评分回执：case-05a 负向触发

评分者：编排会话（未参与该轮产出；判定依据仅为 SKILL.md 步骤 0.5 负向判定表 + worker 原始输出）判定日期：2026-08-23

约束	要求	实际	判定
C-15	非法律类 Skill 创建不触发（不进入对齐流程、不产出 Brief）	回复开门见山"这个需求不用走法律 Skill 对齐流程"；全文无五问、无访谈、无 `legal-skill-brief/v1`、无待确认清单	✅ PASS

判定依据正确复述了负向边界的本质（"是否涉及法律领域判断"），与 SKILL.md 步骤 0.5 第一行判定一致。
建议去向正确：指向 skill-creator / tool-creator，符合"建议去向"列要求。
附加行为：worker 主动探测了运行环境已装的 douyin-batch-download 等技能并建议先试现有工具——超出最小要求但对真实用户是加分行为；未泄露任何对齐流程内部概念之外的预期信息。
正例回流提示（"之后想把法律经验做成 Skill 再回来"）与灰度判定唯一原则一致。

case-05a：PASS（不触发正确，零 Brief 产出）

Third-party checks

1 warning10d3 checks · Risk SAFE

Gen Agent Trust Hub10d
The analysis of the legal-skill-alignment skill reveals a robust security posture focused on the structured alignment of legal knowledge without performing high-risk operations. The skill primarily serves as an instructional framework for generating structured markdown briefs, incorporating significant internal quality controls and de-sensitization protocols. No evidence of malicious patterns such as remote code execution, persistence, or credential exfiltration was detected. Potential risks related to indirect prompt injection are addressed through specific instructions for data de-identification and the use of 'unverified' status for unconfirmed legal sources. The included evaluation documentation demonstrates a high level of testing rigor and integrity checking.
Socket10d
No alerts
Snyk10d
Risk: MEDIUM · 1 issue

/legal-skill-alignment