All skills
imbad0202 avatar

/academic-paper

@c5c1b45

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, I got reviewer comments, revision roadmap, should we push back, conference rebuttal, grant panel response, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, check citations, citation check, check my references, verify references, look over the refs, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 我收到審查意見, 修訂路線圖, 評估回覆, 檢查引用, 引用檢查, 檢查參考文獻, 核對文獻, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견을 받았어, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지, 인용 확인, 인용 형식 검사, enmendar mi artículo, redactar artículo, guía mi artículo, analizar reseñas, auditar mi respuesta, verificar borrador de respuesta, verificar citas, divulgación de IA.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/imbad0202/academic-research-skills/academic-paper

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

templatestheoretical_paper_template.md

≈729 tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Theoretical Paper Template

Usage

This template provides the skeleton for a paper that develops, critiques, or extends a theoretical framework.


[Paper Title in Title Case]

Author(s): [Author Name(s)] Affiliation(s): [Department, Institution] Date: [Date]


Abstract

[Theoretical problem addressed: 1-2 sentences.] [Purpose of the analysis: 1 sentence.] [Analytical approach: 1 sentence.] [Key contribution (new framework/critique/extension): 2 sentences.] [Implications: 1 sentence.]

Keywords: [keyword1], [keyword2], [keyword3], [keyword4], [keyword5]


1. Introduction

1.1 The Theoretical Problem

[What theoretical issue or gap motivates this paper?]

1.2 Why This Theory Matters

[What practical or intellectual consequences depend on getting this right?]

1.3 Purpose and Contribution

[What does this paper do? Develop, critique, extend, or synthesize?]


2. Background: The Theory in Context

2.1 Origins and Development

[Historical development of the theory. Key thinkers and milestones.]

2.2 Key Concepts and Definitions

[Define the core constructs, their relationships, and boundaries.]

2.3 Current State of the Theory

[How is the theory used today? Dominant interpretations and applications.]


3. Critical Analysis

3.1 Strengths of the Framework

[What does the theory do well? Evidence of its explanatory power.]

3.2 Limitations and Gaps

[Where does the theory fall short? What can't it explain?]

3.3 Competing Perspectives

[What alternative theories address the same phenomena? How do they compare?]

3.4 Empirical Support (or Lack Thereof)

[What does the evidence say? Are the theory's predictions supported?]


4. Proposed Extension / Revision

4.1 New Dimensions or Modifications

[What changes or additions does this paper propose?]

4.2 Conceptual Model

[Present the revised or new framework, ideally with a visual model.]

4.3 Propositions for Testing

[What testable predictions does the revised framework generate?]

Proposition Description Testable Via
P1 [proposition] [method]
P2 [proposition] [method]
P3 [proposition] [method]

5. Applications and Implications

5.1 Theoretical Implications

[How does this contribute to the broader theoretical landscape?]

5.2 Practical Applications

[How can practitioners use this framework?]

5.3 Methodological Implications

[What new methods does this framework call for?]


6. Conclusion

6.1 Summary of Contribution

[1 paragraph restating the paper's key contribution.]

6.2 Limitations of the Analysis

[Acknowledge the boundaries of this theoretical work.]

6.3 Future Directions

[What research should follow?]


AI Disclosure

[Standard AI disclosure statement.]

References

[Complete reference list.]

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

1 alert1d5 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub1d

    This skill provides a highly structured 12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. It contains robust internal defenses, including explicit 'instruction-data' boundaries and sanitization of user-provided content. However, the skill's complexity, its reliance on shell command execution for document processing and utility scripts, and its heavy ingestion of untrusted third-party materials (such as reviewer comments and external research content) present a surface for potential misuse and indirect prompt injection.

  • Socket1d

    No alerts

  • Snyk1d

    Risk: LOW · No issues

  • Runlayer6mo

    7/44 files flagged

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at c5c1b45. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 33 minutes ago.

Activeupdated 2 days ago
Other metadata
metadata
{
  "version": "3.3.1",
  "last_updated": "2026-08-15",
  "status": "active",
  "data_access_level": "raw",
  "task_type": "open-ended",
  "related_skills": [
    "deep-research",
    "academic-paper-reviewer",
    "academic-pipeline"
  ]
}

README badge

README badge for imbad0202/academic-research-skills/academic-paper