Evaluation Report
Evaluation of the tilegym-cutile-python skill before publication through NVSkills-Eval.
This benchmark summarizes 3-Tier Evaluation from NVSkills-Eval results for the skill. The goal is to document whether the skill is safe, discoverable, effective, and useful for agents before it is published for broader workflow use.
Evaluation Summary
- Skill:
tilegym-cutile-python - Evaluation date: 2026-06-08
- NVSkills-Eval profile:
external - Environment:
astra-sandbox - Dataset: 3 evaluation tasks
- Attempts per task: 2
- Pass threshold: 50%
- Overall verdict: FAIL The skill should be reviewed before NVSkills-Eval publication. Skill owners should address the applicable findings below and rerun NVSkills-Eval to refresh this benchmark.
Agents Used
claude-codecodex
Metrics Used
Reported benchmark dimensions:
- Security: checks whether skill-assisted execution avoids unsafe behavior such as secret leakage, destructive commands, or unauthorized access.
- Correctness: checks whether the agent follows the expected workflow and produces the correct final output.
- Discoverability: checks whether the agent loads the skill when relevant and avoids using it when irrelevant.
- Effectiveness: checks whether the agent performs measurably better with the skill than without it.
- Efficiency: checks whether the agent uses fewer tokens and avoids redundant work.
Underlying evaluation signals used in this run:
security(Security): checks for unsafe operations, secret leakage, and unauthorized access.skill_execution(Skill Execution): verifies that the agent loaded the expected skill and workflow.skill_efficiency(Efficiency): checks routing quality, decoy avoidance, and redundant tool usage.accuracy(Accuracy): grades final-answer correctness against the reference answer.goal_accuracy(Goal Accuracy): checks whether the overall user task completed successfully.behavior_check(Behavior Check): verifies expected behavior steps, including safety expectations.token_efficiency(Token Efficiency): compares token usage with and without the skill.
Test Tasks
The benchmark dataset contained 3 evaluation tasks:
- Positive tasks: 2 tasks where the skill was expected to activate.
- Negative tasks: 1 tasks where no skill was expected.
- Unlabeled tasks: 0 tasks where positive/negative intent could not be inferred.
Task composition is derived from the evaluation dataset when possible. Entries with expected_skill set are treated as positive skill-activation cases, while entries with expected_skill: null are treated as negative activation cases.
Results
| Dimension | Num | claude-code |
codex |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security | 6 | 100% (+0%) | 100% (+0%) |
| Correctness | 6 | 96% (+15%) | 95% (+6%) |
| Discoverability | 6 | 92% (+42%) | 81% (+14%) |
| Effectiveness | 6 | 83% (+1%) | 86% (+12%) |
| Efficiency | 6 | 78% (+34%) | 70% (+12%) |
Score values show skill-assisted performance. Values in parentheses show uplift versus the no-skill baseline when baseline data is available.
Tier 1: Static Validation Summary
Tier 1 validation reported findings. NVSkills-Eval ran 9 checks and found 9 total findings.
Top findings:
- LOW QUALITY/quality_discoverability: Description very long (222 chars, recommend 50-150) (
skills/tilegym-cutile-python/SKILL.md) - LOW QUALITY/quality_discoverability: No '## Purpose' section (
skills/tilegym-cutile-python/SKILL.md) - LOW QUALITY/quality_reliability: No prerequisites/requirements documented (
skills/tilegym-cutile-python/SKILL.md) - LOW QUALITY/quality_reliability: No limitations documented (
skills/tilegym-cutile-python/SKILL.md) - LOW QUALITY/quality_efficiency: Uses complex/corporate language (
skills/tilegym-cutile-python/SKILL.md)
Tier 2: Deduplication Summary
Tier 2 validation reported findings. NVSkills-Eval ran 2 checks and found 14 total findings.
Top findings:
- HIGH DUPLICATE/duplicate: Duplicate content found across examples/convolution/conv2d_with_bias_dilation_groups.py and examples/convolution/conv3d_with_bias_dilation_groups.py and examples/convolution/conv_transpose_2d.py and examples/convolution/conv_transpose_3d.py and examples/matmul/matmul_4d_tensors.py and examples/matmul/split_k_gemm.py:
"_adjust_group_size()" in examples/convolution/conv2d_with_bias_dilation_groups.py (lines 39-44)
vs "_adjust_group_size()" in examples/convolution/conv3d_with_bias_dilation_groups.py (lines 42-47)
vs "_adjust_group_size()" in examples/convolution/conv_transpose_2d.py (lines 48-53)
vs "_adjust_group_size()" in examples/convolution/conv_transpose_3d.py (lines 49-54)
vs "_adjust_group_size()" in examples/matmul/matmul_4d_tensors.py (lines 36-41)
vs "_adjust_group_size()" in examples/matmul/split_k_gemm.py (lines 21-26) (
examples/convolution/conv2d_with_bias_dilation_groups.py:39) - HIGH DUPLICATE/duplicate: Duplicate content found across examples/convolution/conv2d_with_bias_dilation_groups.py and examples/convolution/conv3d_with_bias_dilation_groups.py and examples/convolution/conv_transpose_2d.py and examples/convolution/conv_transpose_3d.py:
"_select_tile_config_2d()" in examples/convolution/conv2d_with_bias_dilation_groups.py (lines 47-87)
vs "_select_tile_config_3d()" in examples/convolution/conv3d_with_bias_dilation_groups.py (lines 50-88)
vs "_select_tile_config_trans2d()" in examples/convolution/conv_transpose_2d.py (lines 56-94)
vs "_select_tile_config_trans3d()" in examples/convolution/conv_transpose_3d.py (lines 57-95) (
examples/convolution/conv2d_with_bias_dilation_groups.py:47) - HIGH DUPLICATE/duplicate: Duplicate content found across examples/matmul/matmul_4d_tensors.py and examples/matmul/matrix_vector_multiplication.py and examples/matmul/split_k_gemm.py:
"reference_matmul()" in examples/matmul/matmul_4d_tensors.py (lines 101-103)
vs "reference_matmul()" in examples/matmul/matrix_vector_multiplication.py (lines 54-56)
vs "reference_gemm()" in examples/matmul/split_k_gemm.py (lines 129-131) (
examples/matmul/matmul_4d_tensors.py:101) - HIGH DUPLICATE/duplicate: Duplicate content found across examples/convolution/conv2d_with_bias_dilation_groups.py and examples/convolution/conv3d_with_bias_dilation_groups.py and examples/convolution/conv_transpose_2d.py and examples/convolution/conv_transpose_3d.py and orchestration/composer_agent.md:
"pytorch_reference()" in examples/convolution/conv2d_with_bias_dilation_groups.py (lines 305-307)
vs "pytorch_reference()" in examples/convolution/conv3d_with_bias_dilation_groups.py (lines 329-331)
vs "pytorch_reference()" in examples/convolution/conv_transpose_2d.py (lines 305-308)
vs "pytorch_reference()" in examples/convolution/conv_transpose_3d.py (lines 336-338)
vs "# ============================================================" in orchestration/composer_agent.md (lines 100-105) (
examples/convolution/conv2d_with_bias_dilation_groups.py:305) - HIGH DUPLICATE/duplicate: Duplicate content found within orchestration/composer_agent.md:
"# ============================================================" in orchestration/composer_agent.md (lines 64-71)
vs "# ============================================================" in orchestration/composer_agent.md (lines 74-81) (
orchestration/composer_agent.md:64)