All skills
simota avatar

/accord

@7e6967c
by shingo imotasimota/agent-skills85 stars
15

Authoring unified specification packages across Business/Development/Design teams via staged elaboration (L0 Vision, L1 Requirements, L2 Team Detail, L3 Acceptance Criteria). Use for cross-team specs.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/simota/agent-skills/accord

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

referencespecification-calibration.md

≈991 tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Specification Calibration System

Purpose: Use this file when running UNIFY, measuring specification effectiveness, or tuning scope heuristics.

Contents

  • UNIFY loop
  • logging schema
  • evaluation metrics
  • calibration rules
  • section effectiveness
  • propagation format

UNIFY Loop

RECORD -> EVALUATE -> CALIBRATE -> PROPAGATE

  • run after each delivered package
  • run a deeper review every 3 specs or quarterly, whichever comes first
  • record to .agents/accord.md

RECORD Schema

Spec: [spec-id]
Scope: [Full | Standard | Lite]
Feature_Complexity: [High | Medium | Low]
Teams_Involved: [Biz+Dev+Design | Biz+Dev | Dev+Design | Biz+Design | Single]
Requirements_Count: [N]
BDD_Scenarios_Count: [N]
Sections_Used:
  L0: [yes/no]
  L1: [yes/no]
  L2_Biz: [yes/no]
  L2_Dev: [yes/no]
  L2_Design: [yes/no]
  L3: [yes/no]
Traceability_Completeness: [0-100%]
Cross_Team_Alignment:
  biz_understanding: [High/Medium/Low]
  dev_understanding: [High/Medium/Low]
  design_understanding: [High/Medium/Low]
Revisions_Required: [count]
Downstream_Handoff: [Sherpa/Builder/Radar/Voyager/Canvas/None]

Evaluation Metrics

Alignment

Alignment = (Biz + Dev + Design understanding) / 3

Result Interpretation
all High excellent package
mixed moderate alignment, inspect wording and coverage
any Low weak package, inspect the failing audience

Scope Accuracy

Range Interpretation
> 0.85 scope heuristic is working well
0.70-0.85 some over- or under-scoping
< 0.70 review complexity indicators

Evaluation Triggers

Trigger Inspect
teams ask for clarification after delivery wording and audience fit
package needs 3+ revision rounds scope or missing sections
downstream agent cannot use the package directly output shape and detail level
implementation drifts from the spec requirement completeness and BDD quality
quarterly review aggregate effectiveness

Calibration Rules

  1. do not change heuristics before at least 3 specs exist
  2. maximum adjustment per cycle: +/-0.15
  3. decay adjustments by 10% each quarter toward default values
  4. explicit user instruction overrides all calibrated defaults

Section Effectiveness Defaults

section_effectiveness:
  L0_vision: 0.95
  L1_requirements: 0.95
  L2_biz: 0.80
  L2_dev: 0.90
  L2_design: 0.75
  L3_bdd: 0.90
  L3_traceability: 0.70

Writing Pattern Hints

Pattern Typical effect Best fit
problem-first L0 very high all scopes
explicit MoSCoW in L1 high Standard, Full
visual user flow in L2-Design high UI-heavy work
inline technical example in L2-Dev high API-heavy work
BDD with concrete values very high all scopes
shared glossary medium to high Full or terminology-heavy work

Propagation Format

## YYYY-MM-DD - UNIFY: [Scope x Teams]

**Specs assessed**: N
**Average alignment**: [High/Medium/Low]
**Key insight**: [insight]
**Calibration adjustment**: [old -> new]
**Apply when**: [future context]
**reusable**: true

<!-- EVOLUTION_SIGNAL
type: PATTERN
source: Accord
date: YYYY-MM-DD
summary: [specification insight]
affects: [Accord, Scribe, Lore]
priority: MEDIUM
reusable: true
-->

Context Library

Context Best scope Typical strong sections
new product feature across 3 teams Full all L2 + full L3
API extension for Biz + Dev Standard L2-Dev, L2-Biz, L3
UI improvement for Design + Dev Standard L2-Design, L2-Dev, L3
business-impacting bug fix Lite compact L0, key L3
infra change for Dev only Lite inline L2-Dev, key L3

Quick UNIFY

Use this when fewer than 3 specs exist:

## Quick UNIFY

**Specs assessed**: 1
**Scope**: Standard
**Note**: [observation]
**Action**: No weight change yet

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

No alerts4mo5 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub4mo

    Accord is a specification authoring skill designed for cross-functional team alignment. It focuses on generating documentation, requirements, and BDD scenarios. The security audit found no evidence of malicious behavior, data exfiltration, or unauthorized command execution.

  • Socket4mo

    No alerts

  • Snyk4mo

    Risk: LOW · No issues

  • Runlayer6mo

    1/12 files flagged

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at 7e6967c. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 2 days ago.

Activeupdated 2 months ago

README badge

README badge for simota/agent-skills/accord