All skills
imbad0202 avatar

/academic-paper

@c5c1b45

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, I got reviewer comments, revision roadmap, should we push back, conference rebuttal, grant panel response, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, check citations, citation check, check my references, verify references, look over the refs, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 我收到審查意見, 修訂路線圖, 評估回覆, 檢查引用, 引用檢查, 檢查參考文獻, 核對文獻, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견을 받았어, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지, 인용 확인, 인용 형식 검사, enmendar mi artículo, redactar artículo, guía mi artículo, analizar reseñas, auditar mi respuesta, verificar borrador de respuesta, verificar citas, divulgación de IA.

Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/imbad0202/academic-research-skills/academic-paper

This session only. Nothing lands on disk.

templatespolicy_brief_template.md

≈912 tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.

Policy Brief Template

Usage

This template provides the skeleton for an evidence-based policy brief targeting decision-makers. Policy briefs are shorter, more direct, and action-oriented than academic papers.


[Policy Brief Title — Clear and Action-Oriented]

Author(s): [Author Name(s)] Affiliation: [Institution] Date: [Date] Target Audience: [e.g., MOE officials, university administrators, legislators]


Executive Summary

[The policy problem in 1-2 sentences.] [Key evidence in 1-2 sentences.] [Primary recommendation in 1-2 sentences.]

Key Recommendations

  1. [Recommendation 1 — one sentence]
  2. [Recommendation 2 — one sentence]
  3. [Recommendation 3 — one sentence]

1. Background

1.1 The Policy Problem

[What is the problem? Who is affected? How severe is it?] [Use specific data to illustrate the problem.]

1.2 Current Policy Context

[What existing policies or regulations are relevant?] [What has already been tried?]

1.3 Why Action is Needed Now

[What makes this urgent? What happens if nothing changes?] [Include a compelling statistic or projection.]


2. Evidence Base

2.1 Key Finding 1: [Title]

[Present evidence clearly with citations.] [Include a figure or table if helpful.]

2.2 Key Finding 2: [Title]

[Present evidence clearly with citations.]

2.3 Key Finding 3: [Title]

[Present evidence clearly with citations.]

2.4 International Comparisons (if relevant)

[How do other countries/regions handle this issue?] [What can we learn from their experience?]


3. Policy Options Analysis

Option A: [Descriptive Name]

[1-2 paragraph description of the option.]

Criterion Assessment
Effectiveness [High/Medium/Low — brief justification]
Feasibility [High/Medium/Low — brief justification]
Cost [High/Medium/Low — estimate if available]
Timeline [Short-term / Medium-term / Long-term]
Political Acceptability [High/Medium/Low]

Option B: [Descriptive Name]

[1-2 paragraph description.]

Criterion Assessment
Effectiveness [assessment]
Feasibility [assessment]
Cost [assessment]
Timeline [timeline]
Political Acceptability [assessment]

Option C: [Descriptive Name]

[1-2 paragraph description.]

Criterion Assessment
Effectiveness [assessment]
Feasibility [assessment]
Cost [assessment]
Timeline [timeline]
Political Acceptability [assessment]

4. Recommendations

4.1 Recommended Option

[State the recommended option and justify the choice.] [1-2 paragraphs]

4.2 Implementation Steps

  1. Step 1 (Month 1-3): [action]
  2. Step 2 (Month 4-6): [action]
  3. Step 3 (Month 7-12): [action]
  4. Step 4 (Year 2+): [action]

4.3 Success Metrics

Metric Baseline Target Timeline
[Metric 1] [current value] [target value] [when]
[Metric 2] [current value] [target value] [when]

4.4 Risk Mitigation

Risk Likelihood Mitigation
[Risk 1] [H/M/L] [strategy]
[Risk 2] [H/M/L] [strategy]

5. Conclusion

[1 paragraph restating the urgency and recommended action.]


AI Disclosure

[Standard AI disclosure statement.]

References

[Complete reference list — keep concise for policy brief audience.]

Appendix: Methodology Note

[Brief description of how the evidence was gathered and analyzed.]

Source: SKILL.md on GitHub

1 alert1d5 checks · Risk SAFE
  • Gen Agent Trust Hub1d

    This skill provides a highly structured 12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. It contains robust internal defenses, including explicit 'instruction-data' boundaries and sanitization of user-provided content. However, the skill's complexity, its reliance on shell command execution for document processing and utility scripts, and its heavy ingestion of untrusted third-party materials (such as reviewer comments and external research content) present a surface for potential misuse and indirect prompt injection.

  • Socket1d

    No alerts

  • Snyk1d

    Risk: LOW · No issues

  • Runlayer6mo

    7/44 files flagged

  • ZeroLeaks5mo

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

Signed by skilld at c5c1b45. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.

Last checked against GitHub 33 minutes ago.

Activeupdated 2 days ago
Other metadata
metadata
{
  "version": "3.3.1",
  "last_updated": "2026-08-15",
  "status": "active",
  "data_access_level": "raw",
  "task_type": "open-ended",
  "related_skills": [
    "deep-research",
    "academic-paper-reviewer",
    "academic-pipeline"
  ]
}

README badge

README badge for imbad0202/academic-research-skills/academic-paper