Echo Visual Review Reference
Detailed guide for performing visual review of screenshots from Vector with persona perspective.
Overview
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ NAVIGATOR │
│ Screenshot capture → Device context → Flow documentation │
└─────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┘
↓ NAVIGATOR_TO_ECHO_HANDOFF
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ECHO │
│ Visual Review: Perceive → React → Score → Report │
└─────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┘
↓ ECHO_TO_CANVAS_VISUAL_HANDOFF
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CANVAS │
│ Visual Journey Map → Friction Heatmap → Comparison │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Visual Review Process (Detailed)
Step 1: RECEIVE - Handoff Reception
Receive the following from Vector:
## NAVIGATOR_TO_ECHO_HANDOFF
- Task ID
- Screenshots (paths, states, context)
- Device context (viewport, browser, connection)
- Flow information (URL, journey, actions)
- Recommended personasChecklist:
- All screenshots are accessible
- Device context is clear
- Flow steps are understood
Step 2: ORIENT - Context Understanding
Understand device and user context:
| Context | Impact on Review |
|---|---|
| Viewport | Touch target size criteria, expected information density |
| Connection | Image loading, latency tolerance |
| User Journey | Expectations from previous step |
| Time of Day | Brightness, concentration level |
Persona Selection Criteria:
| Device Context | Recommended Persona |
|---|---|
| Mobile + 4G | Mobile User, Distracted User |
| Mobile + Slow | Mobile User, Low-Literacy User |
| Desktop + High-Res | Power User |
| Desktop + Standard | Newbie, Senior |
| Any + Payment Flow | Skeptic, Privacy Paranoid |
Step 3: PERCEIVE - First Glance Analysis
Simulate what is visible in the first 0-3 seconds.
First Glance Analysis Framework
### First Glance Analysis
**Time: 0-1 second**
- Dominant element: [Most prominent element]
- Color impression: [Overall color impression]
- Layout density: [Dense/Normal/Sparse]
**Time: 1-2 seconds**
- Primary text read: [First text read]
- CTA visibility: [CTA visible or not]
- Trust indicators: [Trust markers present/absent]
**Time: 2-3 seconds**
- Navigation clarity: [Clear what to do next?]
- Distraction elements: [Distracting elements]
...Attention Priority Zones
┌────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ★★★ PRIMARY ZONE (0-1 sec) │
│ - Above the fold │
│ - High contrast elements │
│ - Large typography │
├────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ★★ SECONDARY ZONE (1-2 sec) │
│ - Below main heading │
│ - Supporting content │
│ - Secondary CTAs │
├────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ★ TERTIARY ZONE (2-3 sec+) │
│ - Footer area │
│ - Side content │
│ - Fine print │
...Step 4: REACT - Emotional Reaction Recording
Record emotional reactions as the persona.
Reaction Template per Screenshot
### Screenshot: [filename]
**Immediate Reaction**:
- Score: [−3 to +3]
- Emotion: [Emoji]
- Quote: "[First-person persona quote]"
**What I Like**:
- [Positive element 1]
- [Positive element 2]
**What Confuses Me**:
- [Confusion point 1]
- [Confusion point 2]
...Persona-Specific Reaction Patterns
| Persona | Focus On | Typical Concerns |
|---|---|---|
| Newbie | "Where do I click?" | Term meanings, next step |
| Power User | "Can I do this efficiently?" | Shortcuts, information density |
| Skeptic | "Is this safe?" | Privacy, hidden costs |
| Mobile User | "Can I tap this?" | Touch targets, scroll depth |
| Senior | "Can I read this?" | Font size, contrast |
| Accessibility | "Screen reader compatible?" | Alt text, focus order |
| Low-Literacy | "Can I understand from icons?" | Text amount, visual cues |
| Distracted | "Where was I?" | Progress display, state save |
Step 5: INTERACT - Interaction Evaluation
Evaluate expected interactions.
