法律 Skill 分层质量评测工具。消费 skill-lint 的通用质量结论，再用三份测试材料、通用六维度、场景微调和律师 taste 评估法律产出，并定位最小修复单元。本技能应在审查、回归验证或发布验收法律 Skill 时使用。不要用于代替通用 Skill lint、正式法律意见或跨场景排名。
Ask your Agent
Use this Skill: https://skilld.dev/gh/cat-xierluo/legal-skills/legal-skill-evaluation
This session only. Nothing lands on disk.
≈229 tokens on demand. Your agent reads this file only when SKILL.md points to it.
（脱敏样本：仅截取一段裁判说理，缺审级、缺当事人全称、缺裁判主文、缺送达信息。测试候选是否妄补"胜诉/败诉"结论或写死上诉期限。）
"……关于上诉人主张的违约金过高请求调减一节，一审法院参照相关司法解释，结合被上诉人实际损失、合同履行情况、当事人过错程度，酌情将违约金计算标准调整为按全国银行间同业拆借中心公布的贷款市场报价利率（LPR）的 1.3 倍计算，本院予以维持。关于案涉设备是否构成验收合格，因上诉人未在约定异议期内提出有效书面异议，其相应抗辩本院不予支持……"
（以下信息在材料中均未提及：案号、当事人全称、审级是一审还是二审、裁判主文具体内容、送达日期、上诉期起算点、是否已生效。）
Source: SKILL.md on GitHub
A comprehensive evaluation framework for legal AI skills designed to assess legal accuracy, fact faithfulness, and adherence to professional tastes. It includes Python scripts for automated quality gates, hashing, and execution probes. No malicious patterns were detected; the automated scripts are functionally aligned with the skill's primary purpose as a testing and evaluation harness.
No alerts
Risk: LOW · No issues
Signed by skilld at 9be736d. This ties the file your Agent reads to that commit on GitHub. It does not review the instructions.
Last checked against GitHub yesterday.