/bus@0/pcie@b8b0000000"; /* C3 — disabled, no UPHY allocation */
__overlay__ {
status = "disabled";
};
};Node addresses come from dtc -I dtb -O dts <ref-dtb>, NOT the
SoC TRM. TRM lists register bases; kernel DT may use a different
reg layout (RP windows vs ECAM).
Skip a fragment entirely if every property already matches stock.
No-op overlays are noise. Always emit the fragment when status,
num-lanes, or max-link-speed differs from stock.
For mode_override == "ep": target the endpoint sub-node
(/bus@0/pcie_ep@<addr> from the reference DTB), set
compatible = "nvidia,tegra<soc>-pcie-ep" inside __overlay__
(not on the composite root), add nvidia,refclk-select-gpios when
the carrier sources refclk externally. Cite Adaptation Guide §"PCIe
Endpoint Mode" in the provenance comment.
Compatible string is set on the composite root, not per-fragment.
If it's missing the active-DUT string, fix the composite root, not
the fragment. The EP-mode compatible above is a kernel-DT property
on the endpoint node, not a UEFI plugin-manager gate.
Mandatory provenance comment as the first line inside
__overlay__ (audit trail): controller delta vs stock kernel-DT,
which uphyX-config-N justifies enable/disable, citation list
(Adaptation Guide §, schematic page, MDG table, DTB path).
Commit the composite .dts in the bsp_sources/ mono-repo
(filename resolved per the context doc):
git -C <source.root_path>/bsp_sources add <composite-relative-path>
git -C <source.root_path>/bsp_sources commit -m "jetson-customize-pcie: append pcie@<N> ... to <board-tag>-custom"Pre-flight sanity check (also documented in the context doc Step 10 of the append protocol):
cpp -nostdinc -x assembler-with-cpp <composite-abs-path> /tmp/composite.tmp.dts
dtc -@ -I dts -O dtb -o /tmp/composite.dtbo /tmp/composite.tmp.dts
fdtoverlay -i <bsp_image.root_path>/Linux_for_Tegra/kernel/dtb/<carrier-base>.dtb \
-o /tmp/merged.dtb /tmp/composite.dtboFail the commit if either step errors. /jetson-build-source
re-compiles the composite via nvidia-dtbs; this is a pre-flight
sanity check only.
Flash-conf and Makefile registration are NOT this skill's job —
jetson-build-source Step 5.0a owns both. Do not patch the carrier
flash conf here.
Step 8 — Cross-check ODMDATA vs overlay (dry-run guard)
Before declaring the run complete, verify per-controller consistency:
ODMDATA pcie@<N>_status= |
Overlay fragment | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
okay |
status="okay" |
ok |
okay |
absent | ok if stock kernel-DT already enables this controller |
okay |
status="disabled" |
abort — contradictory; flag and re-prompt Step 5 |
disabled |
status="disabled" |
ok |
disabled |
absent | ok if stock kernel-DT already disables |
disabled |
status="okay" |
abort — contradictory |
| absent | any | ok (skipped from this run) |
A contradictory row means the commit pair is inconsistent. Stop and
ask the user how to recover — surface the contradictory row, the
two offending commits (overlay tracker + bsp_sources), and let the
operator choose git revert, manual edit + amend, or re-running
Step 5 with corrected inputs. Never run git reset --hard
autonomously.
Step 9 — Run-state JSON sidecar + summary
Sidecar at
<workspace>/target-platform/<profile-stem>.jetson-customize-pcie.json:
{
"generator": "jetson-customize-pcie",
"generator_version": "0.1.0",
"generated_at": "<ISO-8601 UTC>",
"active_profile": "<profile-stem>.yaml",
"bsp_version": "<bsp_image.version>",
"topology_diff": [
{"id": "pcieN", "addr": "pcie@<addr>", "domain": N, "stock_status": "okay|disabled", "devkit_receptacle": "...", "carrier_receptacle": "...", "changed": true}
],
"controllers": [
{"id": "pcie4", "addr": "pcie@c0b0000000", "domain": 4, "enable": true, "lanes": 8, "mode": "rc", "speed": "gen5",
"uphy_derivation": "uphy1-config-0 allocates UPHY1 L0..L7 to pcie@C4 x8",
"ancillary_pins": {"clkreq": "pex_l4_clkreq_n_pp4", "rst": "pex_l4_rst_n_pp5", "wake": null}}
],
"compatible_list": ["nvidia,<carrier-id-sku>+<module-id-sku>", "nvidia,tegra<soc>"],
"odmdata_tokens": ["pcie@4_status=okay", "pcie@4_max-link-speed=5", "pcie@4_pcie-mode=1"],
"overlay": {
"composite_dts_path": "...tegra<soc>-<carrier-id-sku>+<module-id>-xxxx-custom.dts",
"fragments_appended": [{"marker": "pcie:pcie@c0b0000000", "delta": {"status": "okay", "num-lanes": 8, "max-link-speed": 5}}]
},
"pin_verifier_mismatches": [], "warnings": [], "notes": [], "sources": [],
"commit_shas": {"overlay_tracker": "<short SHA>", "bsp_sources": "<short SHA>"}
}Atomic write + idempotency: same as jetson-customize-uphy Step 5.
Headline + breakdown mirrors jetson-customize-uphy Step 8 — per-
controller delta, ODMDATA tokens, overlay path, commit SHAs,
mode_override flags, pin-verifier mismatches surfaced.
Next step (interactive prompt chain):
After the summary table is printed, drive the downstream chain via
sequential AskUserQuestion prompts. Each prompt needs an explicit
yes. On no (or any abort), print the remaining manual run-chain
and exit. Never substitute a printed "Next step: …" line for the
prompts.
If Step 4 surfaced SFIO mismatches, prepend prompt (0) first:
- Re-run /jetson-customize-pinmux to fix the surfaced SFIO
mismatches? — on
yesinvoke /jetson-customize-pinmux, then continue to (1).
Then in order:
- Customize any other I/O before build? — offer
/jetson-customize-pinmux, /jetson-customize-uphy,
/jetson-customize-mgbe, /jetson-customize-camera,
/jetson-customize-usb, /jetson-customize-clocks,
/jetson-customize-fan, /jetson-customize-nvpmodel,
/jetson-customize-memory, andno(proceed). On any non-nopick, invoke the chosen sub-skill inline; when it returns, re-ask this same question (loop) until the user picksno. Then continue to (2). - Build & promote? — on
yesinvoke /jetson-build-source, then on success invoke /jetson-promote-image. - Flash the board? — only offer if (2) ran and succeeded; on
yesinvoke /jetson-flash-image. - Validate on the DUT? — only offer if (3) ran and succeeded; on
yesinvoke /jetson-validate-image.