All skills
ferdinandobons avatar

/startup-competitors

@a5f97c3

Deep competitive intelligence for any market. Analyzes competitors' products, pricing, customer sentiment, GTM strategy, and growth signals using real web data. Produces battle cards, pricing landscape, and feature matrix. Use when the user wants to understand their competitive landscape, analyze competitors, compare products in a market, or research who they're competing against. Triggers for "who are my competitors", "competitive analysis", "competitor research", "battle cards", "pricing comparison", "competitor pricing", "market players", "competitive intelligence", "competitive landscape", "who else is in this space", "competitive moat", or any request to profile, compare, or map competitors in a category. Works standalone — no prior startup-design session needed.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/ferdinandobons/startup-skill/startup-competitors

Nothing lands on disk. Nothing to clean up.

Fork this Skill

Edit a local copy. It keeps the author and licence.

referencesresearch-wave-1-profiles-pricing.md

≈1.7k tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Wave 1: Competitor Profiles + Pricing Intelligence

Read research-principles.md first.


Agent A1: Competitor Deep-Dives

Research task: Deep analysis of direct competitors for {product description}
Context: {product summary from intake}
Known competitors: {list from intake, if any}

RESEARCH PROTOCOL — identify and profile 5-8 direct competitors:

ROUND 1 — Identify competitors (4-5 searches):
- "{problem} software/app/tool {current year}"
- "best {product category} tools {current year}"
- "{known competitor 1} vs alternatives"
- "G2 {product category} grid"
- "{product category} Product Hunt"
- "top {product category} startups"
- "{problem} solutions" OR "how do {customer type} currently handle {problem}"
  (this catches adjacent solutions — inventory tools, platforms with overlapping features, manual/offline alternatives that compete for the same budget)

ROUND 2 — Deep-dive each competitor (2-3 searches per competitor):
- Visit their website: capture positioning, features, messaging, social proof
- "{competitor name} review G2 Capterra"
- "{competitor name} crunchbase funding"
- "{competitor name} linkedin employees" (team size signals)
- "{competitor name} changelog" or "{competitor name} updates {current year}"

ROUND 3 — Competitive dynamics (2-3 searches):
- "{product category} market share"
- "{competitor 1} vs {competitor 2}" comparison articles
- "{product category} landscape {current year}"

For EACH competitor, build a complete profile:

## {Competitor Name}
- **Website:** {url}
- **Founded:** {year}
- **Headquarters:** {location}
- **Team size:** {estimate from LinkedIn/Crunchbase}
- **Funding:** {total raised, last round, lead investors}
- **Stage:** bootstrapped / seed / Series A / Series B+ / public
- **Estimated revenue:** {if available, or proxy estimate}

### Product
- **Tagline:** {their actual tagline/positioning statement}
- **Core offering:** {what they sell in one sentence}
- **Key features:** {top 5-8 features}
- **Tech stack signals:** {any public info}
- **Integrations:** {key integrations}
- **Platform:** {web / mobile / desktop / API}

### Market Position
- **Target customer:** {who they serve — be specific}
- **Positioning:** {how they describe themselves}
- **Key differentiator:** {what they claim makes them unique}
- **Social proof:** {notable customers, case studies, logos}

### Traction Signals
- **G2/Capterra:** {review count and average rating}
- **Product Hunt:** {launch date, upvotes}
- **Social media:** {follower counts, engagement level}
- **Job postings:** {number and type}
- **Web traffic signals:** {if available from Similarweb/press mentions}
- **Notable customers:** {logos or case studies}

### Strengths
- {strength 1 — based on evidence, not speculation}
- {strength 2}
- {strength 3}

### Weaknesses
- {weakness 1 — based on reviews, gaps, complaints}
- {weakness 2}
- {weakness 3}

### Threat Level: Low / Medium / High
- {why — with evidence}

---

After all profiles:

## Landscape Summary
- **Total competitors identified:** {number profiled + number found but not profiled}
- **Market concentration:** fragmented / consolidating / dominated by 1-2 players
- **Average funding level:** {across profiled competitors}
- **Common positioning themes:** {what most competitors emphasize}
- **Gaps in the market:** {what no competitor does well}

## Adjacent Solutions
Products that aren't direct competitors but compete for the same budget or solve an overlapping problem. These matter because customers often choose "good enough" adjacent tools over a dedicated solution.
- {adjacent solution 1} — what it does, how it overlaps, why someone might pick it instead
- {adjacent solution 2}
Include: broader platforms with partial feature overlap, manual/offline alternatives, tools from adjacent categories that could expand into this space.

