All skills
imbad0202 avatar

/academic-paper

@c5c1b45

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, I got reviewer comments, revision roadmap, should we push back, conference rebuttal, grant panel response, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, check citations, citation check, check my references, verify references, look over the refs, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 我收到審查意見, 修訂路線圖, 評估回覆, 檢查引用, 引用檢查, 檢查參考文獻, 核對文獻, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견을 받았어, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지, 인용 확인, 인용 형식 검사, enmendar mi artículo, redactar artículo, guía mi artículo, analizar reseñas, auditar mi respuesta, verificar borrador de respuesta, verificar citas, divulgación de IA.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/imbad0202/academic-research-skills/academic-paper

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

templatesliterature_review_template.md

≈724 tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Literature Review Paper Template

Usage

This template provides the skeleton for a thematic literature review paper that synthesizes existing research, identifies gaps, and proposes future directions.


[Paper Title in Title Case]

Author(s): [Author Name(s)] Affiliation(s): [Department, Institution] Date: [Date]


Abstract

[Background and rationale: 1-2 sentences.] [Purpose and scope of the review: 1 sentence.] [Method: 1 sentence on search strategy and source selection.] [Key findings from the synthesis: 2-3 sentences.] [Implications and identified gaps: 1-2 sentences.]

Keywords: [keyword1], [keyword2], [keyword3], [keyword4], [keyword5]


1. Introduction

1.1 Topic and Rationale

[Why is this literature review needed? What makes it timely?] [2 paragraphs with citations]

1.2 Scope and Boundaries

[What is included and excluded? Time period? Disciplines? Geographies?] [1 paragraph]

1.3 Review Methodology

[Search strategy: databases, keywords, inclusion/exclusion criteria.] [Number of sources reviewed.] [1-2 paragraphs]

1.4 Organization of the Review

[Preview the thematic structure.] [1 paragraph]


2. [Theme 1: Descriptive Title]

2.1 [Sub-Theme A]

[Review literature on this sub-theme.] [2-3 paragraphs with citations]

2.2 [Sub-Theme B]

[Review literature on this sub-theme.] [2-3 paragraphs with citations]

2.3 Summary of Theme 1

[What does the literature collectively tell us about this theme?] [1 paragraph]


3. [Theme 2: Descriptive Title]

3.1 [Sub-Theme A]

[2-3 paragraphs with citations]

3.2 [Sub-Theme B]

[2-3 paragraphs with citations]

3.3 Summary of Theme 2

[1 paragraph]


4. [Theme 3: Descriptive Title]

4.1 [Sub-Theme A]

[2-3 paragraphs with citations]

4.2 [Sub-Theme B]

[2-3 paragraphs with citations]

4.3 Summary of Theme 3

[1 paragraph]


5. Cross-Cutting Synthesis

5.1 Convergent Findings

[What do the themes agree on? What patterns emerge across themes?] [1-2 paragraphs]

5.2 Divergent Findings and Debates

[Where do researchers disagree? What are the unresolved debates?] [1-2 paragraphs]

5.3 Methodological Observations

[What methods dominate? What methods are underused?] [1 paragraph]


6. Research Gaps and Future Directions

6.1 Identified Gaps

[List and discuss 3-5 specific gaps in the literature.] [1-2 paragraphs]

6.2 Proposed Research Agenda

[What should future researchers investigate? What methods should they use?] [1-2 paragraphs]


7. Conclusion

7.1 Key Takeaways

[Summarize the 3-5 most important insights from the review.]

7.2 Implications for Practice and Policy

[How should practitioners or policymakers use these insights?]


AI Disclosure

[Standard AI disclosure statement.]


References

[Complete reference list in selected citation format.]

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

1 alert1d5 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub1d

    This skill provides a highly structured 12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. It contains robust internal defenses, including explicit 'instruction-data' boundaries and sanitization of user-provided content. However, the skill's complexity, its reliance on shell command execution for document processing and utility scripts, and its heavy ingestion of untrusted third-party materials (such as reviewer comments and external research content) present a surface for potential misuse and indirect prompt injection.

  • Socket1d

    No alerts

  • Snyk1d

    Risk: LOW · No issues

  • Runlayer6mo

    7/44 files flagged

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at c5c1b45. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 34 minutes ago.

Activeupdated 2 days ago
Other metadata
metadata
{
  "version": "3.3.1",
  "last_updated": "2026-08-15",
  "status": "active",
  "data_access_level": "raw",
  "task_type": "open-ended",
  "related_skills": [
    "deep-research",
    "academic-paper-reviewer",
    "academic-pipeline"
  ]
}

README badge

README badge for imbad0202/academic-research-skills/academic-paper