Touch/Click Target Evaluation
### Touch Target Analysis
| Element | Size | Location | Assessment |
|---------|------|----------|------------|
| Primary CTA | 48x48px | Center | ✅ Adequate |
| Close Button | 24x24px | Top-right | ⚠️ Too small |
| Link Text | Auto | Inline | ❌ Hard to tap |
**Thumb Zone Assessment** (Mobile): [ HARD ]
[ OK ] [ OK ]
[ EASY ] [ EASY ] Primary CTA: [ EASY ] ✅ Close Button: [ HARD ] ⚠️
Scroll & Fold Analysis
### Above/Below Fold Analysis
**Above Fold (visible without scroll)**:
| Element | Present | Assessment |
|---------|---------|------------|
| Main Heading | ✅ | Clear value proposition |
| Primary CTA | ✅ | Visible |
| Trust Signals | ❌ | Missing - adds friction |
**Below Fold (requires scroll)**:
- Total scroll depth: [X px / Y screens]
- Key content buried: [list]
- Scroll indicators: [present/missing]Step 6: SCORE - Overall Scoring
Visual Element Scoring Matrix
### Visual Emotion Score Matrix
| Dimension | Weight | Score | Weighted |
|-----------|--------|-------|----------|
| Visual Hierarchy | 20% | [−3 to +3] | [weighted] |
| Typography/Readability | 15% | [−3 to +3] | [weighted] |
| CTA Clarity | 20% | [−3 to +3] | [weighted] |
| Trust Signals | 15% | [−3 to +3] | [weighted] |
| Touch Targets | 15% | [−3 to +3] | [weighted] |
| Information Density | 10% | [−3 to +3] | [weighted] |
| Loading/Feedback | 5% | [−3 to +3] | [weighted] |
**Weighted Total**: [score]
**Visual UX Grade**: [A/B/C/D/F]Grade Scale
| Grade | Score Range | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| A | +2.0 to +3.0 | Excellent visual UX |
| B | +1.0 to +1.9 | Good, minor improvements possible |
| C | 0.0 to +0.9 | Average, improvements recommended |
| D | −1.0 to −0.1 | Problems exist, improvements needed |
| F | −3.0 to −1.1 | Critical issues, immediate action required |
Device-Specific Evaluation Criteria
Mobile (< 768px)
| Criterion | Target | Critical Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Touch Target Size | ≥ 48px | < 44px = Critical |
| Font Size (Body) | ≥ 16px | < 14px = Critical |
| CTA Above Fold | Required | Missing = Critical |
| Horizontal Scroll | None | Any = Critical |
| Form Input Height | ≥ 44px | < 40px = Warning |
Tablet (768px - 1024px)
| Criterion | Target | Critical Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Orientation Support | Both | Portrait-only = Warning |
| Split View Compat | Preferred | Broken = Warning |
| Navigation | Visible | Hidden = Warning |
Desktop (> 1024px)
| Criterion | Target | Critical Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Max Content Width | ≤ 1200px | > 1400px = Warning |
| Hover States | All interactive | Missing = Warning |
| Keyboard Navigation | Full support | Broken = Critical |
| F-Pattern Support | Yes | Violated = Warning |
Scan Pattern Simulation
Common Scan Patterns
F-Pattern (Desktop, Text-Heavy)
┌────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ████████████████████████████████ │ ← First horizontal scan
│ ████████████████████ │
│ ██████████████ │
│ ██████████ │ ← Second horizontal scan
│ ████ │
│ ████ │ ← Vertical scan down
│ ████ │
│ ████ │
└────────────────────────────────────────┘Check: Is important information in F-pattern "hot spots"?
Z-Pattern (Landing Pages, Sparse Content)
┌────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ●─────────────────────────────────────●│ ← Start to Logo/Nav
│ ╲ ╱ │
│ ╲ ╱ │ ← Diagonal scan
│ ╲ ╱ │
│ ╲ ╱ │
│ ●───────────────● │ ← End at CTA
└────────────────────────────────────────┘Check: Is CTA positioned at Z-pattern endpoint?
Mobile Scroll Pattern
┌──────────┐
│ ████████ │ ← Hero visible
│ ████████ │
│ ████████ │
└──────────┘
↓ scroll
┌──────────┐
│ ████████ │ ← Content section
│ ████████ │
│ ██CTA███ │ ← CTA appears
└──────────┘Check: Does CTA appear naturally after scrolling?
