All skills
simota avatar

/nexus

@c805268
by shingo imotasimota/agent-skills85 stars
15

Orchestrating multi-specialist task chains and scope-adaptive product delivery: classifies intent, selects and executes the minimum viable chain, aggregates results, and verifies acceptance criteria. For multi-domain tasks, build-first delivery, and product lifecycle execution.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/simota/agent-skills/nexus

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

referencemarquee-recipe.md

≈4.3k tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Marquee Blueprint — the lp domain preset of wish

/nexus marquee "<product/offer>" ≡ /nexus wish domain=lp — the lp domain preset of the wish quality-ceiling engine. marquee is a named alias kept for discoverability; the engine (crystallization → tournament → gauntlet-converge → One-Shot Gate, termination bound, Q9 separation) is owned by reference/wish-recipe.md and is not re-derived here. This file owns only what the preset fixes: the 5-dimension LP Ceiling Rubric with machine oracles, the GROUND and PRODUCE phases, the LP skeptic angles, and the Marquee Dossier.

Read this file before executing the marquee Recipe.


1. Nature / When to Use / Boundaries

Marquee is wish machinery specialized to one deliverable class: the acquisition landing page. It inherits wish's quality apparatus (crystallization dialogue → exemplar anchoring → cross-engine blind tournament → calibrated gauntlet-converge → reception → One-Shot + Comparative exit gates) and swaps wish's generic rubric authoring for a fixed 5-dimension LP Ceiling Rubric whose Performance dimension is anchored to machine-checkable oracles — the objective corner of the ceiling that no reviewer's taste can inflate or deflate.

Inherited engine elements (owned by reference/wish-recipe.md, not re-derived here). The preset does not re-implement them; it states only where its own phases already discharge them:

Engine element How the lp preset satisfies it
Benchmark Anchor (wish §6 Phase 1.5) Discharged by Phase 2 GROUND — the Compete competitor-LP teardown is the exemplar sweep. Two additions apply: the teardown must name 2-4 exemplar LPs judged best-in-class (not merely competitors) and one routine-quality control LP, and dims ①②③⑤ rewrite their score-3 anchors as sourced against those exemplars. Dim ④ needs no anchoring — its oracles are absolute.
Two-point calibration (wish §7) Evaluators for dims ①②③⑤ score the exemplar and the control before scoring any candidate direction. Dim ④ is calibration-exempt — a machine oracle cannot inflate.
Cross-engine blind tournament (wish §6 Phase 2) The 3 orthogonal directions are distributed across model families where the hub allows, one per (engine, direction), and judged with provenance stripped. A single-engine run declares the monoculture in the Dossier.
Reception Simulation (wish §6 Phase 3.5) The Cast+Field personas built at GROUND meet the produced page cold before the exit gates — no rubric, no loop history. First-impression failures enter as evidence on dims ① and ⑤.
Comparative Gate (wish §6 Phase 4b) Blind head-to-head: the produced page vs the strongest exemplar LP, and vs the retained runner-up direction. Runs alongside the One-Shot Gate; together they grant at most one bonus cycle.
Budget envelope (wish §4) Declared at launch confirmation; budget-reached delivers best-so-far with the residual gap.
Rubric amendment (wish §7) Not available. The 5-dim rubric is the preset's defining fixture — a request to amend it means the deliverable is not an acquisition LP, and the honest move is wish general or runway.

Intentional difference from wish: no Scarcity Gate. LP production is a legitimately repeatable demand — every product, campaign, and launch can warrant one — so marquee does not ration invocations. The anti-inflation anchor is objectivity instead: dim ④ cannot ACCEPT without Lighthouse Perf/SEO/Best-Practices ≥ 95, all Core Web Vitals green, and WCAG AA. This is a deliberate design choice, not drift.

Use marquee for

  • The flagship acquisition LP — the page that defines how the product is first seen and must convert.
  • A launch with no revision runway: the page ships once and the campaign fires against it.
  • When the user asks for "the best possible landing page" and means it — ceiling quality across message, craft, conversion, performance, and trust simultaneously.

