All skills
simota avatar

/helm

@95d6993
by shingo imotasimota/agent-skills85 stars
15

Simulating business strategy via short/mid/long-term scenario planning from financial, market, and competitive data. Applies SWOT/PESTLE/Porter, KPI forecasting, roadmaps. Does not write code.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/simota/agent-skills/helm

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

referencecognitive-biases.md

≈1.3k tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Purpose: Use this reference to detect and reduce cognitive bias in strategic work. It preserves the top bias patterns, observed rates, and practical debiasing mechanisms Helm should apply.

Contents

  • CB-01..CB-10
  • Debiasing methods
  • Phase risk map
  • Helm integration

Cognitive Biases in Strategic Decision-Making

Top Biases

ID Bias Observed rate Strategic impact Debiasing move
CB-01 Confirmation bias 78.2% Evidence is filtered to support the preferred thesis Use neutral fact-building and counterevidence review
CB-02 Overconfidence 71.0% Complexity and downside are underestimated Run a pre-mortem
CB-03 Anchoring 59.6% First framing dominates decision quality Evaluate multiple anchors in parallel
CB-04 Loss aversion 56.0% Necessary exits or pivots are delayed Make opportunity cost explicit
CB-05 Action bias — Teams act before thinking deeply enough Force a deliberate evaluation window
CB-06 Planning fallacy — Time, cost, and risk are underestimated Compare with external reference cases
CB-07 Groupthink — Harmony blocks critique and diversity Require dissent and structured review
CB-08 Dunning-Kruger effect — Teams overestimate internal capability Use benchmarking and 360 feedback
CB-09 Framing effect — Choice changes with wording Reframe the same case multiple ways
CB-10 Sunflower bias — Teams align with leader preference instead of evidence Anonymous input, leader speaks last

Debiasing Toolkit

Structural Interventions

Tool Use Best for
Red Team / Devil’s Advocate Build the strongest argument against the preferred path confirmation bias, groupthink
Pre-mortem Assume failure first, then work backward overconfidence, planning fallacy
External perspective Bring in benchmarks or independent review confirmation bias, anchoring
Anonymous voting / Delphi Collect judgments before social influence kicks in groupthink, sunflower bias

AI- and Data-Assisted Debiasing

Signal Use
Bias pattern detection Detect language patterns that imply overconfidence or cherry-picking
Scenario diversity scoring Flag scenario sets that are too homogeneous
Accuracy tracking Feed FORESIGHT to see where bias keeps recurring
Tool-assisted debiasing Research suggests up to 16% improvement in strategic outcomes

Phase Risk Map

Phase Highest-risk biases Mandatory check
Environment analysis confirmation bias, availability search for disconfirming evidence
Goal setting overconfidence, planning fallacy compare against outside benchmarks
Strategy design anchoring, groupthink run Red Team review
Decision-making loss aversion, framing restate options from multiple frames
Execution planning planning fallacy, action bias compare with similar prior cases
Monitoring confirmation bias, sunk-cost logic predefine kill criteria

Helm Integration

  1. Apply a bias check in every SCAN, MODEL, SIMULATE, and ROADMAP pass.
  2. Standardize pre-mortems in SIMULATE.
  3. Feed detected patterns into FORESIGHT.
  4. Score scenario diversity before finalizing a strategy package.
  5. Include a compact bias risk map in strategic review output when uncertainty is high.

2025-2026 Notes

  • Daniel Kahneman (1934-2024) — Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011) author and 2002 Nobel laureate — died 2024-03-27, age 90 (Princeton 2024-03-28, NPR 2024-03-27). The System 1 / System 2 framing remains the dominant pop-cognitive model; Richard Thaler (Nobel 2017, Nudge) and Cass Sunstein continue active publication. There is no single anointed successor — treat the field as plural and beware "argument from authority" framings of Kahneman quotes.
  • AI as bias amplifier and bias-detector — both — Helm should:
    • Use LLMs to flag confirmation-laden phrasing, monolithic scenario sets, and one-sided benefit framing before sign-off.
    • Avoid using LLMs as the arbiter of which scenario is "most likely" — RLHF tends to produce overconfident, conventional-wisdom-skewed completions.
    • When facilitating Red Team / Devil's Advocate, instruct the model to defend the minority view with citations and reject "balanced both-sides" output as a sunflower-bias artifact.
  • WEIRD critique extension (2025-): training data for both human-judgment baselines and LLM priors remains heavily Western / English / late-2010s-internet — apply geographic and temporal debiasing when the simulation crosses borders or addresses pre-2020 historical analogs.

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

1 warning5mo5 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub5mo

    The 'helm' skill is a comprehensive strategic analysis agent designed for business simulation and KPI forecasting. It utilizes frameworks like SWOT, PESTLE, and Porter's Five Forces to provide decision support. Security analysis confirms the skill is safe, with no detected malicious code, data exfiltration patterns, or obfuscation techniques. A minor surface for indirect prompt injection is noted due to the ingestion of external market data, which is standard for research-oriented agents.

  • Socket5mo

    No alerts

  • Snyk5mo

    Risk: MEDIUM · 1 issue

  • Runlayer6mo

    11 files scanned · No issues

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at 95d6993. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 2 days ago.

Activeupdated last month

README badge

README badge for simota/agent-skills/helm