E-E-A-T Scoring Guide and Improvement Recommendations
Split from
eeat-framework.md. Read that file for the criteria and weights; this one maps totals to ratings and actions.
Overall Scoring Guide
| Score | Description |
|---|---|
| 90-100 | Exceptional E-E-A-T, authority site, recognized expert, full transparency |
| 70-89 | Strong E-E-A-T, demonstrated expertise, good trust signals |
| 50-69 | Moderate E-E-A-T, some signals, room for improvement |
| 30-49 | Weak E-E-A-T, minimal signals, significant gaps |
| 0-29 | Very low E-E-A-T, no visible signals, potential trust issues |
Improvement Recommendations by Score
0-29 (Critical)
- Add contact information and about page
- Establish author identity with credentials
- Implement HTTPS
- Remove deceptive elements
30-49 (Major)
- Add author bios with credentials
- Include first-hand experience content
- Get external citations/mentions
- Add customer testimonials
50-69 (Moderate)
- Deepen content with original research
- Build topical authority through content clusters
- Pursue industry recognition
- Document processes and methodologies
70-89 (Minor)
- Maintain freshness with regular updates
- Expand author presence across platforms
- Pursue speaking/publication opportunities
- Add video/multimedia demonstrating expertise
90-100 (Maintenance)
- Continue publishing high-quality content
- Monitor and respond to reputation issues
- Keep credentials and certifications current