All skills
jwynia avatar

/gitea-workflow

@99a8797
by J Wyniajwynia/agent-skills160 stars
20

Orchestrate agile development workflows for Gitea repositories using the tea CLI. Use when working with Gitea-hosted repos and asking to 'run the workflow', 'continue working', 'what's next', 'complete the task cycle', 'start my day', 'end the sprint', 'implement the next task', or wanting guided step-by-step development assistance. Keywords: workflow, orchestrate, agile, task cycle, sprint, daily, implement, review, PR, standup, retrospective, gitea, tea.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/jwynia/agent-skills/gitea-workflow

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

referencescommandsretrospective.md

≈1k tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Retrospective Command Reference

Post-task analysis and context network updates.

Purpose

Conduct retrospective analysis after completing a task to identify what should be captured in the context network and what adjustments need to be made.

When Used in Workflow

  • Sprint End: Comprehensive sprint retrospective
  • Post-Task: After significant task completion
  • Weekly: End of week review

Domain Boundary Reminder

  • Context Network: Planning, architecture, design, strategies
  • Project Artifacts: Source code, configuration, tests, public docs

Retrospective Process

Phase 1: Task Review

Task Summary:

  • What was the original objective?
  • What was actually accomplished?
  • Were there deviations from plan?

Decision Inventory:

  • What architectural decisions were made?
  • What trade-offs were considered?
  • What alternatives were rejected and why?

Discovery Log:

  • What unexpected challenges emerged?
  • What new patterns were discovered?
  • What assumptions proved incorrect?
  • What discovery records were created?

Phase 2: Gap Analysis

Missing Documentation:

  • Planning documents that would have helped?
  • Design decisions not captured anywhere?
  • New patterns that should be documented?
  • Discovery records that would have saved time?

Outdated Information:

  • Documentation that was incorrect?
  • Nodes whose relationships changed?
  • Confidence levels that need updating?

Relationship Gaps:

  • Connections between nodes not documented?
  • New cross-domain relationships discovered?
  • Navigation paths that would help?

Phase 3: Update Requirements

For each gap, determine:

Update Type:

  • New node creation
  • Existing node modification
  • Relationship establishment
  • Navigation guide enhancement

Priority:

  • Critical: Would cause immediate problems
  • Important: Would improve future work significantly
  • Nice-to-have: Enhances understanding

Phase 4: Execute Updates

New Node Creation:

## Node: [Title]

### Classification
- Domain: [Where it fits]
- Stability: [Change frequency]
- Confidence: [How certain]

### Key Content
[Essential information]

### Critical Relationships
- Depends on: [Prerequisites]
- Enables: [What it makes possible]

### Task Context
- Discovered during: [Task name]
- Relevance: [Why this matters]

Node Modification:

## Update for: [Node Title]

### What Changed
- Previous: [Old understanding]
- New: [Current understanding]
- Reason: [What led to change]

### Impact
- Affected relationships: [What needs review]
- Downstream implications: [What else needs updating]

Phase 5: Changelog Entry

## Retrospective: [Task Name] - [Date]

### Task Summary
- Objective: [Goal]
- Outcome: [Result]
- Key learnings: [Discoveries]

### Context Network Updates

#### New Nodes Created
- [Node Name]: [Brief description]

#### Discovery Records Created
- [YYYY-MM-DD-###]: [Description]

#### Nodes Modified
- [Node Name]: [What changed]

#### New Relationships
- [Source] → [Type] → [Target]: [Why it matters]

### Patterns and Insights
- Recurring themes: [What patterns emerged]
- Process improvements: [How to do better]
- Knowledge gaps: [What's still missing]

### Follow-up Recommendations
1. [Recommendation]: [Rationale]

Execution Checklist

  • Reviewed all decisions made during task
  • Identified planning/architecture content created
  • Checked for outdated documentation encountered
  • Documented new patterns discovered
  • Created/updated relevant context network nodes
  • Established important relationships
  • Updated navigation guides
  • Created changelog entry
  • Identified follow-up improvements

Quality Checks

  1. Placement: All planning docs in context network?
  2. Relationships: Bidirectional links documented?
  3. Classification: Accurate for all nodes?
  4. Navigation: Would someone else find this?
  5. Future Value: Will this save time later?

Orchestration Notes

Retrospective is an end-of-cycle activity:

  • Run after significant task completion
  • Run at sprint boundaries
  • Ensures learning is captured before context is lost

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

3 warnings14d5 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub14d

    The skill orchestrates agile workflows for Gitea repositories using the 'tea' CLI and local shell scripts. It manages the development lifecycle from task selection to PR completion. The analysis identified a risk of indirect prompt injection due to the ingestion of untrusted data from backlog files and Gitea API responses without sanitization.

  • Socket14d

    1 alert: gptAnomaly

  • Snyk14d

    Risk: MEDIUM · 1 issue

  • Runlayer7mo

    23/23 files flagged

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at 99a8797. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 2 months ago.

Dormantupdated 8 months ago
compatibility
Requires git, Gitea Tea CLI (tea), and a context network with backlog structure.
Other metadata
metadata
{
  "author": "agent-skills",
  "version": "1.0",
  "type": "orchestrator",
  "mode": "generative",
  "domain": "agile-software"
}

README badge

README badge for jwynia/agent-skills/gitea-workflow