/documd-visuals

Release Plan Trade-Off — Ship Now Or Harden First (Infographic)

Best for: framing a binary decision where each side has consequences Avoid when: there are three or more genuinely different options (compare those instead) Answers: what each choice buys, and what it costs

infographic compare-binary-horizontal-compact-card-fold
theme
  colorPrimary #2b66c4
  palette
    - #2b66c4
    - #2f9e44
    - #f3a33c
    - #d1242f
    - #7048e8
    - #0f9b9b
    - #c16f8a
    - #7c5a3d
data
  title Ship 4.2 Now, Or Harden First
  desc Fold layout puts the trade-off side by side
  compares
    - label Ship now
      desc Value in customers' hands this week
      children
        - label Pro
          desc Unblocks two enterprise pilots
        - label Pro
          desc Feedback loop starts sooner
        - label Con
          desc Known flaky migration path
    - label Harden first
      desc Two extra weeks of stabilisation
      children
        - label Pro
          desc Migration runs cleanly at scale
        - label Pro
          desc Support load stays flat
        - label Con
          desc Pilots stall on the calendar

Data Shape

Exactly two compares entries; each side's children are the arguments. Keep to three arguments per side — the fold layout divides the width, so longer lists crowd.

Key Options

Pitfalls

• ❌ Only listing pros → ✅ a trade-off without cons is advocacy
• ❌ Unequal argument counts → ✅ balance the columns or the diagram looks rigged
• ❌ Three or more options → ✅ binary layouts break past two; use vendor-selection-scorecard.md

Alternatives