All skills
ferdinandobons avatar

/startup-competitors

@a5f97c3

Deep competitive intelligence for any market. Analyzes competitors' products, pricing, customer sentiment, GTM strategy, and growth signals using real web data. Produces battle cards, pricing landscape, and feature matrix. Use when the user wants to understand their competitive landscape, analyze competitors, compare products in a market, or research who they're competing against. Triggers for "who are my competitors", "competitive analysis", "competitor research", "battle cards", "pricing comparison", "competitor pricing", "market players", "competitive intelligence", "competitive landscape", "who else is in this space", "competitive moat", or any request to profile, compare, or map competitors in a category. Works standalone — no prior startup-design session needed.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/ferdinandobons/startup-skill/startup-competitors

Nothing lands on disk. Nothing to clean up.

Fork this Skill

Edit a local copy. It keeps the author and licence.

referencesresearch-wave-2-sentiment-mining.md

≈1.7k tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Wave 2: Customer Sentiment Mining

Read research-principles.md first.


Agent B1: Review Mining

Research task: Mine customer reviews for competitors in {product category}
Context: {product summary from intake}
Competitors to analyze: {list from Wave A}

Review mining reveals what customers actually experience — not what competitor marketing promises. The gap between promise and reality is where opportunities live.

HANDLING SCARCE REVIEWS:
Some markets (especially B2B, niche, or emerging categories) have very few formal reviews on G2/Capterra. When this happens:
1. Expand to additional platforms: App Store, Play Store, Trustpilot, Google Maps reviews (for physical products/services), industry-specific review sites
2. Search for case studies and testimonials on competitor websites — extract the language used
3. Search for "{competitor name} experience" or "{competitor name} honest review" on blogs and YouTube
4. Lean more heavily on forum mining (Wave B2) for unfiltered opinions
5. Declare the scarcity explicitly in Data Gaps — "only X reviews found across platforms" is valuable information itself (it signals market immaturity or low switching)
Always include at least 2-3 verbatim quotes per competitor, even if they come from blog posts, tweets, or forum comments rather than formal review platforms.

RESEARCH PROTOCOL:

ROUND 1 — Aggregate review platforms (2 searches per competitor):
- "{competitor name} reviews G2"
- "{competitor name} reviews Capterra" OR "Trustradius"
- "{competitor name} reviews Product Hunt"
- "{competitor name} app store reviews" (if mobile product)

ROUND 2 — Negative review deep-dive (1-2 searches per competitor):
- "{competitor name} complaints"
- "{competitor name} problems reddit"
- "{competitor name} worst things"

ROUND 3 — Feature request patterns (1-2 searches):
- "{competitor name} feature request"
- "{competitor name} missing features"
- "{product category} wishlist"

For EACH competitor, extract:

## {Competitor Name} — Review Analysis

### Review Volume & Ratings
- **G2:** {count} reviews, {avg} stars
- **Capterra:** {count} reviews, {avg} stars
- **TrustRadius:** {count} reviews, {avg} stars
- **Product Hunt:** {upvotes}, {comment sentiment}
- **App Store / Play Store:** {if applicable}

### What People Love (top 3-5 themes)
For each theme:
- **Theme:** {e.g., "Easy onboarding"}
- **Frequency:** mentioned in ~{X}% of positive reviews
- **Verbatim quotes:**
  - "{exact quote}" — {source, date}
  - "{exact quote}" — {source, date}

### What People Hate (top 3-5 themes)
For each theme:
- **Theme:** {e.g., "Pricing feels unfair at scale"}
- **Frequency:** mentioned in ~{X}% of negative reviews
- **Severity:** annoyance / blocker / deal-breaker
- **Verbatim quotes:**
  - "{exact quote}" — {source, date}
  - "{exact quote}" — {source, date}

### Most Requested Features
- {feature 1} — mentioned {X} times
- {feature 2} — mentioned {X} times
- {feature 3} — mentioned {X} times

### Churn Signals
Reasons people leave this competitor:
- {reason 1 — with evidence}
- {reason 2 — with evidence}
- {reason 3 — with evidence}

---

After all competitors:

## Cross-Competitor Pain Patterns
| Pain Theme | {Comp 1} | {Comp 2} | {Comp 3} | {Comp 4} | Opportunity |
|-----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|-------------|
| {pain 1} | severity | severity | severity | severity | {implication} |
| {pain 2} | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

Pains shared across multiple competitors = structural market problems = biggest opportunities.

