All skills
imbad0202 avatar

/academic-paper

@c5c1b45

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, I got reviewer comments, revision roadmap, should we push back, conference rebuttal, grant panel response, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, check citations, citation check, check my references, verify references, look over the refs, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 我收到審查意見, 修訂路線圖, 評估回覆, 檢查引用, 引用檢查, 檢查參考文獻, 核對文獻, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견을 받았어, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지, 인용 확인, 인용 형식 검사, enmendar mi artículo, redactar artículo, guía mi artículo, analizar reseñas, auditar mi respuesta, verificar borrador de respuesta, verificar citas, divulgación de IA.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/imbad0202/academic-research-skills/academic-paper

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

referencespaper_structure_patterns.md

≈2.1k tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Paper Structure Patterns — 6 Paper Structure Models

Used by structure_architect_agent and intake_agent to select the appropriate paper structure.

Pattern 1: IMRaD (Introduction-Method-Results-Discussion)

Best for: Empirical research with original data collection and analysis Typical length: 5,000-8,000 words Disciplines: Sciences, Social Sciences, Education, Medicine

Structure

1. Title Page
2. Abstract (length: the guide's Standard row — academic-paper/references/abstract_writing_guide.md)
   Keywords (count: the same row)
3. Introduction
   3.1 Context and Background
   3.2 Problem Statement
   3.3 Research Gap
   3.4 Purpose and Research Questions
   3.5 Significance of the Study
4. Literature Review
   4.1 Theoretical Framework
   4.2 Theme 1: [related research]
   4.3 Theme 2: [related research]
   4.4 Theme 3: [related research]
   4.5 Summary and Conceptual Framework
5. Methodology
   5.1 Research Design
   5.2 Participants/Sample
   5.3 Data Collection
   5.4 Instruments/Measures
   5.5 Data Analysis
   5.6 Validity and Reliability
   5.7 Ethical Considerations
6. Results/Findings
   6.1 Descriptive Statistics (if quantitative)
   6.2 Finding 1 (aligned with RQ1)
   6.3 Finding 2 (aligned with RQ2)
   6.4 Finding 3 (if applicable)
7. Discussion
   7.1 Summary of Findings
   7.2 Interpretation and Comparison with Literature
   7.3 Theoretical Implications
   7.4 Practical Implications
   7.5 Limitations
   7.6 Future Research Directions
8. Conclusion
9. References
10. Appendices (if applicable)

Word Allocation (6,000-word example)

Section % Words
Introduction 15% 900
Literature Review 25% 1,500
Methodology 15% 900
Results 20% 1,200
Discussion 20% 1,200
Conclusion 5% 300

Pattern 2: Thematic Literature Review

Best for: Synthesizing existing research, identifying gaps, proposing future directions Typical length: 6,000-10,000 words Disciplines: All (especially Social Sciences, Education, Humanities)

Structure

1. Title Page
2. Abstract
   Keywords
3. Introduction
   3.1 Topic and Rationale
   3.2 Scope and Boundaries
   3.3 Review Methodology (search strategy, inclusion criteria)
   3.4 Organization of the Review
4. Theme 1: [descriptive title]
   4.1 Sub-theme A
   4.2 Sub-theme B
   4.3 Summary of Theme 1
5. Theme 2: [descriptive title]
   5.1 Sub-theme A
   5.2 Sub-theme B
   5.3 Summary of Theme 2
6. Theme 3: [descriptive title]
   6.1 Sub-theme A
   6.2 Sub-theme B
   6.3 Summary of Theme 3
7. Cross-Cutting Synthesis
   7.1 Convergent Findings
   7.2 Divergent Findings and Debates
   7.3 Methodological Observations
8. Research Gaps and Future Directions
   8.1 Identified Gaps
   8.2 Proposed Research Agenda
9. Conclusion
   9.1 Key Takeaways
   9.2 Implications for Practice/Policy
10. References

Word Allocation (8,000-word example)

Section % Words
Introduction 10% 800
Theme 1 20% 1,600
Theme 2 20% 1,600
Theme 3 20% 1,600
Synthesis 15% 1,200
Gaps & Future 10% 800
Conclusion 5% 400

Pattern 3: Theoretical Analysis

Best for: Developing, critiquing, or extending theoretical frameworks Typical length: 5,000-8,000 words Disciplines: Social Sciences, Philosophy, Education

Structure

1. Title Page
2. Abstract
   Keywords
3. Introduction
   3.1 The Theoretical Problem
   3.2 Why This Theory Matters
   3.3 Purpose and Contribution
4. Background: The Theory in Context
   4.1 Origins and Development
   4.2 Key Concepts and Definitions
   4.3 Current State of the Theory
5. Critical Analysis
   5.1 Strengths of the Framework
   5.2 Limitations and Gaps
   5.3 Competing Perspectives
   5.4 Empirical Support (or lack thereof)
6. Proposed Extension/Revision
   6.1 New Dimensions or Modifications
   6.2 Conceptual Model
   6.3 Propositions for Testing
7. Applications and Implications
   7.1 Theoretical Implications
   7.2 Practical Applications
   7.3 Methodological Implications
8. Conclusion
   8.1 Summary of Contribution
   8.2 Limitations of the Analysis
   8.3 Future Directions
9. References