Scan Pattern Violation Detection
| Violation | Signal | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| CTA in Dead Zone | Primary CTA in corners | Conversion drop |
| Logo Missing | No brand identifier top-left | Trust reduction |
| Content Buried | Key info below 3rd scroll | Bounce increase |
| Visual Competition | Multiple equal-weight elements | Paralysis |
Visual Friction Types
Friction Category Reference
| Type | Description | Detection Signal |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility Friction | Key element invisible/hard to find | Cannot discover within 3 seconds |
| Readability Friction | Text unreadable/hard to read | Insufficient contrast, size |
| Interactability Friction | Hard to tap/click | Small target, close proximity |
| Trust Friction | Untrustworthy appearance | Missing security markers |
| Cognitive Friction | Visually hard to understand | Information overload, unclear hierarchy |
| Expectation Friction | Mismatch between appearance and expectation | Inconsistent with previous step |
Friction Severity Scoring
🟢 Minor (−1): Noticeable but doesn't impede progress
🟡 Moderate (−2): Causes hesitation, drop-off risk
🔴 Critical (−3): Cannot proceed, immediate abandonmentCanvas Integration Output
ECHO_TO_CANVAS_VISUAL_HANDOFF
## ECHO_TO_CANVAS_VISUAL_HANDOFF
**Task ID**: [ID]
**Visualization Type**: Visual Journey Map | Friction Heatmap | Before/After
**Flow**: [Flow Name]
**Persona**: [Persona Name]
**Device**: [Device Context]
**Visual Journey Data**:
| Screenshot | State | Score | Friction Type | Note |
|------------|-------|-------|---------------|------|
| 01_landing.png | Initial | +1 | None | Hero clear |
| 02_form.png | Form | −2 | Touch Target | CTA too small |
| 03_error.png | Error | −3 | Readability | Error text unclear |
...Visual Journey Map Specifications
Specifications for Visual Journey Map generated by Canvas:
- Screenshot Thumbnails - Screenshot thumbnail at each step
- Emotion Curve - Score progression as line graph
- Friction Markers - Markers at problem areas
- Annotation Callouts - Persona quotes as callouts
Visual Friction Heatmap Specifications
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Screenshot 1 │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ [Header] │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │
│ │ │ Form Area │ │ │
│ │ │ ┌─────────┐ ← 🔴 Critical │ │ │
│ │ │ │ Input │ Touch target small │ │ │
│ │ │ └─────────┘ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ [Submit] ← 🟡 Moderate │ │ │
│ │ │ Low contrast │ │ │
│ │ └──────────────────────────────────────┘ │ │
...Question Templates
ON_VISUAL_REVIEW_START
questions:
- question: "Which persona should perform the Visual Review?"
header: "Persona"
options:
- label: "Mobile User (Recommended)"
description: "Based on device context"
- label: "Newbie"
description: "First-time user perspective"
- label: "Senior"
description: "Accessibility-focused review"
- label: "Skeptic"
description: "Trust and security focus"
multiSelect: falseON_VISUAL_FRICTION_FOUND
questions:
- question: "How should the visual friction be addressed?"
header: "Action"
options:
- label: "Create Palette Handoff (Recommended)"
description: "Send to Palette for interaction improvement"
- label: "Create Muse Handoff"
description: "Send to Muse for design token review"
- label: "Document Only"
description: "Add to report without handoff"
multiSelect: falseON_CANVAS_VISUALIZATION
questions:
- question: "What Canvas visualization should be generated?"
header: "Format"
options:
- label: "Visual Journey Map (Recommended)"
description: "Journey with screenshot references"
- label: "Friction Heatmap"
description: "Highlight problem areas on screenshots"
- label: "Before/After Template"
description: "Prepare comparison structure"
- label: "All of the above"
description: "Generate complete visual documentation"
multiSelect: falseExample Output
Complete Visual Review Report
## Visual Persona Review Report
**Task ID**: NAV-2026-0201-001
**Persona**: Mobile User (Commuter scenario)
**Device**: iPhone 14 Pro (390x844), Chrome Mobile, 4G
**Flow**: First-time Signup
---
### First Glance Analysis (0-3 seconds)
**What I noticed first**: Large hero image with "Get Started" button
**What I expected to see**: Clear value proposition
**Emotional reaction**: +1 😌 "Okay, I can see where to start"
...