All skills
deanpeters avatar

/intelligence-collection-disciplines

@ba3fc8c

Run competitive research like an intelligence agency: eight collection disciplines (OSINT to MASINT), signal-to-inference chains, and fusion. Use when one-source research isn't enough.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/deanpeters/product-manager-skills/intelligence-collection-disciplines

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

examplessample-industrial.md

≈1.4k tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Intelligence Collection Disciplines — Worked Example (Industrial)

All companies, products, URLs, and figures are fictional. Industrial sibling of sample.md — and the one where the physical-world disciplines finally star. The SaaS plan consciously skipped MASINT and GEOINT/DEMOINT; this plan runs them, because the target leaves fingerprints in customs records, certification registries, and facility permits that no SaaS competitor ever files.


Collection Plan: Meridian Freight Systems / plant-floor automation entry

Instantiation

[TARGET] = Meridian Freight Systems [MARKET] = plant-floor automation & monitoring; NAICS 333 (machinery mfg) / 334 (instruments), buyers in NAICS 31-33 [GEOGRAPHY] = United States, Canada [BUYER] = plant managers and corporate engineering, discrete manufacturers 100-500 employees [CAPABILITY] = extending their warehouse-robotics platform onto the manufacturing floor [DECISION] = how much 2027 roadmap Northfield fences off for a defensive play — and of what kind

Discipline Selection

Discipline Running? Why (which signal chains) Key sources (free first)
OSINT ✅ light conference footprint + solutions-page language shifts trade-show exhibitor lists, their site
FININT ◻ not yet private; re-opens on any raise or when partner firms (public) name them in filings Crunchbase, partner 10-Ks
GEOINT/DEMOINT ✅ terrain check: does the target segment exist at the size their move implies? establishment counts by NAICS + employee band census County Business Patterns
TECHINT ✅ API docs diffs (asset-class modeling) + patent classifications drifting from warehouse to general industrial their docs, patents.google.com
HUMINT ✅ domain-hiring chain: controls engineers/channel roles = staffing the bet; absence is also a signal LinkedIn jobs, careers page
SIGINT ✅ new subdomains, early-access forms, solutions-page diffs crt.sh, Wayback
MASINT ✅ the star here: customs component volumes, certification registry progress, facility permits ImportYeti-class trade data, cert registry, local permit records

Six running — more than the SaaS plan's four, justified: a physical-product entry emits on more channels, and [DECISION] hinges on timing, which the physical channels date best.

Cadence

  • Monthly (SIGINT + OSINT, ~30 min): solutions-page diff; crt.sh; exhibitor-list scan for manufacturing trade shows
  • Quarterly (MASINT + TECHINT deep pass): customs volumes; certification registry status; patent classification sweep; API docs diff
  • Annual (GEOINT/DEMOINT): refresh the establishment-count terrain when census data updates
  • Event-driven (48h): certification status change; any funding event (re-opens FININT); domain hiring appearing

Fusion Table (as of 2026-11-28)

Discipline Signal found Label Source URL + date
MASINT cert filing "in process," plant-floor equipment class, via subsidiary Fact registry, Oct 2026
MASINT component imports up two consecutive quarters Fact trade data, Nov 2026
SIGINT "Manufacturing early access" form on solutions page Fact page diff, Nov 2026
TECHINT API models generic asset classes; patent filings still warehouse-classified Fact docs; patents, Nov 2026
HUMINT no manufacturing-domain hires — zero controls/channel postings Fact (absence) job boards, Nov 2026
GEOINT/DEMOINT target segment: ~38k establishments in band across [GEOGRAPHY] — the move's math works Fact census CBP, 2026

Fusion verdict: 4 channels say building, 1 says not-staffing → conflict → dig → registry detail names a partner engineering firm as responsible party — Fact. Resolved reading: partner-led entry, 12-36 months out (certification clock) — actionable, with the response aimed at the partner layer, not the product layer.

Provenance & Guardrails

  • Registry and customs pages archived at collection date (registries restructure; permit portals purge)
  • All sources public: filings, registries, published records, their own site. Stage test: clean — every method here could be described at Meridian's user conference without a wince.

Why this example works

  • MASINT earned its seat. Customs volumes and a certification registry did what no SaaS source can: they dated the threat (12-36 month certification clock) and graded it as commitment rather than ambition. This is the discipline the SaaS sibling rightly skipped and this market rightly runs.
  • An absence is in the fusion table as a Fact. Zero domain hires is checkable, dated, sourced — and it's the signal that triggered the conflict rule and found the partner-led vector. Fusion tables that only admit positive signals miss the most interesting rows.
  • GEOINT/DEMOINT played its quiet role: the terrain check. Before treating the move as rational, the plan verified the target segment exists at entry-justifying scale — the discipline that keeps you from imputing a strategy the market couldn't support.
  • Six disciplines here, four in SaaS — both defended. Discipline count follows what the target emits and what the decision needs, not a completeness instinct. The two siblings demonstrate the selection logic from opposite directions.

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

1 warning1mo3 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub1mo

    The skill provides a framework for competitive intelligence research. While the methodology is sound, it inherently involves processing data from untrusted external sources, presenting a low risk for indirect prompt injection.

  • Socket1mo

    No alerts

  • Snyk1mo

    Risk: MEDIUM · 1 issue

Signed by skilld at ba3fc8c. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub last month.

Activeupdated 2 months ago
type
component
theme
market-intelligence
estimated_time
reference skill; a single-discipline pass takes 30-60 min
Other metadata
intent
Give product managers the intelligence community's collection playbook: eight independent disciplines, each with free and paid sources, signal-to-inference chains, and the PM artifact it feeds — then fuse them with confidence stacking so three weak signals become one strong conclusion.
best_for
[
  "Choosing which collection channels to run for a competitive or market question",
  "Turning raw public signals (patents, job posts, filings, web diffs) into defensible inferences",
  "Cross-validating a suspected competitor move across independent evidence channels"
]
scenarios
[
  "I think a competitor is building a platform play — how do I confirm it before their launch?",
  "My TAM slide got shredded — where do I find data that survives scrutiny?"
]

README badge

README badge for deanpeters/product-manager-skills/intelligence-collection-disciplines