## Data Gaps
- [Competitors with few reviews]
- [Platforms not checked]

Save to: {project-name}/raw/review-mining.md

Agent B2: Forum & Community Mining

Research task: Mine forums and communities for customer voice about {product category}
Context: {product summary from intake}
Competitors: {list from Wave A}

Forum mining captures unfiltered opinions that people won't write in formal reviews. It also reveals the exact language customers use — gold for positioning and copywriting.

RESEARCH PROTOCOL:

ROUND 1 — Reddit (3-4 searches):
- "site:reddit.com {product category} recommendations"
- "site:reddit.com {competitor name} alternative"
- "site:reddit.com {problem statement} tool"
- "site:reddit.com switching from {competitor name}"

ROUND 2 — Indie communities (2-3 searches):
- "site:indiehackers.com {product category}"
- "site:news.ycombinator.com {product category}"
- "{product category} forum discussion"

ROUND 3 — Q&A and niche (2 searches):
- "site:quora.com best {product category}"
- "{product category} community Slack Discord"

ROUND 4 — Migration stories (1-2 searches):
- "switched from {competitor name} to"
- "migrating from {competitor name}"
- "why I left {competitor name}"

OPTIONAL — Reviewed X/Twitter source packet:
If the user already has an approved X/Twitter export, search result, reply
thread, account summary, or monitor report from a tool such as TweetClaw, treat
it as an extra evidence packet for language mining. Do not ask for cookies,
sessions, API keys, screenshots, or raw account access. Extract only quoted
customer language, URLs, timestamps, and source labels, then mark the packet as
user-provided evidence in Data Gaps and Sources.

OUTPUT FORMAT:

## Forum & Community Findings

### Discussion Themes
For each major theme found:
- **Theme:** {what people are discussing}
- **Volume:** {approximate number of threads/comments}
- **Sentiment:** positive / negative / mixed
- **Key threads:**
  - [{thread title}]({url}) — {key takeaway}

### Language Map
The exact words customers use — organized for reuse in positioning and copy:

**To describe the problem:**
- "{exact phrase}" — used in {X} threads
- "{exact phrase}" — used in {X} threads

**To describe desired solution:**
- "{exact phrase}"
- "{exact phrase}"

**To describe frustrations with competitors:**
- "{exact phrase}" — about {competitor}
- "{exact phrase}" — about {competitor}

**To describe switching triggers:**
- "{exact phrase}"
- "{exact phrase}"

### "What do you use for X?" Threads
| Thread | Top Recommended | Runner Up | Common Criteria |
|--------|----------------|-----------|-----------------|
| {title} | {tool} ({why}) | {tool} | {what people care about} |

### Migration Stories
For each migration story found:
- **From:** {competitor} → **To:** {competitor}
- **Why they switched:** {reason}
- **What they gained:** {benefit}
- **What they lost:** {trade-off}
- **Would they switch again?** {yes/no and why}

### Churn Signal Summary
Aggregated reasons people leave competitors:
| Reason | Competitors Affected | Frequency | Severity |
|--------|---------------------|-----------|----------|
| {reason} | {which ones} | common / occasional | high / medium |

## Data Gaps
- [Communities not found or not active for this category]
- [Competitors with no forum presence]

Save to: {project-name}/raw/forum-mining.md

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

No rule matched.

skilld matched fixed text patterns in SKILL.md and file names. Patterns miss obfuscated code.

skilld run checks every file with the same patterns. It asks for approval before it loads a Skill with a behavior marked Needs approval.

1 warning23d5 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub23d

    The skill is a competitive intelligence tool designed for market research. It uses web search and sub-agents to gather and synthesize competitor data into reports and battle cards. No malicious patterns such as exfiltration, obfuscation, or unauthorized command execution were detected. It includes an honesty protocol to ensure objective reporting.

  • Socket23d

    No alerts

  • Snyk23d

    Risk: MEDIUM · 1 issue

  • Runlayer7mo

    2/6 files flagged

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at a5f97c3. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 2 hours ago.

Steadyupdated 4 months ago

README badge

README badge for ferdinandobons/startup-skill/startup-competitors