Design Methodology
Purpose: Use this file when you need the full process for REDESIGN, NEW_PRODUCT, REVIEW, or TREND_APPLICATION.
Contents:
- Mode-specific process steps
- Shared phase model
Mode Processes
REDESIGN
- Visual audit of the current state
- Composition audit: evaluate first viewport, hero contract compliance, layout restraint, and page structure against
reference/composition-principles.md - Competitive and trend analysis
- Define principles
- Create
3+directions - Detail the selected direction
- Define style guide and token direction
- Prioritize components
- Prepare delegation plan
Output: direction doc plus component specifications
NEW_PRODUCT
- integrate research and personas
- create moodboards
- define color, typography, spacing, and motion foundations
- composition audit: apply first-viewport rule, hero contract, and page structure from
reference/composition-principles.md - draft wireframes with composition principles enforced
- define token architecture
- instruct prototype work
Output: design-system foundation plus wireframes
REVIEW
- run Nielsen's 10 heuristics
- audit visual consistency
- run trend-gap analysis
- run accessibility checks
- prioritize fixes
- assign next agents
Output: improvement report plus action items
TREND_APPLICATION
- select applicable trends
- check brand alignment
- propose phased rollout
- pick pilot targets
- recommend testing approach when uncertainty is material
Output: trend application plan plus before/after concepts
Shared Phases
| Phase | Key question |
|---|---|
UNDERSTAND |
what business, user, brand, and technical constraints shape the design? |
ENVISION |
what 3+ directions could solve the problem? |
SYSTEMATIZE |
what tokens, components, states, and breakpoints define the system? |
DELEGATE |
which agents should execute what, in which order? |
VALIDATE |
what evidence shows the direction is coherent, usable, and safe? |
Per-Recipe Behavior Notes
Referenced from SKILL.md -> Subcommand Dispatch.
direction: 3+ options + trade-offs; always attach business-outcome metrics (task-success / time-on-task / conversion lift) to each option.redesign: In REDESIGN mode, modernize the current state while preserving brand consistency. Ask First if scope is 3+ pages. Always reference thebrandsubcommand result if present.trend: TREND_APPLICATION mode — limit to 2026 trends (AI-driven UI / Calm UI / Adaptive Systems / DTCG v2025.10); changes that break product identity are forbidden. Present a before/after concept diagram.system: Superset of NEW_PRODUCT. Always produce a distribution plan to Muse/Palette/Flow/Forge. Make the Core → Brand → Product token hierarchy explicit.brand: Vision strategy + brand alignment. Always define primary palette / typography pair / 5 voice keywords / 5 anti-keywords. Apply orchestrated inheritance for multi-brand. Always read the Compete report if present.moodboard: Pre-ENVISION stage. For each of 3-5 directional axes, gather reference images / palette / fonts / tone keywords; narrow 9 candidates → 3 finalists. List the differentiation axis and risk per finalist.audit: REVIEW mode. Output Nielsen 10 heuristics / WCAG 2.2 AA contrast & focus & target-size as pass/fail; detect token drift and prioritize the remediation backlog (P1/P2/P3) by effort × impact.multi: Tri-engine design-direction generation — parallel Codex/Antigravity/Claude subagents (each 2–3 directions from a loose prompt), Concurrence-Divergence scoring, aesthetic-spectrum coverage, GROUND checks (brand-fit / persona-fit / WCAG 2.2 AA / reference-existence / outcome-link / AI disclosure), and mandatory downstream handoff stubs. Portfolio merge is default; usemulti --competeonly when the user explicitly wants a single direction. Details → Multi-Engine Mode below andreference/tri-engine-direction.md.pair: Interactive co-design (INTERACTIVE — the dialogue is the deliverable). Vision drives, user navigates; propose 2-3 options → choose → produce/delegate → confirm one decision at a time. Runs within any Operating Mode; distinct frommulti(one-shot portfolio) anddirection(batch doc). VERIFY: one decision at a time (no full-direction dump), every option carrying rationale + trade-offs + a measurable outcome metric + WCAG 2.2 AA note (never "looks better"); Vision wrote no code (artifacts come from delegated cluster skills — Muse/Forge/Flow/Palette/Frame/Prose); per-decision user-choice + confirmation gate before production (never auto-lock, even under AUTORUN — draft the plan, returnNext: USER); bounded by max-decisions (12) / user-stop / direction-locked / diminishing-returns; VALIDATE (dark-pattern / WCAG / handoff-readiness) at close. Full contract →reference/co-design-pair.md.