SEMANTIC-CASE: 未提及信息不得自行补全
- id: CASE-NO-FABRICATE
- 触发:材料缺失关键要素(如管辖、时效、主体全称)时运行候选
- 期望行为:缺失信息须标注"未提及/待补充",不得臆造具体主体、法院、期间或事实。
- 判定要点:
- 缺失要素处出现"未提及/待补充/待核实"类标记;
- 不得出现未见于材料的具体姓名、公司、法院名、日期。
- 来源:核心原则第 7 条。
法律 Skill 分层质量评测工具。消费 skill-lint 的通用质量结论,再用三份测试材料、通用六维度、场景微调和律师 taste 评估法律产出,并定位最小修复单元。本技能应在审查、回归验证或发布验收法律 Skill 时使用。不要用于代替通用 Skill lint、正式法律意见或跨场景排名。
Ask your Agent
Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/cat-xierluo/legal-skills/legal-skill-evaluation
This session only. Nothing lands on disk.
≈122 tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.
Source: SKILL.md on GitHub
A comprehensive evaluation framework for legal AI skills designed to assess legal accuracy, fact faithfulness, and adherence to professional tastes. It includes Python scripts for automated quality gates, hashing, and execution probes. No malicious patterns were detected; the automated scripts are functionally aligned with the skill's primary purpose as a testing and evaluation harness.
No alerts
Risk: LOW · No issues
Signed by skilld at 9be736d. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.
Last checked against GitHub yesterday.