All skills
anthropics avatar

/scientific-problem-selection

@7c35640

This skill should be used when scientists need help with research problem selection, project ideation, troubleshooting stuck projects, or strategic scientific decisions. Use this skill when users ask to pitch a new research idea, work through a project problem, evaluate project risks, plan research strategy, navigate decision trees, or get help choosing what scientific problem to work on. Typical requests include "I have an idea for a project", "I'm stuck on my research", "help me evaluate this project", "what should I work on", or "I need strategic advice about my research".

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/scientific-problem-selection

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

references05-decision-tree.md

≈824 tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

SKILL 5: Decision Tree Navigation ("The Altitude Dance")

Overview

This skill teaches you to move fluidly between execution (Level 1: getting stuff done) and strategic evaluation (Level 2: critical thinking). Projects rarely unfold linearly—they require frequent course correction. Most trainees should spend MORE time on their project's decision tree.

Core Principle

"Learn the altitude dance"

Move back and forth frequently between:

  • Level 1: Full immersion in experimental details or coding
  • Level 2: Step back, clear your head, evaluate as if someone else did the work

These cannot be done simultaneously. The key to navigating a project's decision tree is alternating between these levels deliberately.

Key Concepts

Why Decision Trees Matter: Once you're in a project, the landscape changes:

  • You've learned from initial experiments
  • New papers have been published
  • Technology has advanced
  • Your assumptions have been tested

At any decision point, you should rarely follow your plan from 2 years ago—there will be a better alternative.

The Altitude Levels:

  • Level 1 (Ground Level): Doing the work, troubleshooting, optimizing
  • Level 2 (Strategic Altitude): What did we learn? What should we do next?
  • Level 3 (Field Altitude): How does this fit in the broader landscape?
  • Level 4 (Career Altitude): Is this the right use of my finite time?

Common Failure Modes:

  1. Stuck in Level 1: Troubleshooting endlessly without reassessing the plan
  2. Only Level 2: Brilliant strategist but never rolls up sleeves
  3. No rhythm: Switching randomly instead of deliberately

Workflow

Phase 1: Map Your Decision Tree

For your project, identify:

  1. Initial plan: What was the intended path?
  2. Branch points: Where might alternative paths emerge?
  3. Decision criteria: What determines which branch to take?
  4. New information: What could change the landscape?

Phase 2: Establish Your Rhythm

Recommended Schedule:

  • Daily: Level 1 work (experiments, coding, analysis)
  • Weekly: Level 2 evaluation (1-2 hours, ideally Friday afternoon)
  • Monthly: Level 3 field review (read new papers, attend seminars)
  • Quarterly: Level 4 career check-in (with mentor)

Level 2 Weekly Protocol:

  1. Clear your head (walk, coffee, change of scene)
  2. Review what happened this week
  3. Ask: What did we learn?
  4. Ask: What should happen next?
  5. Update decision tree
  6. Plan next week's Level 1 work

Phase 3: Decision Points

At each major branch point:

Example: Genetic Screen Hits Wall

Instead of endless troubleshooting:

  • Alternative 1: Redo computational analysis with larger genome dataset
  • Alternative 2: Use AlphaFold models to search for similar folds
  • Alternative 3: Print and test larger candidate set (DNA synthesis cheaper now)

Framework:

  1. Acknowledge the stuck point
  2. Step to Level 2: Evaluate with fresh eyes
  3. Consider: What's newly possible? (technology, knowledge)
  4. Generate 3 alternatives
  5. Decide: Troubleshoot more vs. pursue alternative

Output: Decision Tree Map

  • Visual map of your project's decision points
  • Update frequency schedule
  • Criteria for each branch point
  • Protocol for getting unstuck

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

1 warning16d5 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub16d

    This skill provides a structured conversational framework for scientific problem selection based on established academic research. It guides users through ideation, risk assessment, and strategic planning. No security issues were detected.

  • Socket16d

    No alerts

  • Snyk16d

    Risk: LOW · No issues

  • Runlayer7mo

    11/11 files flagged

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at 7c35640. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub last week.

Activeupdated 8 months ago

README badge

README badge for anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/scientific-problem-selection