Not this — route to

Not this Route to Why
A normal-quality or premium LP (single direction, standard bar) funnel[premium] skill direct Funnel[premium]'s six-craft-axis studio pipeline covers standard-to-premium without tournament/ceiling cost
One LP section or a simple page funnel skill direct Minimum viable chain
Improving an existing LP against a metric or design brief kaizen / restyle Improve family owns existing surfaces
In-product flagship UI surface (core screen, onboarding — not an acquisition device) runway Runway is the design tournament for product UI; conversion is not its first-class dimension
Doc + slide quality maximization podium Content pipeline, not a conversion device
The single most important ask of any deliverable type wish Deliverable-agnostic wrapper with the Scarcity Gate
Post-ship market/brand verification growth-acceptance Marquee's ship feeds it (A/B handoff recorded in the Dossier)

Overloaded anchor: bare "landing page" with no ceiling framing → REDIRECT per reference/intent-clarification.md (normal quality → funnel[premium]/funnel; ceiling one-shot → marquee).

Scale: 26-55 agents × ≤4 cycles (3 + ≤1 exit-gate bonus), 10-24× cost. Per-phase: P0-P1 ≈ 2 · P2 ≈ 4-6 (Ground sweep) · P3 ≈ 9-12 (3 directions × structure+direction+prototype, + judge panel) · P4 ≈ 6-8 (craft-axis production) · P5 ≈ 5-7 Evaluators/cycle + 2-3 skeptics on near-ceiling cycles · P6-P7 ≈ 2. Confirm-before-launch always (unconditional — intentional parity with wish/summit).

Model selection: as wish §1, judgment-heavy phases at plan-tier / rest at Sonnet 5 default — mapped here to Phase 1 Crystallize + the Phase 6 One-Shot Gate verdict (plan-tier) vs tournament generators, craft-axis producers, and Evaluators (Sonnet 5).


2. Termination Bound

As wish §2 (reference/wish-recipe.md) for the exit-reason vocabulary and best-so-far reporting, with two preset-fixed deltas: N=3 is fixed (no L/XL N=5 escalation) — hard total 4 cycles including the One-Shot bonus cycle; and ACCEPT requires dim ④ to reach 3 only via its machine oracles (Lighthouse/CWV/WCAG) — a candidate ACCEPT with a failing Lighthouse run is structurally impossible.

3. Confirm / Safety Gate

As wish §3 (reference/wish-recipe.md) for the confirm-always parity, the contract-level/AUTORUN-cannot-skip checkpoint mechanic, and the F8 cost-gate subsumption. Marquee-specific: Phase 0 surfaces the 5-dimension rubric skeleton + preliminary cost envelope; Phase 1 Crystallize excavates the conversion contract (goal / single CTA / offer / audience / brand constraints / disappointment criteria).

  • No Scarcity Gate — intentional difference from wish (§1).
  • Standard Ask First tiers apply unchanged (L4 security, 10+ files, external publish/deploy — shipping the LP to a live host is an external system modification and always confirms).

4. Resume

Checkpoint-resume (≥ 4 phases): marquee resume — persist the Marquee Contract + Ceiling Rubric at Phase 1 exit; the Evidence Ledger at Phase 2 exit; the winning direction's full prototype content plus the salvage list at Phase 3 exit (resume must never re-run the tournament); the produced page + per-dim score trajectory + surviving attacks at each Phase 5 cycle boundary. An interrupted marquee resumes mid-convergence with its trajectory intact.


