All skills
imbad0202 avatar

/academic-paper

@c5c1b45

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, I got reviewer comments, revision roadmap, should we push back, conference rebuttal, grant panel response, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, check citations, citation check, check my references, verify references, look over the refs, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 我收到審查意見, 修訂路線圖, 評估回覆, 檢查引用, 引用檢查, 檢查參考文獻, 核對文獻, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견을 받았어, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지, 인용 확인, 인용 형식 검사, enmendar mi artículo, redactar artículo, guía mi artículo, analizar reseñas, auditar mi respuesta, verificar borrador de respuesta, verificar citas, divulgación de IA.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/imbad0202/academic-research-skills/academic-paper

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

templatesimrad_template.md

≈1.1k tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

IMRaD Paper Template

Usage

This template provides the section-by-section skeleton for an empirical research paper following the Introduction-Method-Results-and-Discussion structure.

Replace all [bracketed text] with your content. Delete instructional comments after use.


[Paper Title in Title Case]

Author(s): [Author Name(s)] Affiliation(s): [Department, Institution] Corresponding Author: [Name, Email] Date: [Date]


Abstract

[Background: 1-2 sentences establishing context and the problem.] [Purpose: 1 sentence stating the research objective.] [Method: 1-2 sentences describing the approach and data.] [Findings: 2-3 sentences presenting key results with specific details.] [Implications: 1-2 sentences stating significance.]

Keywords: [keyword1], [keyword2], [keyword3], [keyword4], [keyword5]


1. Introduction

1.1 Context and Background

[Establish the broader context. What is the landscape? Why does this topic matter?] [2-3 paragraphs with citations]

1.2 Problem Statement

[What specific problem or gap exists? Why is it important to address?] [1-2 paragraphs with citations]

1.3 Research Gap

[What have previous studies missed or not adequately addressed?] [1 paragraph summarizing the gap based on literature]

1.4 Purpose and Research Questions

[State the purpose clearly. List research questions.]

The purpose of this study is to [verb] [object] in [context].

The following research questions guide this study:

  1. RQ1: [Question 1]?
  2. RQ2: [Question 2]?
  3. RQ3: [Question 3]? (if applicable)

1.5 Significance of the Study

[Why does this research matter? Who benefits?] [1 paragraph]


2. Literature Review

2.1 Theoretical Framework

[What theory/framework underpins this study?] [1-2 paragraphs with citations]

2.2 [Theme 1 Title]

[Review relevant literature on theme 1.] [2-3 paragraphs with citations]

2.3 [Theme 2 Title]

[Review relevant literature on theme 2.] [2-3 paragraphs with citations]

2.4 [Theme 3 Title]

[Review relevant literature on theme 3.] [2-3 paragraphs with citations]

2.5 Summary and Conceptual Framework

[Synthesize the themes. Present conceptual framework if applicable.] [1-2 paragraphs]


3. Methodology

3.1 Research Design

[Describe the overall research design and justify the choice.] [1 paragraph]

3.2 Participants / Sample

[Who/what was studied? How were they selected? Sample size and characteristics.] [1-2 paragraphs]

3.3 Data Collection

[What data were collected? How? When? By whom?] [1-2 paragraphs]

3.4 Instruments / Measures

[What instruments were used? Reliability and validity evidence.] [1-2 paragraphs]

3.5 Data Analysis

[What analytical methods were applied? Software used?] [1 paragraph]

3.6 Validity and Reliability

[How were quality criteria ensured?] [1 paragraph]

3.7 Ethical Considerations

[IRB approval, informed consent, data protection.] [1 paragraph]


4. Results / Findings

4.1 Descriptive Overview

[Present descriptive statistics or overview of data.] [Include Table 1: Descriptive Statistics if applicable]

4.2 [Finding for RQ1]

[Present results addressing RQ1.] [Include tables/figures as needed]

4.3 [Finding for RQ2]

[Present results addressing RQ2.] [Include tables/figures as needed]

4.4 [Finding for RQ3] (if applicable)

[Present results addressing RQ3.]


5. Discussion

5.1 Summary of Key Findings

[Brief overview of main results.] [1 paragraph]

5.2 Interpretation and Comparison with Literature

[What do the findings mean? How do they compare with prior studies?] [2-3 paragraphs with citations]

5.3 Theoretical Implications

[How do findings advance theory?] [1-2 paragraphs]

5.4 Practical Implications

[How can practitioners, policymakers, or institutions use these findings?] [1-2 paragraphs]

5.5 Limitations

[Be honest about study limitations.] [1 paragraph, typically 3-5 limitations]

5.6 Future Research Directions

[What should future studies investigate?] [1 paragraph]


6. Conclusion

[Summarize the paper's contribution in 1-2 paragraphs. End with a strong closing statement.]


AI Disclosure

[This paper was prepared with the assistance of AI-powered academic writing tools. All content has been reviewed and verified by the author(s).]


References

[APA 7th edition format. Hanging indent. Alphabetical order.]


Appendices (if applicable)

Appendix A: [Title]

[Supplementary materials]

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

1 alert1d5 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub1d

    This skill provides a highly structured 12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. It contains robust internal defenses, including explicit 'instruction-data' boundaries and sanitization of user-provided content. However, the skill's complexity, its reliance on shell command execution for document processing and utility scripts, and its heavy ingestion of untrusted third-party materials (such as reviewer comments and external research content) present a surface for potential misuse and indirect prompt injection.

  • Socket1d

    No alerts

  • Snyk1d

    Risk: LOW · No issues

  • Runlayer6mo

    7/44 files flagged

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at c5c1b45. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 33 minutes ago.

Activeupdated 2 days ago
Other metadata
metadata
{
  "version": "3.3.1",
  "last_updated": "2026-08-15",
  "status": "active",
  "data_access_level": "raw",
  "task_type": "open-ended",
  "related_skills": [
    "deep-research",
    "academic-paper-reviewer",
    "academic-pipeline"
  ]
}

README badge

README badge for imbad0202/academic-research-skills/academic-paper