skilld
All skills
imbad0202 avatar

/academic-paper-reviewer

@a3f6569
by Edward Cheng-I Wuimbad0202/academic-research-skills50k stars
3,864

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정, revisar artículo, revisión entre pares, revisión de manuscrito, informe de árbitro, revisa mi artículo, criticar artículo, simular revisión, revisión editorial, calibrar revisor.

Ask your Agent

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/imbad0202/academic-research-skills/academic-paper-reviewer

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

referenceschangelog.md

≈349 tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Changelog

Version Date Changes
Unreleased 2026-08-15 Contract-honesty hardening (#739/#740): categorical, criterion-bound review outputs; current live packages fixed at NOT_CALIBRATED until measured-profile application has a closed replay contract; typed six-axis panel provenance with exact machine handoff and no binary independence claim. No reviewer-correctness or outcome-improvement claim.
1.4 2026-03-08 Historical release that introduced a numerical rubric and fixed decision mapping (now retired). Current behavior uses criterion-bound narrative judgements; live packages remain NOT_CALIBRATED, and measured-profile application is not yet wired. Quick Mode Selection Guide retained.
1.3 2026-03-05 DA vs R3 role boundaries with explicit responsibility tables; CRITICAL finding criteria with concrete examples; Consensus classification (CONSENSUS-4/3/SPLIT/DA-CRITICAL); Confidence Score weighting rules; Asian & Regional Journals reference (TSSCI + Asia-Pacific + OA options)
1.2 2026-03 Added statistical reporting standards reference; enhanced methodology_reviewer_agent with statistical reporting adequacy sub-step
1.1 2026-02 Added Devil's Advocate Reviewer (7th agent), added re-review mode, expanded review team from 4 to 5
1.0 2026-02 Initial version: 6 agents, 4 modes, 3-phase workflow

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

Third-party checks

1 warning6d5 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub6d

    The skill is a multi-agent framework for academic paper review. It is well-architected with significant security defenses against prompt injection from the manuscripts it processes. The primary risk is the large attack surface provided by untrusted input data, though this is mitigated by explicit boundary instructions.

  • Socket6d

    No alerts

  • Snyk6d

    Risk: MEDIUM · 1 issue

  • Runlayer6mo

    18 files scanned · No issues

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Provenance

Signed by skilld at a3f6569. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 34 minutes ago.

Activeupdated last week

Capability

Other metadata
metadata
{
  "version": "1.11.1",
  "last_updated": "2026-08-15",
  "status": "active",
  "data_access_level": "raw",
  "task_type": "open-ended",
  "related_skills": [
    "academic-paper",
    "academic-pipeline"
  ]
}

README badge

README badge for imbad0202/academic-research-skills/academic-paper-reviewer