All skills
simota avatar

/ledger

@e307415
by shingo imotasimota/agent-skills85 stars
15

Optimizing FinOps and cloud cost: IaC-based estimation, right-sizing, RI/SP recommendations, anomaly detection, budget alerts, AI/GPU workload economics. Use to forecast or cut cloud spend.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/simota/agent-skills/ledger

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

referenceoptimization-strategies.md

≈1.4k tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Optimization Strategies

Purpose: Detailed methods for right-sizing, RI/SP, Spot strategy, and waste elimination. Read when: Concrete cost optimization recommendations are needed.


Right-Sizing Framework

Data Collection Requirements

Metric Minimum Period Source
CPU utilization 14 days CloudWatch / Cloud Monitoring / Azure Monitor
Memory utilization 14 days CloudWatch Agent / custom metrics
Network throughput 7 days VPC Flow Logs / Cloud NAT logs
Disk IOPS 7 days EBS metrics / Persistent Disk metrics
GPU utilization 7 days NVIDIA DCGM / CloudWatch

Instance Family Selection Guide

Workload Type Recommended Family Key Factor
General web/API t3/t3a (AWS), e2 (GCP), B-series (Azure) Burstable, cost-effective
Compute-intensive c6i/c7g (AWS), c3 (GCP), F-series (Azure) CPU-optimized
Memory-intensive r6i/r7g (AWS), n2-highmem (GCP), E-series (Azure) Memory-optimized
Storage-intensive i3/i4i (AWS), n2-standard+local SSD (GCP), L-series (Azure) NVMe local storage
ML training p4d/p5 (AWS), a2/a3 (GCP), NC-series (Azure) GPU
ML inference inf2 (AWS), g2 (GCP), NC-series (Azure) Cost-per-inference

Right-Sizing Decision Tree

CPU < 10% for 14d?
├── Yes → Is workload bursty?
│   ├── Yes → Switch to burstable (t3/e2/B-series)
│   └── No → Downsize 2 tiers
├── CPU 10-40%?
│   └── Downsize 1 tier, monitor 7d
├── CPU 40-70%?
│   └── Appropriate — no change
└── CPU > 70%?
    ├── Sustained → Scale up 1 tier
    └── Spiking → Add autoscaling

Reserved Instance / Savings Plan Strategy

AWS Commitment Options

Option Flexibility Discount Best For
Compute Savings Plan Any instance family/region/OS 40-66% Baseline compute
EC2 Instance Savings Plan Specific family in region 50-72% Predictable workloads
Standard RI Specific instance type/AZ 55-75% Unchanging workloads
Convertible RI Exchangeable 40-55% Long-term flexible

GCP Commitment Options

Option Flexibility Discount Best For
Committed Use Discount (CUD) Specific machine family/region 37-57% Predictable VMs
Flex CUD Cancelable after 1 year 20-35% Uncertain workloads
Sustained Use Discount Automatic 10-30% Always-on VMs

Azure Commitment Options

Option Flexibility Discount Best For
Azure Savings Plan Any compute 35-65% Flexible baseline
Reserved VM Instance Specific VM size/region 40-72% Predictable VMs
Spot VMs Evictable Up to 90% Fault-tolerant workloads

Coverage Analysis Template

## Commitment Coverage Analysis

### Current State
- Total monthly compute spend: $X,XXX
- On-Demand: $X,XXX (N%)
- Existing commitments: $X,XXX (N%)
- Coverage gap: $X,XXX (N%)

### Recommendation
| Commitment Type | Term | Amount | Expected Savings |
|-----------------|------|--------|-----------------|
| Compute SP | 1yr No Upfront | $X,XXX/hr | $X,XXX/mo (N%) |
| EC2 RI | 1yr Partial | N × instance | $X,XXX/mo (N%) |

### Risk Assessment
- Break-even: N months
- Flexibility impact: [description]
- Rollback plan: [description]

Spot / Preemptible Strategy

Suitability Assessment

Workload Characteristic Spot Suitability Strategy
Stateless, horizontally scalable High Spot Fleet with diversification
Batch processing High Spot with checkpointing
CI/CD runners High Spot with on-demand fallback
Dev/test environments High Spot with scheduled hours
Stateful database Low Not recommended
Latency-sensitive API Medium Mixed fleet (on-demand base + Spot)

Interruption Handling

SPOT_RESILIENCE:
  diversification:
    - Use 4+ instance types per pool
    - Spread across 3+ AZs
    - Mix generations (e.g., m5 + m6i + m7i)

  handling:
    - 2-minute warning handler (AWS)
    - Graceful shutdown hooks
    - Checkpoint/resume for long tasks
    - Automatic fallback to on-demand

  capacity_strategy:
    - lowest-price: Cost-optimized (risk of mass interruption)
    - capacity-optimized: Stability-optimized (recommended)
    - price-capacity-optimized: Balanced (AWS default)

Waste Elimination Checklist

Waste Type Detection Method Action
Idle instances (CPU < 5% for 7d+) CloudWatch/Monitoring Terminate or schedule
Unattached EBS/PD volumes API scan Snapshot + delete
Unused Elastic IPs / static IPs API scan Release
Orphaned snapshots (> 90d, no AMI) Age-based scan Delete
Over-provisioned RDS/Cloud SQL Performance Insights Downsize
Unused load balancers (0 targets) API scan Delete
Dev/staging running 24/7 Tag + schedule scan Implement schedules
Uncompressed S3/GCS lifecycle missing Bucket policy scan Add lifecycle rules
NAT Gateway with < 1GB/day VPC flow logs Consider VPC endpoints
Unused reserved capacity Utilization report Sell on marketplace / modify

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

No alerts13d4 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub13d

    The 'ledger' skill is a comprehensive FinOps and cloud cost optimization tool designed to assist with IaC cost estimation, right-sizing, and commitment strategies. A thorough security analysis found no evidence of prompt injection, data exfiltration, obfuscation, or malicious code execution. The external links provided are legitimate technical citations and references for cloud cost data.

  • Socket13d

    No alerts

  • Snyk13d

    Risk: LOW · No issues

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at e307415. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 2 days ago.

Activeupdated 2 weeks ago

README badge

README badge for simota/agent-skills/ledger