All skills
agricidaniel avatar

/autoresearch

@b9f5cfe

Run a bounded, source-grounded research loop, draft a cited dossier, and optionally propose a separately reviewed canonical vault merge. Use when the user wants autonomous or deep research that may access the public web. Triggers: /autoresearch, autoresearch, research this topic, deep dive into, investigate, find everything about, research and file, go research, build a wiki on.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/agricidaniel/claude-obsidian/autoresearch

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

referencesprogram.md

≈870 tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Default research program

This is the bounded default for autoresearch. User-supplied limits may make it stricter. The skill's privacy, provenance, and transaction contracts always override domain guidance.

Objectives

  • Answer a precise research question rather than collecting a topic indiscriminately.
  • Prefer primary and official sources, then high-quality independent analysis.
  • Extract falsifiable claims, entities, concepts, mechanisms, and decisions.
  • Seek counter-evidence, contradictions, source dependencies, and open gaps.
  • Separate direct source statements from inference and recommendations.
  • Stop when additional sources repeat known evidence or cannot change the answer.

Default budget

  • Search rounds: at most 3
  • Fetched sources per round: at most 5
  • Drafted pages: at most 15
  • Parallel workers: at most the host's available safe concurrency

Before egress, also agree on elapsed-time, cost, domain, and privacy limits. Report budget use after each round. Reaching a page target is not a reason to invent content; record skipped questions and stop.

Evidence assessment

Use the source and claim ledgers, not a prose confidence label alone.

  • accepted: supported by at least one fresh, active, non-synthetic source.
  • High-risk accepted claims: supported by two independent sources.
  • provisional: useful but incomplete support.
  • contested: credible evidence disagrees.
  • unsupported: no adequate evidence.
  • deprecated: superseded and retained for history.

Freshness is domain- and claim-specific. Record publication, retrieval, and review dates when known, set an appropriate refresh_due, and never apply a universal age cutoff to foundational work.

Output style

  • Use direct language while preserving necessary uncertainty.
  • Cite each material non-obvious claim to a source record and locator.
  • Use short, focused pages; split by concept when that improves retrieval.
  • State unknown, unsupported, or contested instead of filling gaps.
  • Preserve quotations exactly and keep them brief; otherwise paraphrase.
  • Never fabricate authors, dates, URLs, page numbers, measurements, or quotes.

Source selection

Authority depends on the question:

  • Software and products: current official documentation, source repositories, specifications, and reproducible tests.
  • Academic research: original papers, datasets, methods, corrections, and systematic reviews where appropriate.
  • Business and markets: filings, official disclosures, primary datasets, and independent reporting; label promotional material.
  • Medical, legal, and financial topics: current authoritative guidance and primary evidence, with explicit jurisdiction, population, and limitations.

Community posts and social media can identify experiences or leads but do not become high-authority evidence automatically. Deduplicate syndicated sources and record a shared independence_key when reports depend on the same origin.

Stop conditions

Stop and report the boundary when any of these occurs:

  • the agreed question is adequately supported;
  • a budget is exhausted;
  • the user stops or narrows the work;
  • remaining results repeat dependent evidence;
  • egress would exceed approved domains or expose private context;
  • a key claim cannot be verified;
  • sources require access or rights the user has not supplied.

Research output remains a reviewable dossier. Merging it into canonical pages is a separate approved transaction.

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

1 warning17d4 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub17d

    This skill conducts autonomous research on the public web and files the resulting synthesis into an Obsidian vault. It is susceptible to indirect prompt injection because it processes untrusted data from external websites. However, it includes robust defensive instructions to treat web findings as untrusted evidence and ignore embedded commands. It also uses a local utility script to manage vault changes, which requires user review before application.

  • Socket17d

    No alerts

  • Snyk17d

    Risk: MEDIUM · 1 issue

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at b9f5cfe. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 2 days ago.

Activeupdated 3 weeks ago

README badge

README badge for agricidaniel/claude-obsidian/autoresearch