All skills
deanpeters avatar

/competitive-intel-watch

@eb7a51e

Scheduled delta monitoring against a prior competitive snapshot. Use when tracking competitors on a cadence: material shifts only, cited evidence, battle-card update flags, runs unattended.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/deanpeters/product-manager-skills/competitive-intel-watch

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

examplessample-industrial.md

≈1.3k tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Competitive Intel Watch — Worked Example (Industrial)

All companies, products, URLs, and figures are fictional. Industrial sibling of sample.md: this run diffs against the Northfield snapshot of 2026-08-28. Note the cadence difference from SaaS — industrial signals move slower, so this is a quarterly watch, and the SIGINT layer (pricing pages) gives way to filings, registries, and customs data. One of this run's finds is the same Helix "Foresight" re-scoping documented from the inside-out view in company-intel/examples/executive-signal-refresh.md — two skills, one fictional event.

Invocation: Competitive intel watch — prior snapshot pasted (Aug 28); this cycle I'm watching for Meridian channel-building moves. [snapshot]


Competitive Watch Report

1. Run Header

Scope (from prior snapshot): Northfield vs. retrofit-automation competitors; decision context: software-led retrofit line Prior snapshot date: 2026-08-28 This run date: 2026-11-06 Competitors checked: Helix Motion Systems, Meridian Freight Systems, Corvid Industrial

2. Changelog (Material Shifts Only)

Helix — Foresight re-scoped to aftermarket-only; digital leadership departed

  • What changed: Q3 call assigned Foresight to Aftermarket Services with an installed-base-first scope ("we'll expand from our installed base rather than chase greenfield" — CFO); the VP of Digital Transformation departed in September; digital-twin job postings fell ~40 → 6 — Fact (Q3 transcript; departure announcement; job boards, Oct 2026)
  • Evidence: URLs + dates above
  • So what: the snapshot's #1 competitive risk — "Helix opens Foresight to third-party equipment" — just moved sharply less likely: an aftermarket-scoped, installed-base-first program is the opposite of a mixed-vendor land grab. Roadmap owner acts: the mixed-vendor software window is wider than planned.
  • Confidence: high (three independent signals, one story)

Meridian — safety certification filing for plant-floor equipment class

  • What changed: a Meridian subsidiary appears in the certification body's public register with an "in process" listing for a plant-floor equipment class — Fact (registry entry, Oct 2026); component import volumes up again per customs data — Fact (trade data)
  • Evidence: URLs + dates above
  • So what: certifications are a 12-36 month runway signal — the manufacturing entry moved from architecture-inference to committed-spend evidence. Doesn't change this year's plan; changes next year's. Roadmap owner logs a dated tripwire.
  • Confidence: medium-high (two channels agree; no channel/distributor motion yet — the gating factor the snapshot named)

Corvid Industrial: nothing cleared the bar. Reorg-flavored employee reviews continue (below bar; unchanged trend).

3. Update Flags

Downstream artifact Sections needing update Driven by
Battle card Thirty-Second Read; Watch Out For (Foresight scope now a documented limitation, not a looming threat) Helix re-scoping
Roadmap assumptions Mixed-vendor window duration; Meridian entry timeline (now dated: registry + 12-36mo) both shifts

4. Watchlist for Next Run

  • Meridian: distributor listings or integrator partnership announcements (the channel signal that starts the real clock)
  • Helix: any Foresight compatibility-docs change adding third-party equipment (the reversal tripwire)
  • Corvid: post-split product-leadership hires (the distraction-window-closing signal)

Assumptions to Validate

  • Foresight's installed-base-first scope survives Helix's next planning cycle
  • Meridian's certification class maps to discrete manufacturing, not just warehouse-adjacent gear (registry class codes are ambiguous — needs a TECHINT read)
  • The integrator-margin assumption (open since August) — still unvalidated, now flagged twice

Why this example works

  • The cadence matched the physics. SaaS pricing pages justify monthly sweeps; filings, registries, and customs data move quarterly — so the watch runs quarterly and doesn't manufacture weekly noise from a slow-moving market.
  • A risk got demoted, and that's reported as material. Most watches only escalate. The Foresight re-scoping made the snapshot's top risk less likely — which changes roadmap posture just as much as a new threat would, and clears the materiality bar for exactly that reason.
  • Cross-skill coherence: this run reads the Foresight event from the outside (transcript, departures, job posts) while the company-intel refresh example reads the same event from a dedicated single-company deep dive — showing where the watch's altitude ends and company-intel begins.
  • An assumption flagged twice gets called out. The integrator-margin question has now survived two artifacts unvalidated; the watch names the streak instead of quietly re-listing it.

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

1 warning2mo3 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub2mo

    This skill is a competitive intelligence workflow designed to monitor market shifts by comparing new web data against previous research snapshots. It identifies changes in competitor pricing, positioning, and roadmaps. The skill includes built-in safety features such as requiring cited evidence for all claims and establishing human-review checkpoints for scheduled or unattended executions. No security issues were detected.

  • Socket2mo

    No alerts

  • Snyk2mo

    Risk: MEDIUM · 1 issue

Signed by skilld at eb7a51e. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub last month.

Activeupdated 3 months ago
argument-hint
[prior snapshot (pasted/attached), and anything specific to watch]
type
workflow
theme
market-intelligence
Other metadata
intent
A competitive intelligence delta monitor: given a previous Competitive Research Snapshot, sweep for material shifts since the last run and report only what changed — a cited changelog plus flags naming which battle card or positioning sections now need updating. Designed to run unattended on a loop or schedule; an empty changelog is a valid, useful result.
best_for
[
  "Keeping battle cards and positioning current without regenerating research weekly",
  "Running unattended on a schedule and reporting only changes a rep or roadmap owner would act on",
  "Turning competitive research from a one-off deliverable into a standing capability"
]
scenarios
[
  "Run this against last quarter's snapshot and tell me what actually changed",
  "Set up a monthly competitor watch that flags when our battle card goes stale"
]
estimated_time
10-25 min per run (after the baseline exists)

README badge

README badge for deanpeters/product-manager-skills/competitive-intel-watch