All skills
imbad0202 avatar

/academic-paper

@c5c1b45

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, I got reviewer comments, revision roadmap, should we push back, conference rebuttal, grant panel response, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, check citations, citation check, check my references, verify references, look over the refs, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 我收到審查意見, 修訂路線圖, 評估回覆, 檢查引用, 引用檢查, 檢查參考文獻, 核對文獻, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견을 받았어, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지, 인용 확인, 인용 형식 검사, enmendar mi artículo, redactar artículo, guía mi artículo, analizar reseñas, auditar mi respuesta, verificar borrador de respuesta, verificar citas, divulgación de IA.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/imbad0202/academic-research-skills/academic-paper

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

templatesbilingual_abstract_template.md

≈1.2k tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Bilingual Abstract Template

Usage

Use this template when writing bilingual abstracts in the run's declared output language pair (default zh-tw-en: Traditional Chinese L1 + English L2). Each version must be independently composed — not a translation of the other.


Pair Binding (#862 Phase 1)

The headings and column labels below are pair-derived: the L2 heading is the second language of the run's output_language_pair entry and the L1 heading is its first language. For the default entry zh-tw-en they render exactly as written here — ## English Abstract (L2) and ## Chinese Abstract (zh-TW) (L1), with the quality-checklist columns labelled EN (L2) and zh-TW (L1). The derived L1 heading label is the registry entry's short language name (Chinese for Traditional Chinese (zh-TW)), as in abstract_bilingual_agent.md; the registry's full name is never rendered.

For any other registry entry, substitute that entry's declared L2 and L1 language names in the headings and in the checklist column labels. The structure, the five components, and the keyword line do not change. When the field is absent the default entry applies and this template is used unchanged.

Registry and language roles: shared/output_language_pair.md. Abstract length and keyword counts: the regime table in references/abstract_writing_guide.md. Enter a token only from that registry; an unsupported value fails visibly and names the registry rather than falling back to the default.


English Abstract

[Paper Title in Title Case]

[Background — 1-2 sentences: Establish the context and identify the research problem.]

[Purpose — 1 sentence: State the specific research objective or question.]

[Method — 1-2 sentences: Describe the research approach, data sources, and analytical method.]

[Findings — 2-3 sentences: Present the key results. Include specific details, numbers, or effect sizes where applicable.]

[Implications — 1-2 sentences: State the significance, practical impact, or contribution to the field.]

Keywords: [keyword 1], [keyword 2], [keyword 3], [keyword 4], [keyword 5], [keyword 6] (optional), [keyword 7] (optional)

Target: the L2 length of this run's row in the regime table of abstract_writing_guide.md


Chinese Abstract (zh-TW)

[Paper Title in Chinese]

[Research Background — 1-2 sentences: Describe the research context and the problem being investigated.]

[Research Purpose — 1 sentence: Clearly state the research objective or research question.]

[Research Method — 1-2 sentences: Describe the research methodology, data sources, and analytical strategy.]

[Research Findings — 2-3 sentences: Present the main research results, including specific data or key findings.]

[Research Significance — 1-2 sentences: Explain the research contribution, practical implications, or theoretical value.]

Keywords: [Keyword 1], [Keyword 2], [Keyword 3], [Keyword 4], [Keyword 5], [Keyword 6] (optional), [Keyword 7] (optional)

Target: the L1 length of this run's row in the regime table of abstract_writing_guide.md


Quality Checklist

Check EN zh-TW
Covers all 5 components (Background, Purpose, Method, Findings, Implications) ☐ ☐
Within the regime table's range (abstract_writing_guide.md) for the run's pair and paper type ☐ ☐
Independently composed (not a translation) ☐ ☐
Key findings match between versions ☐ ☐
Quantitative data consistent ☐ ☐
Keyword count per language within the regime table in abstract_writing_guide.md ☐ ☐
Keywords complement title (not duplicate) ☐ ☐
No citations in the abstract ☐ ☐
No undefined abbreviations ☐ ☐
Reads naturally in target language ☐ ☐

Guidelines

Independence Test

Your abstracts are truly independent if:

  • Sentence structures differ between languages
  • The L1 version uses natural phrasing in its own academic register (default: Chinese, not translationese)
  • Minor details may be grouped or reordered to suit each language's conventions
  • Both versions stand alone as complete summaries

Keywords Strategy

  • The two languages' keywords should cover similar conceptual space
  • Keywords should complement (not duplicate) the title
  • Count per language comes from the regime table in the linked guide (abstract_writing_guide.md) — this template restates no figure
  • Mix broad discipline terms with specific research terms
  • Include methodology terms if distinctive

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

1 alert1d5 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub1d

    This skill provides a highly structured 12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. It contains robust internal defenses, including explicit 'instruction-data' boundaries and sanitization of user-provided content. However, the skill's complexity, its reliance on shell command execution for document processing and utility scripts, and its heavy ingestion of untrusted third-party materials (such as reviewer comments and external research content) present a surface for potential misuse and indirect prompt injection.

  • Socket1d

    No alerts

  • Snyk1d

    Risk: LOW · No issues

  • Runlayer6mo

    7/44 files flagged

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at c5c1b45. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 33 minutes ago.

Activeupdated 2 days ago
Other metadata
metadata
{
  "version": "3.3.1",
  "last_updated": "2026-08-15",
  "status": "active",
  "data_access_level": "raw",
  "task_type": "open-ended",
  "related_skills": [
    "deep-research",
    "academic-paper-reviewer",
    "academic-pipeline"
  ]
}

README badge

README badge for imbad0202/academic-research-skills/academic-paper