5. Phase Contract (AUTORUN chain template)

Phase 0  FRAMING ★Confirm-before-launch (always)
         Nexus[scope + rubric skeleton + preliminary cost envelope]
   ▼
Phase 1  CRYSTALLIZE ★contract-level dialogue (AUTORUN cannot skip; plan-tier model;
         reference/dialogue-protocol.md)
         → Marquee Contract: conversion goal + single CTA + offer + audience +
           brand constraints + disappointment criteria (each mapped to a score-0 trigger)
         → lock the Ceiling Rubric (5 fixed dims, §5a; reachability sanity-checked by Magi)
   ▼
Phase 2  GROUND ‖ Compete[competitor LP teardown] ‖ Cast+Field[personas — the Echo
         walkthrough roster] ‖ Growth[search intent + GEO] ‖ Evidence Ledger per
         reference/research-grounding.md (every claim/number/logo/testimonial cited
         and trust-tiered; ungrounded claims are barred from copy)
   ▼
Phase 3  TOURNAMENT ‖ 3 orthogonal directions: narrative-led / design-led / proof-led
         (replace with dialogue-surfaced axes when Phase 1 finds better ones)
         each direction: Funnel[structure] + Vision[direction] + Forge[hero + 1 section
         prototype] — prototype-level competition, never 3 full builds
         → judge panel = Echo×personas ‖ Palette ‖ Growth[CRO] ‖ Magi[brand-fit],
           scoring vs the frozen Ceiling Rubric
         → winner + salvage list (informal cherry-pick from runners-up, fed to Phase 4)
   ▼
Phase 4  PRODUCE — funnel[premium] craft axes as the production substrate:
         Prose[copy — Evidence-Ledger-grounded] ‖ Artisan[build] ‖ Flow[motion] ‖
         Ink/Builder[image assets] ‖ Muse[token-first] ‖ Growth[SEO/OGP/JSON-LD]
         (parallel branches per _common/PARALLEL.md; Artisan owns page integration)
   ▼
Phase 5  GAUNTLET-CONVERGE loop ≤ 3 cycles (evaluator-loop-protocol.md machinery;
         Generator excluded from Evaluators)
         every cycle   ‖: Echo[persona re-walk → ①] ‖ Palette[a11y → ④] ‖
                          Bolt+Lighthouse[perf oracles → ④] ‖ Growth[CRO/SEO audit → ③] ‖
                          Voyager[real browser + responsive → ②④] ‖ Judge[craft → ②] ‖
                          Canon[legal]?[claims/legal → ⑤]
         staged        ‖: refutation panel per _common/ADVERSARIAL_REFUTATION.md —
                          spawned ONLY once all dims ≥ 2; LP-specific skeptic angles:
                          (a) bounce-reason enumeration — each persona names why they
                              would leave without converting;
                          (b) differentiation refutation — "does this page still hold
                              with a competitor's logo swapped in?" (a YES kills ①);
                          panel also ratifies candidate ACCEPTs (§2)
   ▼
Phase 5.5 RECEPTION — the GROUND personas (Cast/Field) meet the produced page COLD:
         no rubric, no loop history, first-impression only → friction points enter as
         evidence on dims ① message and ⑤ trust; unresolved failures become residuals
   ▼
Phase 6  EXIT GATES (both run; together they grant at most ONE bonus cycle, total 4) —
         MATERIALLY-BETTER test and loss semantics as wish §6 Phase 4 (`reference/wish-recipe.md`).
         (a) ONE-SHOT GATE — fresh-context independent verifier (plan-tier), spawned with
             ONLY the Marquee Contract + Ceiling Rubric + final page — no loop history.
         (b) COMPARATIVE GATE — blind head-to-head, provenance stripped: the produced page
             vs the strongest Phase 2 exemplar LP, and vs the retained runner-up direction.
         → either fires → exactly one bonus cycle → re-gate once (advisory only)
         → both pass → deliver
   ▼
Phase 7  SHIP — Guardian [+ Launch? if deploying] + Marquee Dossier;
         Experiment[A/B test design] recorded as a handoff to growth-acceptance

5a. The Ceiling Rubric (5 fixed dimensions, score-3 anchors)

# Dimension Score-3 anchor
① Message Value graspable in 3 seconds: every Echo persona can articulate the value proposition from the hero alone, unprompted
② Craft Visual and motion quality passes the multi-engine judge + Vision bar with zero craft findings
③ Conversion CRO architecture — the Growth audit yields zero improvement proposals (CTA hierarchy, friction, objection handling all closed)
④ Performance Machine oracles: Lighthouse Perf/SEO/Best-Practices ≥ 95, all Core Web Vitals green, WCAG AA — the objective, machine-checkable corner of the ceiling
⑤ Trust Every claim, number, and proof element traces to the Evidence Ledger; social proof present and verifiable; legal alignment (Canon[legal]? when claims are regulated)

Disappointment criteria from Phase 1 map onto these dims as score-0 triggers (wish mechanism, inherited verbatim). The dimension set is fixed — Phase 1 tunes the anchors to the product, never removes a dimension.