Word Allocation (6,000-word example)

Section % Words
Introduction 12% 720
Background 20% 1,200
Critical Analysis 28% 1,680
Extension 20% 1,200
Applications 15% 900
Conclusion 5% 300

Pattern 4: Case Study

Best for: In-depth analysis of specific institutions, programs, events, or phenomena Typical length: 4,000-7,000 words Disciplines: Education, Business, Social Sciences, Medicine (clinical)

Structure

1. Title Page
2. Abstract
   Keywords
3. Introduction
   3.1 Background and Rationale
   3.2 Case Selection Justification
   3.3 Research Questions
4. Literature Context
   4.1 Relevant Theoretical Framework
   4.2 Prior Research on Similar Cases
5. Case Description
   5.1 Context and Setting
   5.2 Key Actors and Stakeholders
   5.3 Timeline of Events
   5.4 Data Sources
6. Analysis
   6.1 Analysis Framework
   6.2 Theme/Finding 1
   6.3 Theme/Finding 2
   6.4 Theme/Finding 3
7. Discussion
   7.1 Cross-Theme Synthesis
   7.2 Comparison with Literature
   7.3 Theoretical Insights
   7.4 Transferability (not generalizability)
8. Lessons Learned and Recommendations
   8.1 For Practitioners
   8.2 For Policymakers
   8.3 For Researchers
9. Conclusion
10. References
11. Appendices (case documents, data)

Word Allocation (5,000-word example)

Section % Words
Introduction 12% 600
Literature 15% 750
Case Description 20% 1,000
Analysis 25% 1,250
Discussion 18% 900
Recommendations 7% 350
Conclusion 3% 150

Pattern 5: Policy Brief

Best for: Evidence-based policy recommendations for decision-makers Typical length: 2,000-4,000 words Disciplines: Public Policy, Education, Health, Economics

Structure

1. Title and Author Information
2. Executive Summary (200-300 words)
   Key recommendations (3-5 bullet points)
3. Background
   3.1 The Policy Problem
   3.2 Current Policy Context
   3.3 Why Action is Needed Now
4. Evidence Base
   4.1 Key Finding 1
   4.2 Key Finding 2
   4.3 Key Finding 3
   4.4 International Comparisons (if relevant)
5. Policy Options Analysis
   5.1 Option A: [description]
       - Pros / Cons / Cost / Feasibility
   5.2 Option B: [description]
       - Pros / Cons / Cost / Feasibility
   5.3 Option C: [description]
       - Pros / Cons / Cost / Feasibility
6. Recommendations
   6.1 Recommended Option with Justification
   6.2 Implementation Steps
   6.3 Timeline
   6.4 Success Metrics
7. Conclusion
8. References
9. Appendix: Methodology Note

Word Allocation (3,000-word example)

Section % Words
Executive Summary 10% 300
Background 15% 450
Evidence 30% 900
Options 25% 750
Recommendations 15% 450
Conclusion 5% 150

Pattern 6: Conference Paper

Best for: Presenting research in progress or completed studies at academic conferences Typical length: 2,000-5,000 words (varies by conference) Disciplines: All

Structure (Short Paper)

1. Title, Authors, Affiliations
2. Abstract (length: the guide's Conference row — academic-paper/references/abstract_writing_guide.md)
   Keywords
3. Introduction
   3.1 Problem and Motivation
   3.2 Research Question(s)
4. Related Work
   4.1 Key Prior Studies
   4.2 Gap This Paper Addresses
5. Approach / Methodology
   5.1 Design
   5.2 Data/Materials
   5.3 Analysis
6. Results (Preliminary or Complete)
   6.1 Key Findings
   6.2 Tables/Figures
7. Discussion
   7.1 Interpretation
   7.2 Limitations
8. Conclusion and Future Work
9. References

Word Allocation (3,000-word example)

Section % Words
Introduction 15% 450
Related Work 20% 600
Methodology 20% 600
Results 25% 750
Discussion 12% 360
Conclusion 8% 240

Pattern Selection Guide

If your paper... Use Pattern
Has original data collection IMRaD
Synthesizes existing literature Literature Review
Develops/critiques a theory Theoretical
Analyzes specific cases in depth Case Study
Recommends policy actions Policy Brief
Presents at a conference Conference Paper

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

1 alert1d5 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub1d

    This skill provides a highly structured 12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. It contains robust internal defenses, including explicit 'instruction-data' boundaries and sanitization of user-provided content. However, the skill's complexity, its reliance on shell command execution for document processing and utility scripts, and its heavy ingestion of untrusted third-party materials (such as reviewer comments and external research content) present a surface for potential misuse and indirect prompt injection.

  • Socket1d

    No alerts

  • Snyk1d

    Risk: LOW · No issues

  • Runlayer6mo

    7/44 files flagged

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at c5c1b45. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 1 hour ago.

Activeupdated 2 days ago
Other metadata
metadata
{
  "version": "3.3.1",
  "last_updated": "2026-08-15",
  "status": "active",
  "data_access_level": "raw",
  "task_type": "open-ended",
  "related_skills": [
    "deep-research",
    "academic-paper-reviewer",
    "academic-pipeline"
  ]
}

README badge

README badge for imbad0202/academic-research-skills/academic-paper