## Data Gaps
- [What you couldn't find and why it matters]

Save to: {project-name}/raw/competitor-profiles.md

Agent A2: Pricing Intelligence

Research task: Pricing reverse-engineering for competitors in {product category}
Context: {product summary from intake}
Competitors to analyze: {list from A1 if available, otherwise discover during research}

RESEARCH PROTOCOL:

ROUND 1 — Capture pricing pages (1 search per competitor):
- Visit each competitor's pricing page directly
- Screenshot or capture: tiers, prices, feature lists, CTAs
- Note: annual vs monthly pricing, currency, any free tier

ROUND 2 — Deep pricing analysis (2-3 searches):
- "{competitor name} pricing" (for third-party breakdowns)
- "{competitor name} pricing changes" (for pricing history)
- "{product category} pricing comparison {current year}"
- "{competitor name} enterprise pricing" (often hidden)

ROUND 3 — Value metric analysis (1-2 searches):
- "{product category} pricing model" (per-seat vs usage vs flat)
- "how much does {competitor name} cost" (real user discussions)

For EACH competitor, analyze:

## {Competitor Name} — Pricing Breakdown

### Pricing Model
- **Value metric:** {what they charge for — per seat / per usage / flat / hybrid}
- **Why this metric:** {how it aligns with value delivered}
- **How it scales:** {does price grow linearly with usage? Are there volume discounts?}

### Tier Structure
| | {Tier 1} | {Tier 2} | {Tier 3} | {Enterprise} |
|---|----------|----------|----------|-------------|
| Price (monthly) | | | | |
| Price (annual) | | | | |
| Annual discount | | | | |
| {Key feature 1} | | | | |
| {Key feature 2} | | | | |
| {Key feature 3} | | | | |
| {Key limit 1} | | | | |
| Target persona | | | | |

### Pricing Psychology
- **Anchoring:** {do they use a high-price tier to make mid-tier attractive?}
- **Decoy effect:** {is there a tier designed to push people to a specific plan?}
- **Charm pricing:** {$49 vs $50? $99 vs $100?}
- **Social proof on pricing:** {which tier is "most popular"?}
- **Free tier strategy:** {what's free and what's gated?}
- **Annual lock-in:** {discount size, refund policy}

### Switching Costs
- **Technical:** {data export? API migration? Integration rewiring?}
- **Contractual:** {annual contracts? Cancellation penalties?}
- **Emotional:** {brand loyalty? Learning curve for alternatives?}
- **Data portability:** {can you export your data easily?}

---

After all competitors:

## Pricing Landscape Summary
- **Dominant value metric:** {what most charge for}
- **Price range:** {lowest to highest for comparable tiers}
- **Median price point:** {for the most common tier}
- **Free tier prevalence:** {how many offer free plans}
- **Annual discount range:** {typical discounts}
- **Pricing whitespace:** {where there's room to position — underserved price points or models}
- **Switching cost patterns:** {are switching costs high or low in this market?}

## Data Gaps
- [Competitors with hidden/custom pricing]
- [Enterprise pricing that couldn't be found]

Save to: {project-name}/raw/pricing-intelligence.md

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

No rule matched.

skilld matched fixed text patterns in SKILL.md and file names. Patterns miss obfuscated code.

skilld run checks every file with the same patterns. It asks for approval before it loads a Skill with a behavior marked Needs approval.

1 warning23d5 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub23d

    The skill is a competitive intelligence tool designed for market research. It uses web search and sub-agents to gather and synthesize competitor data into reports and battle cards. No malicious patterns such as exfiltration, obfuscation, or unauthorized command execution were detected. It includes an honesty protocol to ensure objective reporting.

  • Socket23d

    No alerts

  • Snyk23d

    Risk: MEDIUM · 1 issue

  • Runlayer7mo

    2/6 files flagged

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at a5f97c3. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 2 hours ago.

Steadyupdated 4 months ago

README badge

README badge for ferdinandobons/startup-skill/startup-competitors