6. Output Report — Marquee Dossier (named)

Emitted inside NEXUS_COMPLETE on top of the base ## Nexus Execution Report:

  • Marquee Contract recap — conversion goal, CTA, offer, disappointment criteria, each classified per Acceptance Provenance (Q15)
  • Per-dim score trajectory — per-cycle scores across the 5 dimensions; machine-oracle raw values (Lighthouse / CWV / WCAG) attached for dim ④
  • Tournament comparison — the 3 directions' judge scores + why the winner won + salvage items applied
  • Evidence Ledger — every copy claim with citation, trust tier, and verification status
  • Gauntlet ledger — bounce-reasons raised / killed / fixed; differentiation-refutation verdict; open attacks listed on any plateau exit
  • Exit gates — One-Shot redo assessment with cited evidence + Comparative verdict (vs exemplar / vs runner-up, with the property named on any loss) + bonus-cycle usage
  • Calibration record — per evaluator: exemplar score, control score, verdict (dim ④ marked calibration-exempt)
  • Reception simulation — per-persona cold verdict + friction points + unresolved residuals
  • Exit reason (§2 vocabulary) + residual gap vs ceiling (empty only on ACCEPT)
  • A/B handoff — the Experiment test design queued for growth-acceptance

7. Failure Modes Prevented

Failure Mitigation
Beautiful but non-converting LP Conversion (③) and Performance (④) are first-class rubric dims, equal to Message/Craft — a gorgeous page that fails the Growth audit cannot ACCEPT
Ungrounded copy (invented numbers, unverifiable claims) Evidence Ledger gate (Phase 2, research-grounding.md): uncited claims are barred from copy; Trust (⑤) scores 0 on violation
Producer self-satisfaction ("it looks great to us") One-Shot Gate: fresh-context producer≠verifier redo-verdict with cited evidence (Q9, second application)
Slow LP shipped anyway Dim ④ machine oracles make ACCEPT structurally impossible below Lighthouse ≥ 95 / CWV green
Interchangeable-with-competitor page Differentiation refutation: logo-swap test kills Message (①) when the page could be anyone's
Subjective ceiling inflation ("everything is a 3") Dim ④ is machine-anchored; remaining dims use task-specific score-3 anchors + Magi reachability check before rubric freeze
Scarcity-gate misfire on a legitimate repeat demand No Scarcity Gate by design (§1) — objectivity via machine oracles replaces rationing

Inherited from wish §9 (reference/wish-recipe.md) unchanged: vibe acceptance of "best possible", first-idea anchoring, tournament cost blowup on small deliverables, generator grading its own work, unbounded ceiling pursuit.

8. Shared-Protocol References

Protocol Marquee-specific specialization
reference/evaluator-loop-protocol.md ACCEPT = all dims = 3 with panel ratification; dim ④ scored by machine oracles, not model judgment
_common/ADVERSARIAL_REFUTATION.md LP-specific angles: bounce-reason enumeration + competitor-logo-swap differentiation refutation
reference/dialogue-protocol.md Crystallize excavates the conversion contract (single CTA, offer, disappointment criteria)
reference/research-grounding.md Ledger grounds LP copy (claims/numbers/testimonials) rather than a reproduction baseline
reference/doc-quality-protocol.md Applied to page copy; W-violations feed Trust (⑤)
reference/autonomy-quality-protocol.md Q9 discharged per-dim in Phase 5, then holistically at the One-Shot Gate

(Middle column — what each protocol contributes — is as wish §10; see reference/wish-recipe.md.)

9. Decision Tree vs Neighbors

Is the deliverable an acquisition landing page?
  NO  → wish (any-deliverable ceiling) / runway (in-product UI) / podium (docs+slides)
  YES ↓
Does an LP already exist and just needs improvement?
  YES → kaizen (metric-driven) / restyle (visual direction)
  NO ↓
Is ceiling one-shot quality actually required (launch fires once, page defines the product)?
  NO  → funnel[premium] skill (standard-to-premium studio) / funnel skill (single page or section)
  YES → marquee — crystallize → ground → tournament → produce → gauntlet-converge
        → reception (cold personas) → One-Shot + Comparative gates → ship (+ A/B handoff to growth-acceptance)

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

3 warnings13d5 checks · Risk MEDIUM
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub13d

    The 'nexus' skill is a comprehensive multi-agent orchestration framework that manages complex task chains. While it incorporates extensive internal guardrails and verification protocols, it explicitly mandates the use of high-risk flags that bypass security permissions to achieve autonomy. It also provides instructions for establishing persistent tasks via cron and GitHub Actions, and utilizes external research tools to fetch content from the web.

  • Socket13d

    1 alert: gptSecurity

  • Snyk13d

    Risk: LOW · No issues

  • Runlayer6mo

    6/22 files flagged

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at c805268. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 2 days ago.

Activeupdated 2 weeks ago

README badge

README badge for simota/agent-skills/nexus